Pandemic puts pressure on Gulf States sovereign wealth funds

Sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf countries are facing unprecedented challenges due to the rise of deficit and pressure to increase their financial obligations to state budgets. 

The drop in crude oil prices, caused by the pandemic last year, may force Gulf countries to increase their deficits and requiring them to withdraw from their sovereign wealth funds.

According to the reports of international rating agencies, the countries of the region may resort to liquidating part of their foreign investments in the sovereign funds rather than withdrawing from their foreign reserves with central banks to avoid disturbing the exchange rate of their currencies. 

The budget deficit of the Gulf states will reach 490 billion dollars in the four years from 2020 to 2023,  due increased financial requirement and low oil revenues, according to estimates by Standard & Poor's.

In a recent report, Moody's Investors Service said that Saudi Arabia and Oman are more vulnerable to a decline in sovereign assets in the medium term. 

Moody's added that the repercussions will lead to a significant erosion of protective margins in Saudi Arabia and the Sultanate of Oman, which reduces the financial strength of their sovereign funds and increases external risks.

"In the case of Oman, a large double deficit will lead to a decrease in both international reserves and sovereign wealth fund assets, which increases the risks of external vulnerability in the medium term," the report states.

As for Qatar and Abu Dhabi, sovereign wealth funds are sufficient enough to cover decades of fiscal deficit at current levels.

On the other hand, Kuwait faces the depletion of its liquid assets due to poor legislative framework despite having a huge stock of assets in its sovereign wealth fund. The legislative approval of the Kuwait public debt law has been suspended since October 2017.

Kuwait needs to liquidate a maximum of $ 15 billion to cover public budget expenditures during the next fiscal year (2021/2022), as per Moody's estimates. The country faces a difficult choice of either passing the pubic debt law or increasing taxes to make up for the losses. 

Sovereign wealth funds are investment entities estimated at trillions of dollars. They are tasked with managing the financial wealth and reserves of countries. They consist of various assets such as real estate, stocks and bonds, and represent the investment arms of countries with financial surpluses.

Although the reputation of that type of sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf countries or their media appearance is considered relatively recent, some of these same funds were established long before. One of them is the Kuwait Fund, which is the first sovereign fund in the world, as it was established in 1953 under the name of the Kuwait Investment Authority (KIA).

The sovereign wealth fund was established in Abu Dhabi in 1976 under the name of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, while Dubai established its own fund in 2006, and the Qatar Investment Fund was established in 2005. Saudi Arabia had several funds until they were united under one entity in 2015 as part of the 2030 vision. 

Sovereign funds around the world incurred huge losses due to the repercussions of the pandemic. According to a report by Reuters in late March, sovereign wealth funds around the world lost more than 225 billion dollars,  with the share of Gulf funds including $ 300 billion.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with Arabi Post (London). 
Picture: Saudi Stock Exchange (Sita Institute). 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)