(Updated) Libyan prime minister survives assassination attempt as fate of elections remains undecided

Gunmen attacked the convoy of the interim Libyan Prime Minister Abdelhamid Dbeibah’s in Tripoli earlier this morning (10 February). A  bullet penetrated the windscreen of the car but Dbeibah and his driver escaped unhurt. Reports say that the assassins fired at the prime minister's car from another car, and immediately fled the scene. Libya’s chief prosecutor has already launched an investigation into the attack.

The assassination attempt deepens the political crisis in Libya,  

Abdulhamid Dbeibeh, a powerful businessman, was elected in January 2021 as part of the UN-sponsored inter-Libyan dialogue and was expected to ensure that the presidential election scheduled for 24 December would be held while unifying an already divided country. However, for the time being, no promises have been kept as the elections scheduled for last December were cancelled, and the eastern parliament has announced that they will not be held this year again. Western powers have called on Libyan institutions to set a new date for the elections.

The attack comes in a tense week for Libya as the eastern-based parliament, the House of Representatives (HoR), said that there would be no elections this year, and that the parliament would choose a new interim prime minister today (10 February). The eastern parliament has previously strongly criticised the delay of the elections and stated that Dbeibah has exceeded his term. 

The eastern parliament is expected to adopt a plan in coordination with the western High State Council to first amend the constitutional declaration that has served as Libya's de facto interim constitution since the 2011 revolution, and offer it to the people in a referendum. National elections would then not follow for another 14 months. 

The move thereby excludes the executive branch of power, and moves towards creating a different roadmap than the one envisioned earlier by the United Nations - the LPDF roadmap - which said the interim Government of National Unity (GNU)’s mandate would run until elections, but did not say what would happen if they did not take place.

Dbeibah said earlier this week that he would resist any attempts by the parliament, which is based in the eastern city of Tobruk, to replace his Tripoli-based government.

“I will accept no new transitional phase or parallel authority,” he said, declaring that his government would only hand over power to “an elected government”.

Libyan factions have been working on a roadmap since the scheduled elections collapsed in December last year but failed to reach any agreements. Elections were then postponed until January but many outstanding issues keep continuously being brought up by different factions. 

The former interior minister Fathi Bashagha, who ran for elections last year, and who is seen as a direct competitor for Dbeibah, has announced his candidacy for the premiership and will seek support from legislators for the premiership. 

The UN, Western powers, and even some members of parliament have called for Dbeibah to stay in his role until the elections. There is a risk that if the HoR proceeds with selecting a new PM, two parallel governments could emerge bringing the situation back as it was before 2020. 

 


Source: commonspace.eu with Al Jazeera (Doha), Reuters (London) and Arab News (Riyadh). 
Picture:  Picture: Prime Minister Abdulhamid Dbeibeh; Twitter: @TRTWorldRC

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)