Netanyahu declares victory over Iran, rules out Lebanon withdrawal

The Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, has hailed a historic victory over Iran and ruled out an immediate withdrawal from Lebanon on Monday (15 June). He said that Israel’s forces would remain there “for as long as necessary”.

“We established deep security zones around the state of Israel. We did this in Gaza, in Lebanon and in Syria,” the Israeli prime minister said in a televised press conference on Monday. “And I want to make it clear: we will remain in these security zones … to protect our country.”

He claimed that the US-Israeli war against Iran had spared Israel from “nuclear annihilation”, and that the destruction and timing of the campaign was necessary in order to prevent Iran from having nuclear weapons. 

The exact details of the interim deal between the US and Iran are still unclear. The Guardian reports that it might “include a ceasefire in Lebanon, where Israel launched a wide-ranging offensive after attacks on northern Israel by Hezbollah at the beginning of the 15-week-long conflict”.

US officials said on Monday (15 June) that the withdrawal of Israeli forces was not a condition of a pact between the US ‌and ‌Iran, and Israel would have the right to defend itself against attacks by Hezbollah. It should be noted that details of the Memorandum of Understanding between the US and Iran are still very much unclear, and JD Vance said that the framework is ‘very general’ with many details yet to be negotiated.

“The MoU … is about a page and half so it ‌is a very general document,” Vance said on CNN on Monday night. “On a number of issues, we are going to have ‌to figure this stuff out during the technical negotiation phase.”

Israeli media has framed the outcome as an “abject failure”. Israel had strongly opposed Iranian attempts to make any interim agreement with the US conditional on ending Israeli strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Opposition figures in Israel have also moved quickly to criticise the deal. With elections due before October, and the race expected to be closely contested, the agreement is likely to become a major political issue. Netanyahu said on Monday that he intended to stand in the election and win.

Yair Golan, leader of the centre-left Democrats, accused Netanyahu of allowing “military achievements won through the courage of [Israel’s armed forces] to be erased”.

“Trump signs an agreement that funnels billions to the ayatollahs’ regime, leaves the nuclear infrastructure intact, preserves the ballistic [missile] threat as it is, and throws a lifeline to the murderous regime in Tehran,” Golan said.

Naftali Bennett, the former prime minister and one of Netanyahu’s main challengers in the upcoming election, said Netanyahu was “incapable of achieving a decisive victory” and had dragged Israel into wars of “stagnation and attrition”.

Far-right members of Netanyahu’s governing coalition urged Israel to disregard the terms of the deal, arguing that the country had not taken part in the negotiations and was therefore not bound by the agreement.

“We are not party to this agreement. It does not safeguard our security,” National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir wrote on Telegram.

Source: commonspace.eu with The Guardian 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)