Monday Commentary: The situation around Greenland brings out the best of Europe, and the worst of Trump‘s United States

Donald Trump continues to claim Greenland, not on the basis of any legal, historical or moral reason, but just because, as he says, “we must have it”.

Greenland is a self-governing territory, part of the Kingdom of Denmark which has three constituent parts: mainland Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands. Copenhagen is responsible for Greenland’s defence and foreign affairs.

Trump’s claim is so absurd, that initially it was not taken seriously. It was dismissed as another of Trump’s rants, soon to be forgotten. But on Friday (16 January), the president of the United States imposed from 1 February, 10% additional tariffs on eight European  countries that had dared question his claim: Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden, France, Germany, Netherlands and UK; with a threat that the extra tariffs  would increase to 25% on 1 June.

Is it a crises?

Unfortunately, what may first appear to be a Lillipudian soap opera, is in fact a major international crises.

First of all the tiny population of Greenland has been rattled, even though they are standing firm in the face of American advances.

Denmark, which normally prefers to blend-in in international politics, has been put in the eye of the storm, but it too has dug in, and rejected US advances.

But the biggest crises is the one developing between Europe and the US, for Greenland has brought out the best of Europe and the worst of Trump’s United States.

Europe’s principled response

European rebuff of Trumps‘s overtures has been principled, and goes beyond support for a small EU member state. The president of the European Commission summed it up in a tweet on Saturday (17 January):

 "Territorial integrity and sovereignty are fundamental principles of international law. They are essential for Europe and the international community as a whole." 

In other times the US would have applauded this position. Under Trump, international law has lost all meaning.

Greenland has focused European minds on defence and Arctic Security

The debate in Europe on defence has been going for some time, and it intensified after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. Last year the EU published a landmark white paper on defence. Greenland however focused minds. Here was the territorial integrity of a small member state being threatened, by another NATO ally no less. The rush to beef up European defence has now become a scramble.

Arctic Security

Security in the Arctic has long been neglected by the US, Europe and NATO, whilst Russia and China have been busy. Greenland has focused minds on the Arctic also.

Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom last week sent military delegations to Greenland at the invitation of the Danish government. The deployment triggered Trump’s tariff response

The eight countries said threats to impose tariffs “undermine transatlantic relations and create the risk of a dangerous spiral of escalation.” In particular, they expressed solidarity with and support for Denmark and the people of Greenland.

“We are fully in solidarity with the Kingdom of Denmark and the people of Greenland. Based on the process launched last week, we are ready for dialogue grounded in the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity, which we firmly uphold,” the statement said.

Trump’s claim based on might is right

In Trump’s White House, might is right. And this it seems goes equally to friends and allies, as it does to enemies and foes. The seasoned and adroit Economics Editor of the BBC, Faisal Islam wrote on Sunday (18 January), as he was preparing his bags bto go for Davos, for the World Economic Forum, at which another “Trump spectacular” is expected, that the threats of the US president to allies, are without parallel. He wrote, “US President Donald Trump's apparently coercive threat to force Western allies not to oppose his proposed annexation of Greenland, or face further damage to their trade with the US, is without both parallel and precedent.

We've had some unusual and unexpected economic threats from President Trump over the past year, but I think it is safe to say this exceeds all of them, and takes us into both surreal and utterly dangerous territory.

If taken at face value, it is a form of economic war being levied by the White House on its closest allies. That's because it targets allies at incredibly short notice and for a cause that essentially could break up NATO and the western alliance.”

If Trump’s ultimate objective is to break NATO, as some suspect, than he is doing very well.

US – Europe relations will never be the same again – trust is broken

Whatever happens now, transatlantic relations will never be the same again. Trust is broken, and the damage will be difficult to repair, even long after Trump has left the White House.

Europe must now wake up to reality, and responsibility. NATO needs to change if it is to survive, depending less on the US, and being more agile. Trump’s Greenland threats have poisoned US-Europe relations, but they have also shown the meaning of the word solidarity, not only within the EU, but also with non-EU European countries such as UK and Norway, as well as with Canada. From every crises, an opportunity arises.

Source: Monday Commentary is written every week by Dr Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe and Managing Editor of commonspace.eu

Photo: Protestors against Trump's pressure in the Greenland capital, Nuuk, on 17 January 2026.

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Finland hosts European Arctic Summit

Finland hosts European Arctic Summit

The Arctic summit of European leaders will be held in Rovaniemi, a municipality in Northern Finland on 13–14 September. Prime Minister Petteri Orpo has invited a group of EU leaders to the summit. The aim of the summit is to strengthen the EU’s common strategic approach to the Arctic region as its geopolitical significance continues to grow rapidly. “The Arctic region is an increasingly important part of Europe's security environment. The European Union has direct interests in its stability, security and sustainable development. It is very valuable to be able to discuss these issues together with a comprehensive group of EU leaders,” said Orpo. The summit will be attended by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk, Prime Minister of Denmark Mette Frederiksen, Prime Minister of Estonia Kristen Michal, Prime Minister of Latvia Andris Kulbergs, President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda and President of Romania Nicușor Dan. President of the European Council António Costa and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas will also take part in the summit. The summit is taking place against an extremely dynamic backdrop. In the face of accelerating climate change and geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, the economic importance of the northeast passage is growing. For 2026, more than forty million tonnes of freight are expected to pass through the Northern Sea Route for the first time, primarily due to expanded trade between Russia and China. Furthermore, in August, China launched its first regular container service through the Arctic. Finally, the EU’s Arctic policy itself is set for a reorientation: the Commission intends to present an updated Arctic strategy this autumn, in which security is to play a central role for the first time. Kaja Kallas had already advocated for this at the Arctic Frontiers conference in Tromsø earlier this year, stating that the Arctic needed more attention, more resources, and more hard power. The summit in Rovaniemi can therefore also be seen as a dress rehearsal for the new strategy. Finland brings a unique perspective to this debate: over 95 per cent of Finland’s foreign trade in goods is conducted by sea, and its ports freeze over almost every winter. This structural peculiarity has given rise to a strong export sector in the field of icebreakers: Finnish companies have designed around 80 per cent of all icebreakers worldwide and built around 60 per cent; even the US Coast Guard is having the first vessels of its new Arctic Security Cutter class built in Finland because the domestic alternative could not meet the schedule. The fact that this leverage can also be utilised geopolitically has already been successfully demonstrated. At the end of September 2022, the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs refused to grant an export licence for an LNG icebreaker ordered by the Russian mining group Norilsk Nickel, thereby bringing to an end a project that would have created around 2,100 person-years of employment. (click the image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)