Editorial: Armenia votes

Expectations in and out of Armenia about these elections, have been modest. Internally political cynicism is the order of the day. Externally, western governments hope for small steps forward.

This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

On Sunday, 2 April, Armenians will go to the polls to vote in parliamentary elections. Following recent constitutional amendments the party that forms the majority chooses the Prime Minister who will in turn form the government. As from next year Armenia will also turn into a parliamentary republic, so the Prime Minister will replace the president as the country's effective leader.

Armenian politics is broken in many ways. It is built on an extreme form of clientelism, which in a country where a large part of the population is still under the poverty line, very often determines the result of elections. It is also prone to regular outbursts of violence: the incidents in the Parliament in 1999; the violence following the 2008 presidential elections, and the incidents in Erebuni in 2016 are some examples.

Expectations in and out of Armenia about these elections have been modest. Internally political cynicism is the order of the day. Externally, western governments hope for small steps forward.

So far the electoral process has been reasonably free. Parties were, by and large, able to campaign freely, and had some access to the main television stations. The voters have a choice between nine political parties and blocs providing a range of policy options, and despite rumours of back-room deals that should not be dismissed lightly, the elections remain competitive. The elections up to now however have been far from fair. A statement by the EU, US, UK and Germany on 29 March, stated:

"We are aware of and concerned by allegations of voter intimidation, attempts to buy votes, and the systemic use of administrative resources to aid certain competing parties. We continue to urge all parties engaged in the election to abide by the letter and spirit of Armenia's electoral law, and call upon relevant law enforcement authorities and electoral institutions to implement existing laws in an unbiased and credible manner." (You can read the statement in full here)

Whilst the electoral process has been reasonably well managed so far, there are concerns that the voter's list has been artificially inflated. A final assessment of the elections will only be possible based also on what happens on election day, and in the counting process. Particular attention needs to be put to ensure that secrecy of the ballot is upheld.  Hundreds of international observers and thousands of domestic monitors will contribute to providing a final assessment. It is regrettable that at least one credible international observation mission was refused accreditation by the CEC.

The statement of the international community earlier this week concluded with a hope that "the ultimate result of the election will pave the way to a future of prosperity, peace, and progress. The Armenian people deserve as much." We can only agree.

This editorial was prepared by the editorial team of Commonspace.eu

related material on commonspace.eu

Commentary: In Armenia has everything changed so that everything can remain the same

There will be a live blog on the Armenian elections starting at 14.00 Yerevan time (11.00 CET) on Saturday 1 April 2017 on commonspace.eu

photo: Armenians voting in the 2012 parliamentary elections (picture courtesy of osce.org)

 

You can follow the Armenian elections on a live blog on commonspace.eu from 1-3 April 2017. The live blog starts at 11.00 CET (14.00 Yerevan) on Saturday, 1 April and ends at 15.00 CET (17.00 Yerevan) on Monday 3 April.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)