Opinion: Central Asia is treading carefully after Wagner's mutiny in Russia

"As Russia tries to manage its internal challenges, Central Asian countries are treading carefully, prioritising stability and cooperation and avoiding involvement in Russia's internal affairs," writes Arianna Belluardo in this op-ed for commonspace.eu. "While maintaining economic and diplomatic ties with Russia, however, Central Asia is also feeling out other opportunities amid shifting regional dynamics, not least with China, whose influence in the region is indeed growing, but remains in Russia’s shadow at least for now."

While the speculation over Vladimir Putin’s control over the Russian Federation spreads around the world after the Wagner mercenary group staged an abortive mutiny on 23-24 June, the Central Asian republics are treading carefully. Although they have tried to distance themselves from Moscow’s actions in Ukraine, Central Asian trade with Russia rubs along in the background. Meanwhile, increasing Central Asian ties with China - Russia’s great Eurasian ally and rival - are gradually changing the geopolitical landscape.

While the Central Asian republics may hold doubts about to what extent Vladimir Putin wields control over the Russian government and its military campaign in Ukraine, they are aware that openly casting aspersions on Putin's domestic situation could invite backlash. As of now, Central Asian leaders are primarily focused on avoiding involvement in Russia's internal affairs.

Kazakhstan's President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev recently held a National Security Council meeting to discuss the recent events in Russia, but publicly stated that the matter is an “internal affair of Russia”. Meanwhile Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev mentioned that he had a phone conversation with Putin but did not provide any details. Other Central Asian leaders remained silent on the matter altogether. 

Whether Wagner’s machinations in Russia may weaken Moscow’s influence in Central Asia to China’s benefit is, for now, up for debate. “Chinese and Russian power plays in Central Asia are complex and subtle,” wrote Temur Umarov and Alexander Gabuev in a recent op-ed for Foreign Affairs. And, although China has serious interests in Central Asia, Russia remains the dominant power and holds considerable levers of influence, especially economic ones. 

This is not to discount growing Chinese activity in the region, however. Chinese goods accounted for the largest share of Uzbekistan's imports during the first five months of 2023, amounting to $3.7 billion; and China-Kazakhstan trade turnover in 2022 grew 34% on the previous year, amounting to $24.1bn over the 12 months. All evidence would suggest this trend will continue.

As far as the Russia-Ukraine war is concerned, Kazakhstan has said that China’s proposed peace plan for Ukraine - which was rejected by Kyiv for failing to explicitly call on Russian troops to withdraw from occupied territories - was “worthy of support”. The Kazakh Foreign Ministry said that adherence to the UN Charter is crucial, and emphasised support for the United Nations as an indispensable global organisation for upholding the principles of “territorial integrity, independence and sovereignty of the state”. 

On the other hand, the EU and the wider West - which also see strategic opportunities in Kazakhstan and Central Asia as a whole - have continued supplying Kyiv with huge tranches of military aid to support its ongoing counteroffensive, calculating that any mediated ceasefire would disproportionately benefit Russia by allowing its forces to regroup and resupply for potential future military actions.

As Russia tries to manage its internal challenges, Central Asian countries are treading carefully, prioritising stability and cooperation and avoiding involvement in Russia's internal affairs. While maintaining economic and diplomatic ties with Russia, however, Central Asia is also feeling out other opportunities amid shifting regional dynamics, not least with China, whose influence in the region is indeed growing, but remains in Russia’s shadow at least for now.

source: Arianna Belluardo is a Junior Research Associate at LINKS Europe
photo: Getty Images
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular