Sargsyan discovers rationality. Armenian President says decision to join the Russian led Customs Union and Eurasian Union is rational.

The Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan has announced that his country will join the Russian led Customs Union and will participate in the formation of the proposed Eurasian Union. This decision will in effect end the chances that Armenia will enter into an Association Agreement with the European Union and will sign the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area Agreement as was planned. Sargsyan made the announcement during a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday. Armenia was supposed to sign the agreements with the EU at the Vilnius Summit of the EU Eastern Partnership in November. The substantive part of the negotiations had been successfully concluded in July in Brussels,

Speaking to journalists after the meeting with President Putin, the Armenian leader said,

"One of the main topics of our discussions today was the need for infrastructural development in Armenia , the modernization and diversification of our economy in which Russia has a large investment.

We discussed areas where we can work together to expand the horizons of our cooperation. Amongst these are military-technical cooperation, the fuel and energy sector, including the issues of cooperation in the field of nuclear energy, transport and communications .

We have also held a detailed exchange of views on issues of Eurasian integration, and I confirmed Armenia's desire to join the Customs Union and to join in the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union. Twenty years ago, Armenia helped built a system of military security in the format of the Collective Security Treaty , in partnership with Russia and some other CIS countries. Over the decades, the system has proved its viability and effectiveness. Now, our partners in the CSTO form a new platform of economic interaction . I have repeatedly said that Our existence in the same security structure makes isolation from the corresponding geo-economic realm unfeasable and inefficient

It is a rational decision , this decision is based on the national interests of Armenia. This decision is not a rejection of our dialogue with the European institutions . During these same years, Armenia, with the support of European partners held a number of important institutional reforms. Both Armenia today , in this sense , is much more productive and competitive state than years ago. We intend in the future to continue these reform."

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment:

"There is nothing astonishing about the decision of the Armenian President to opt to join the Russian led Customs Union and the Eurasian Economic Union. In fact this is what many had been expecting all along. This is a decision for the Armenian government to make and it is up to the Armenian people, not others, to question it. What is quite astonishing however is that Armenia had for several years been pursuing a completely different course by engaging in negotiations to sign an Association Agreement with EU and a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement, and had indicated until a few days ago that this what it was going to do. How this all of a sudden stopped being rational is perplexing.

Nobody in Brussels or anywhere else in the European Union lost any sleep last night because of Sargsyan's decision. In fact a more closely associated Armenia would have necessitated considerable economic and financial committment on the part of the EU which will now not be necessary. One would assume that next time Mr Putin goes to Yerevan he will bring his chequebook with him. But internationally there will be questions about how Armenia goes about doing international relations, and domestically the decision, which has been taken with very little public consultation, will no doubt stir a debate."

source: commonspace.eu

photo; President Putin and President Sargbsyan after their meeting on 3 September 2013.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)