Monday Commentary: Europe’s deadly war enters its fifth year

This week marks the fourth anniversary of Russia’s unprovoked attack and invasion of Ukraine, sparking a deadly European war. Despite the fact that only Ukrainian soldiers are fighting the Russian aggression, this war is a European war. Its outcome will have consequences throughout the continent.

This has been a deadly war. Tens of thousands of soldiers on both sides have been  killed. Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians have been displaced. The cost of the war unleashed by Vladimir Putin, in human, social and financial terms have been enormous, and cannot be accurately calculated as long as the fighting continues.

Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia share many common features. They also have a difficult history as Ukrainians have suffered from Russian unpleasantness many times. In February 2022 Putin persuaded himself that if he launched an all-out invasion of Ukraine, including occupying Kyiv, Ukrainians will rush to support him. They didn’t. Instead, from the first day, and to the surprise of all, including Western governments, they resisted, and Russia had to limit itself to the mainly Russian speaking areas of the Donbass. The heroic stand of the Ukrainians inspired the world, and after an embarrassing short pause, Europe threw its weight behind Ukraine.

Four years later, Ukrainians continue to fight heroically for every inch of the country’s territory. But there is no doubt that Ukraine is “damaged”. It needs the fighting to stop so that the process of healing can start.

Europe’s war

So far in this war the Ukrainians have done all the fighting to repel the Russian aggression. There are no body bags going back to Berlin, Paris, Brussels, or other European towns and villages. This has enabled the European public to remain detached, to pretend that this is not their war.

The harsh truth is that  Europe was simply not prepared. Only now – and this has nothing to do with Donald Trump’s demands – European countries, and the European Union are rushing to fill the gaps in their defence postures.

Short of engaging in combat, European support for Ukraine -political, moral, social and financial - has been generous and consistent, enabling the Ukrainians to continue the struggle, to safeguard their country, and to safeguard Europe.

The European public has by and large, acquiesced to the resolute decisions of their governments and leaders, particularly when it came to providing funds for Ukraine. But we are warned against “Ukraine fatigue”. The mainstream media that in the beginning supported Europe’s sustaining of Ukraine, is increasingly restless. And Putin apologists, including one or two EU governments, persist in undermining European unity.

Four years after Russia’s unprovoked aggression against Ukraine to need for pan-European support for Kyiv is more important than ever. This support to be sustainable must also be at the level of people. More needs to be done, and fast, to ensure that the European public understands the Ukraine issue, and why its important for them.

 Trump’s United States and Russia

Trump’s United States has betrayed Ukraine, and has betrayed Europe. Trump’s ambivalence towards Ukraine has empowered Putin, making him believe that victory was possible.

The war has had a huge cost to Russia. It has lost hundreds of thousands of soldiers; it has cost the Russian economy billions, and it has cut Russia off from Europe in no uncertain terms.

Russia is a big country, with plenty of resources. The losses it has suffered can be sustained. But its human, financial and other resources are not endless either, and there are indications that finally Putin has to start accepting these limitations.

The war must end; Ukraine must be rebuilt; relations with Russia have to be “reinvented”

The war in Ukraine must end this year! This can only happen if there is enough pressure on Putin’s Russia. Europe must sustain and increase its support for Ukraine. Fortunately leaders of the main European governments: France, Germany, UK and Poland are convinced of the importance of this, but they need to ensure the resolve of others, and of the European public.

The support of the US is essential. Trump can end the war, not by agreeing to Russia’s terms, but by increasing pressure on Russia. There is still widespread support for Ukraine in American body-politic. Now is the time to show it.

Ones the fighting stops the challenging task of rebuilding Ukraine – not just the infrastructure, but also the spirit of the Ukrainian nation – starts. In this Europe must lead, and EU accession is major and essential step that must happen quickly. Ukraine is a big country, damaged by war, and the EU will not digest it easily. For Europe however this is the ultimate test which it must pass honourable.

And finally, once the guns are silent, what to do with Russia? Russia is too big, too important, and too close, to be ignored. However, under Putin Russia will remain a danger for its neighbours, for Europe, and ultimately, for the world.

Relations with Russia will have to be re-invented. Europe must never again deal with Russia from a position of weakness or dependence. The decision of Finland and Sweden to abandon neutrality and join NATO, after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, has shown the way.

A strong Europe can open a new dialogue with Moscow. But after Ukraine, trust will take a long time to build.

source: Monday Commentary is written for commonspace.eu by Dr Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe, and Managing Editor of commonspace.eu

photo: War graves in Ukraine

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)