Richard Giragosian: War in Karabakh conflict zone is more than realistic

The recognition of Karabakh's independence by the State of Massachusetts demonstrates the importance of Nagorno-Karabakh to Washington, Head of the Regional Studies Center Richard Giragosian said at a press conference.

He recalled that in June 2012 the State of Rhode Island also adopted a similar resolution on Nagorno- Karabakh. These two resolutions are the evidence of Washington's interest in the Karabakh issue, he said.  The expert also stressed that the Karabakh conflict is of more interest to the United States than the other frozen conflicts.  

When speaking of possible developments in the Karabakh peace process, the expert said that Azerbaijan's aggression and the increase of its military potential create additional tension in the conflict zone. This is a signal for both Armenia and the international community. Giragosian added that the relations between Ankara and Baku, which have recently worsened, also make the situation tense in the region. In this context, the expert thinks that military actions in the  Karabakh conflict zone are more than probable.  

The expert thinks that the OSCE Minsk Group format for the Karabakh  peace process is a deadlock. He said that the OSCE MG is only to maintain the diplomatic aspect of the peace process and to prevent  possible unleashing of military actions. He also stressed that despite the OSCE MG's efforts, the conflicting parties maintain their  own approaches on the basic components of the Karabakh problem.  

As regards the domestic political situation in Nagorno-Karabakh, Giragosian stressed that despite the democratic presidential elections on July 19 2012, the NKR still faces a complicated  socio-economic situation and high-level corruption.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mayhem in Baluchistan as separatist insurgents attack government targets across the Pakistani province

Mayhem in Baluchistan as separatist insurgents attack government targets across the Pakistani province

There was violence and mayhem across the Pakistani Indian Ocean province of Baluchistan on Friday and Saturday (30-31 January), as separatist insurgents attacked multiple government targets, in a co-ordinated attack in a number of towns and cities. Security forces conducted a large-scale counter-terrorism operation across Baluchistan following a series of coordinated attacks targeting multiple districts, killing civilians and security personnel, according to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) of the Pakistani government. "The operation, conducted over two days, resulted in the deaths of 133 insurgents, including suicide bombers, while 15 security personnel were killed during intense engagements", according to the government source. The attacks took place in Quetta, Mastung, Nushki, Dalbandin, Kharan, Panjgur, Tump, Gwadar and Pasni. "The assaults were aimed at destabilising peace in the province and undermining development by targeting law enforcement agencies and innocent civilians", the Pakistani government said.  The Pakistani government said the attacks were launched by “Indian sponsored Fitna al Hindustan,” a reference to the separatist Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), saying intelligence reports confirmed the violence was orchestrated and directed by militant leaders operating from outside Pakistan, who were in direct communication with attackers during the assaults. The BLA also issued a statement earlier in the day, saying it had launched what it called “Operation Herof 2.0” and claiming responsibility for attacks in multiple locations. Pakistani officials describe BLA militants as Indian proxies, a charge New Delhi denies.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)