Ethiopia launches energy production through controversial Nile dam

Ethiopia has started energy production on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), the largest hydroelectric dam on the continent, on Sunday (20 February), following years of delays and international pushback.

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed travelled to the western town of Guba to inaugurate the GERD,  hailing the project as the “birth of a new era” in the East-African country's history.  

However some of Ehtiopia’s neighbours see the dam differently. The dam which lies on the Blue Nile, one of the two main tributaries to the Nile River, poses an “existential threat” to neighbouring countries and fellow Nile beneficiaries, Sudan and Egypt, according to Egyptian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sameh Shoukry. Egypt argues that the filling of the dam may destabilise its main water source, which accounts for 97% of the country’s drinking water and irrigation supply.

Recent talks under African Union auspices, aiming to formulate binding agreements on the filling and operation of the dam proved to be unsuccessful. Ethiopia proceeded with the second filling of the dam late last year despite sharp rhetorical comments from neighbouring countries,  and continued pressure from the League of Arab States and the UN Security Council,  all of which were flatly rejected by Abiy’s government.

Addis Ababa has had a long standing electricity deficit, with approximately two-thirds of the 110 million inhabitants lacking energy supply. According to Ethiopia’s Chief Negotiator, Dr Eng Seleshi Bekele, the GERD “creates access to 65M people without electricity”, whilst doubling Ethiopia’s total energy production.

Following the modernisation of its electrical grid, the second most energy deficient country in Africa aims to be entirely self-sufficient in its energy supply. The dam, which is expected to produce 5150 MW of electricity, will further contribute to the regions energy stability by exporting to neighbouring countries such as Kenya, which is due to enter an energy-purchasing agreement with Ethiopian Electric Power (EEP), the state’s electricity producer in the coming weeks.

This reconciliatory message was echoed at the 35th  African Union Session held in Addis Ababa earlier this month where Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed highlighted the “multiple benefits” that the finalisation of the dam presents for the “two downstream countries of Sudan and Egypt, as well as for East Africa at large”, listing the regulation of floods and the sparing of water from evaporation, which the prime minister claimed leads to the wastage of billions of cubic meters every year.

Citing a government official, Egyptian daily Al-Ahram claimed the Egyptian government fails to see such messages as sincere. Fears of losing any control over its water persist within the Egyptian government and Ethiopia’s strict control over its neighbours’ water supply without any formal arbitration mechanism might place additional pressures on its relations with Cairo and Khartoum.

In a statement on Sunday the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs lambasted the “unilateral” inauguration of the dam, claiming it is in neglect of the 2015 signed Declaration of Principles in which Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt outline the appropriate use of the dam.

Sources: Reuters, Al Jazeera, , Capital, Addis Standard, Al Ahram and other sources
Picture : Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed at the opening of the Great Ethiopian Renaissance Dam; Twitter: @AbiyAhmedAli

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.