Baku reacts to Pashinyan’s speech in Nagorno-Karabakh

The Azerbaijani Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday (6 August) issued a statement in response to a speech made by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Monday (5 August) in Stepanakert. The MFA’s statement accuses the Prime Minister’s “aggressive statements” of “clearly [contradicting] the spirit and the essence of the negotiations on the settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict conducted for many years, including the recent discussions of the meetings between Armenia and Azerbaijan”.

The statement referred to the speech as a “major blow to the negotiation process mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs,” and that the Prime Minister’s remarks do not correspond to Armenia’s appeal for an “exclusive peaceful settlement of the conflict”.

The MFA’s statement also addressed the 2050 Armenian development goals, which Pashinyan declared during Monday’s speech, saying that the country will not be able to “achieve its ambitions for the next 30 years hiding behind its aggressive policy”. It accused the Armenian leadership of using the goals to deceive the Armenian people, advocating that Armenia “[evaluate] the current situation and [normalise] its relations with neighboring countries”.

The Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has responded to the statement by the Azerbaijani MFA, criticising it as “a stark demonstration of failure to adhere to basic rules of civility and decency, incapacity to sustain civilized norms of conduct between nations, especially amongst parties engaged at the highest level in highly complex and sensitive process of conflict resolution.” The retaliatory statement accused the Azerbaijani MFA of “personal attacks” and a “culture of intolerance and hatred towards the Armenian people”.

The Armenian MFA also accused the Azerbaijanis of failing to “understand the context and content” of the speech, defending Pashinyan’s rhetoric as addressing “the pan-Armenian agenda of advancing unity, solidarity, development and prosperity for Armenia, Artsakh and Diaspora”. It defended Armenia as the only ‘guarantor’ for those in Nagorno-Karabakh, condemning Azerbaijan’s unwillingness to involve the de facto leaders of the region in negotiations. It reaffirmed Armenia’s continued commitment to a “strictly peaceful resolution of the conflict” but that any solution “should be acceptable to the peoples of Artsakh, Armenia and Azerbaijan”.

The Head of Foreign Policy Affairs Department of the Azerbaijani Presidential Administration, Hikmet Hajiyev, weighed in yesterday by saying, “By making this destructive and provocative statement, the Armenian side again puts the region face to face with threats and risks, and intentionally escalates the situation to divert public attention from its domestic issues”. Hajiyev accused Pashinyan of contradicting his “recent statements that he 'cannot speak on behalf of Nagorno-Karabakh',” and of misleading the international community In the negotiations.

Observers are concerned that the spat may undermine the feasibility of Pashinyan’s new government to make headway on the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process, and that it may increase the likelihood of ‘war by accident’, with Azerbaijan abandoning faith in a peaceful settlement to the conflict.

Sources: commonspace.eu and agencies
Photo: 
Azerbaijani MFA (picture courtesy of Azertag website)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)