The Kremlin prefers force over development in the North Caucasus

The much heralded development programme for the North Caucasus, launched by the Presidential envoy Alexandr Khloponin when he was appointed two years ago, appears to be stagnating. Khloponin was this week in the Dagestani Capital Makhachkala where he met the leader of Dagestan Magomedsalam Magomedov and other local officials to discuss preparations for the forthcoming Russian parliamentary election and other issues. Despite appeals from Magomedov for Moscow to move ahead with the development programme Khloponin said that this had now been postponed until May 2012 as a minimum.

The Russian newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta commented that Khloponin's statement sounded strange, because as early as in July 2011 the Ministry of Regional Development drafted a programme for the development of the Northern Caucasus for the period ending in 2025, whose value was about 4,000 billion roubles, with 2,600 billion coming from the federal budget. The figures would not look so impressive, if they were compared with some 5,000 billion roubles, to be spent on the rearmament of troops of the Southern Military District.

The newspaper adds that sources in the government report that even the sum of 2,600 billion roubles, planned for the coming 14 years (less than 200 billion roubles a year) seemed to be too large for the Finance Ministry, although, according to the programme, the main social and economic indices of the Northern Caucasus will be lower than the average figures for the Russian Federation. For instance, the average nominal calculated wages in the Northern Caucasus are to grow from 10,000 roubles to 23,000 roubles. In other words, they will be smaller than the average wages in Russia today.

In contrast to this, the ambitious programme for the modernisation of Military and security forces in the North Caucasus was given a boost this week with the visit of President Dimitri Medvedev to the Southern Military District Command in Vladikavkaz. According to the Press Service of the Russian President the subjects discussed included new arms and equipment for the armed forces, higher service pay, and better service conditions. The European missile defence issue was also discussed. Earlier reports in the Russian media indicated that the process of modernisation of the Armed Forces was already very advanced in the North Caucasus when compared to other military regions.

For some time the Kremlin has been balancing a tough military and security posture in the North Caucasus with plans for a generous development programme aimed at addressing the root causes of the insurgency that has distabilised the region over the last decade. It seems now that it is abandoning, or at least much reducing its development programme, whilst generously supporting its military build up.

In Makhachkala Presidential envoy Khloponin also spoke about the need to boost civil society institutions and strenghten the judiciary. "The development of civil society institutions and an independent judicial system are the main instruments for counteracting corruption. These are two key factors that should significantly affect negative processes which are taking shape in the public", Regnum news agency quoted him as saying. However many consider that these are empty words unless they can be backed up with an ambitious economic development programme that can bring the region into the 21st century.

source: commonspace.eu with reporting from Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Regnum News Agency, Itar-Tass and kremlin.ru

photo: President Medvedev arriving for a meeting with officers of the Southern Military District at the 58th Army headquarters, with Army General Nikolai Makarov, the chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces (right) on Monday, 21 November 2011. (Picture courtesy of the Press Service of the president of Russia).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)