Uzbek speakers under pressure in Afghanistan and Russia

This commentary first appeared in the Briefing Section of Central Asia Concise issue of 22nd January 2026.

Reports of Uzbek language and culture suppression in Afghanistan

Local reports coming out of northern Afghanistan detail the disappearance of public signs in Uzbek and Persian. While sporadic at first, the removals have begun causing a stir on social media, with locals complaining about increasing numbers of Uzbek signs disappearing from public streets and buildings. Further causes of concern that the Taliban government may be looking to suppress or at least limit the use of the Uzbek language are reports that the university in Samangan province may have also removed Uzbek signs in its facilities. Concrete information on this phenomenon remains limited, and the Uzbek government has been carefully monitoring the situation. Recently, Uzbek Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Akhror Burkhanov publicly stated that the Taliban government denied any attempts to undermine the use of the Uzbek language within their borders after discussions between the two governments.

Unfortunately for Uzbek-speaking Afghans, this recent development is only the latest out of a series of actions that point towards the Taliban government taking steps to suppress Uzbek, as well as other Central Asian languages and cultures within its borders. In late 2025, it became apparent that the Taliban government was dismissing thousands of its ethnic Tajik and Uzbek security forces, particularly in the northern Tajik and Uzbek ethnic majority provinces of Badakhshan, Kapisa, Parwan, and Takhar. The removal of these forces is obviously problematic for the representation of Tajik and Uzbek minorities in Afghanistan’s security apparatus, but perhaps more importantly for the security situation in general, as the Taliban government justified the action as an overall personnel reduction to save costs, and so far, it seems not to have compensated for these cuts in any way. The presence of the Islamic State – Khorasan Province (ISKP), as well as the militant groups responsible for recent killings along the Tajik border, makes an overall reduction of security forces, especially targeting those with local knowledge, a dangerous proposition. In fact, last week has seen further bloodshed on the Afghan-Tajik border as a firefight resulted in the deaths of four suspected Islamic militants, marking the latest occurrence in a series of incidents that have been escalating since last year. The cuts to security personnel continue to alarm ethnic Uzbeks as they follow previous tensions between Uzbek and Pashtun communities, occasionally spilling over into open protests, as well as the removal of a monument to the Uzbek scholar and poet Mir Alisher Navoi in Mazar-e-Sharif.

This issue of potential Uzbek language and culture repression would stand in stark contrast to relations between the two neighboring countries in the last year. Uzbekistan has been eagerly demonstrating its desire to pursue a cooperative relationship with Afghanistan, capping off 2025 by sending 20 food and medical supply trucks to the northern and directly bordering Afghan province of Balkh. As detailed in previous newsletters, Uzbekistan remains the most involved Central Asian state in driving Afghan integration into the region, repeatedly pushing for closer relations with the Taliban government, underpinned by deeper trade and connectivity across the border. The Afghan government has made sure to publicly explain the disappearing signs as ongoing work to standardize signage throughout Afghan higher education institutions, and that the Uzbek language is under no threat under its government. To further underscore this point, Afghan authorities also announced the launch of a new Uzbek Language and Literature faculty at Jowzjan State University for master’s level students. Clearly, both governments are eager to prevent the topic from becoming a wider issue, but in an information space as controlled as the one in Afghanistan, the sudden spike in social media complaints about the sign issues is certainly something to consider.

Violence against labor migrants in Russia

Central Asian labor migrants to Russia face intensifying peril as security forces escalate raids on migrant communities. Notably, a raid on a café in Khabarovsk known as a gathering spot for Central Asian migrants, resulted in mass beatings as well as a death at the hands of Russian security services. Uzbekistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that it had sent a diplomatic note to Russia, calling for an impartial investigation into the death and repatriation of the body. The raid is not new or unexpected, as conditions for Central Asian migrants have drastically deteriorated since the Crocus City Hall attack in 2024 by Tajik terrorists for which ISKP publicly claimed responsibility.

The death of an Uzbek labor migrant as a direct result of the beatings suffered by Russian security forces marks a dark milestone for Central Asian migrants in the country. The raid has sparked outrage on Uzbek social media and an active discussion on the increasing risks for Uzbeks to venture to Russia in search of better job opportunities. Politician Alisher Qodirov of the National Revival Democratic Party called for all Uzbeks to leave Russia as soon as possible, echoing much of the indignation on social media. However, things are not that simple, as many Uzbeks are still very much dependent on Russian employment. Russia remains the main destination for all Central Asian labor migrants, even after the increasing hostility, with massive amounts of remittances transferred to Uzbekistan as a result. It is estimated that in the first half of 2025 alone, Uzbekistan received 8.2 billion USD in cross-border transfers from Russia, with total remittances for 2025 expected to be around 20 billion USD. Uzbek economic scientist Abdulla Abdukadirov and deputy director of the Uzbek President’s Agency for Strategic Reforms highlighted the significance of these remittances by comparing the 20 billion sum to the annual state budget of 28 billion USD. If this latest escalation will lead to sharp decreases in Uzbek migrants seeking work in Russia remains to be seen.

Unfortunately, this trend of violence so far shows no signs of slowing down. Raids are now often accompanied by violent ultra-nationalist groups such as the ‘Russkaya Obshchina’ (Russian Community, RO), which preaches ethno-nationalism through a violent ‘reconquest’ of Russia on its popular social media pages. Many members of these groups are veterans of Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine and contribute to the militarized nature of these groups. Even more worryingly, there have been reports of raids by RO without the involvement of law enforcement, causing further concern that the Russian state is allowing these groups to operate with impunity.

source: This commentary first appeared in the Briefing Section of Central Asia Concise issue of 22nd January 2026.

photo: The Uzbek-Afghan border

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)