Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
News

Decisive day for Armenia (Update 3)

1 May 2018

Update 3 at 18.00 GMT

Nikol Pashinyan, the leader of the mass popular movement that has swept Armenia over the last weeks, joined thousands of supporters in the centre of the country's capital Yerevan, immediately after his candidature for prime minister was voted down by the Armenian parliament, which is dominated by the current ruling party, the Republican Party.

Pashinyan told thousands of cheering supporters that packed the large square and adjoining streets, that the Republican Party had declared an open confrontation with the people, and called for a general strike to start tomorrow, Monday, 2 May at 8.15 am. Pashinyan called on his supporters to close all roads, railways and airports.

Pashinyan however insisted that protests must remain completely peaceful.

Update 2 at 17.00 GMT

The Armenian Parliament failed to elect Nikol Pashinyan as prime minister after a long session during which the ruling Republican Parliament declared it will not support his candidature which was supported by all the other factions in the parliament. The vote was 56 against and 45 in favour with one abstension. The vote dissapointed thousands of people who had filled Yerevan's main square since the morning.

The situation increases the deadlock in the current political situation, and street protests are now likely to continue.

Update 1 at 11.00 GMT

Nikol Pahsiyev has been formally nominated for the post of Armenian Prime Minister at a special session of the country's parliament. Pashinyan laid down the main policy directions he proposes to follow. Pashinyan said he was against a system that gave absolute power to the prime minister, and said that the time when one person held all the power in Armenia was over.

Pashinyan gave a long exposition on the country's future foreign policy

He said many are surprised that the new government declares that it will not make major changes in the foreign policy course. "In case of my election to the post of prime minister, Armenia will continue to be a member of the Eurasian Economic Union and CSTO. This position does not come from the taste or changed position of the individual, but from the logic of the popular movement that won in the country.

Pashinyan said that as a result of this movement, the people of Armenia came to power, demanding numerous changes in the internal life of the country. This did not require and does not require changes in the foreign policy course. We as obedient servants of the people are obliged to reckon with this reality.

We considered and consider Russia a strategic ally of Armenia, and this nation-wide movement does not create any threats to the Armenian-Russian cooperation. We attach special importance to Armenia-Georgia and Armenia-Iran relations, and there is no doubt that this movement will give a new impetus to our relations with our neighbors. We will strengthen relations with the EU and the EU member states. We will do our best to liberalize the visa regime with the EU. We look forward to the beginning of negotiations on this issue in the very near future. The speedy ratification and application of the Armenia-EU comprehensive and expanded partnership is based on our relations.

Friendly relations with the United States need a new impetus, and we intend to give new impetus to the development of mutually beneficial Armenian-American cooperation in various fields. We will continue to deepen relations with China, and we consider this to be one of the most important directions of foreign policy, "

At the same time, he stressed that they attach great importance to the holding of the Francophonie summit in the fall and all measures will be taken for its proper conduct.

At the same time, the deputy stressed the commitment to international recognition and condemnation of the Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire, because he believes that only by recognizing this fact can new crimes against humanity be prevented. The oppositionist stressed that Armenia will continue its efforts to prevent further crimes against humanity.

Speaking about the Karabakh conflict, Pashinyan said that for them stereotypes in this matter are not important. "We are committed exclusively to a peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, based on the right of self-determination and equality of peoples. We need to give a new impetus to the international recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh. This should become one of the most important areas of the Diaspora's activities, "the opposition leader said.

At the same time, he stated that the most important part of the Armenian demand for this movement is justice and freedom, and their government intends to fully implement both of these requirements.

The session of the National Assembly continues

--------------

The Armenian Parliament is meeting this morning in an effort to elect a new prime minister, after street protests last week resulted in the resignation of Serzh Sargsyan from the post.

The only candidate is Nikol Pashinyan, the leader of the protest movement, and a member of parliament from the Yelk Group. Pashinyan is the only candidate that has been formally proposed, and also has the support of two other parliamentary factions, Prosperous Armenia and Armenia Revolutionary Federation. But the majority in the parliament is in the hands of the Republican Party, and whilst initially they indicated they will not hinder the election of Pashinyan, overnight reports suggest they may resort to filibustering tactics to prevent it happening.

Thousands of Pashinyan supporters have filled Yerevan's main square in a festive mood, but the next hours will be decisive both for Pashinyan's prospects, and for Armenia in general.

(This story will be updated throughout the day)

source: commonspace.eu

photo: Nikol Pashinyan (archive picture)

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?
Trending

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

19 October 2026
Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Dennis Sammut

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
Trending

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

7 September 2026
Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
Trending

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

21 September 2026
There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
Dennis Sammut