EU to reduce presence in Mali but will remain engaged

Josep Borrell, the EU's foreign policy chief, said on Monday (11 April) that the European Union would suspend European army and national guard training missions with Malian soldiers, while continuing advisory and educational activities.

Borrell attributed his decision to the lack of guarantees from the Malian transitional authorities that Russian mercenaries from the paramilitary group Wagner would not interfere with the EU's work.

The ending of training of Malian forces by European forces casts further doubt on the longevity of the UN peacekeeping mission - MINUSMA - and the European Union's EUTM and EUCAP military training missions, following the departure of France and its allies earlier this year.

Mali and the Sahel region has been battling with an Islamist insurgency since al-Qaeda jihadists affiliates occupied northern Mali in 2012, forcing Bamako to seek external help to fend off the jihadist threat.

France, Mali's main military ally for almost 10 years, announced in February that it would withdraw its forces from Mali after ties deteriorated following Paris' criticism of the military coup and the military's unwillingness to return the country to civilian rule.

Moreover, France and its European allies have protested the presence of the Russian paramilitary group Wagner in Mali, designated by the West as “mercenaries”. Mali, which pays the Wagner group 10 million euros a month for its anti-terrorist assistance, considers the Russians as "instructors".

The terrorist threat has thus had a direct impact on the civilian population. 

According to the UN, internal displacement has increased tenfold since 2013, from 217,000 to a staggering 2.1 million by late 2021. Indeed, last year alone, armed groups carried out more than 800 deadly attacks.

The paramilitary group Wagner, which is already subject to EU sanctions as well as being accused of human rights abuses, was also responsible for the deaths of many civilians during a military operation in Moura, central Mali, in late March, according to Borrell.

If the military training is suspended, Josep Borrell was keen to reassure on the commitment of the EU in the Sahel by stating that the region remains a priority, and that the EU want to commit even more in this region. The EU will focus more on involving its security advisors.

With the growing terrorist threat south of the Sahel, Europeans are eager to stay in the region, both in the Sahel and in the Gulf of Guinea. Even if Mali is no longer an option, the EU could offer similar military training missions to countries such as Niger and Burkina Faso.

The Benelux and Southern European countries, at the EU Foreign Ministers' Council on Monday 11 April, were against the EU leaving the region. It is also felt necessary to maintain the dialogue between the EU and the Malian authorities, as it is not certain that Wagner's mercenaries can remain in Mali indefinitely.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Reuters (London), DW News (Bonn), Le Monde (Paris) and RFI (Paris)
Picture: File photo of a Spanish soldier guarding the EU Training Mission (EUTM) camp in Koulikoro, Mali, Tuesday, Nov. 28, 2017 ; Twitter: @MilitaryMonitor

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: Ukraine’s long-term prosperity, security and defence We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. Peace and stability in the Middle East We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: Ukraine’s long-term prosperity, security and defence We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. Peace and stability in the Middle East We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)