Karabakh de facto president wants to move his office to Shushi/Shusha

The de facto president of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic has again raised the issue of transferring key administraive buildings of the territory to the town of Shushi.

Speaking in the territory's parliament on Tuesday (11 August), Arayik Harutyunyan once again spoke about moving the parliament building to Shushi, but this time he also raised the possibility of moving the presidential residence to the town.

The issue is a contentious one, and crerated a sharp reaction in Azerbaijan when it was raised initially by Harutyunyan some months ago. Shushi (in Armenian) - or Shusha (in Azerbaijani) -  is one of the largest and oldest settlements in Nagorno-Karabakh and was at the centre of the fighting that took place there in the early 1990s duirng which the large Azerbaijani population was expelled. A lot of the town has remained in ruins since then.

Observers of the Karabakh conflct see Harutyunyan's proposal as an attempt to re-affirm the permanency of the present status quo, and de facto Armenian control of the territory. The move, which can happen as early as 2022 is likely to be welcomed by Armenian nationalists, but will inevitably be strongly condemned in Azerbaijan where the displaced community of Azerbaijanis from Shusha continue to agitate for their return to the town. 

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Buildings in many parts of Shushi/Shusha have remained in ruins since fighting there in 1989-94 (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)