Commentary: Central Asia is safer together

Whilst it is often the case that the five Central Asian republics are lumped together and seen by outsiders as one group, in truth there are between them huge differences, a lot of competition, some rivalry, and every now and then, some conflict, writes the commonspace.eu editorial team.

The big two, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, are often perceived to be in competition with each other. The two have different strengths and weaknesses, which means that if they play their cards right they can turn this competition into a healthy collaborative relationship with a win-win situation.

This is what appears to be happening at the moment.

Kazakh President, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, met his Uzbek counterpart Shavkat Mirziyoyev in Shymkent on 3 March to discuss “trade and prospects for strengthening allied relations between the two countries”. The Kazakh presidential administration described the meeting as “informal”.

The two leaders appear to have two priorities. The first is to co-ordinate positions in the face of what appears to be considerable pressure from Moscow for the two countries to tow the line and stay in the fold, at a time when the Kremlin feels embattled due to the ongoing war in Ukraine. 

The second priority of the two presidents seems to be a desire to ensure that the many documents on major areas of co-operation, including the treaty on allied relations and an agreement on border demarcation, which they signed during Tokayev’s state visit to Tashkent in December 2022, are realised and fulfilled.  The 40 agreements signed in December envisioned 40 economic initiatives worth $2.5 billion. 

The official statement at the end of the meeting said that: 

“in Shymkent, the presidents focused on trade and economic cooperation, including opportunities for strengthening mutual trade, attracting investments, and expanding collaboration in the industrial, energy, agricultural, transportation, and logistics sectors. They also exchanged views on regional issues.”

Both countries are very cautiously exploring political reforms, and more boldly, seeking economic reform. The two leaders are firmly entrenched, but are vulnerable to threats, including from their own elites. They appear to be developing strong personal bonds, which can be very useful, especially in times of crisis.

The meeting in Shymkent came immediately after the two leaders received in their respective capitals US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken. Making a point of going to both Astana and Tashkent, Blinken once more emphasised the importance of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in the region, and no doubt encouraged the two to increase the co-operation between them.

Image
a
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Central Asian foreign ministers last week. westernslopenow.com

Blinken signals a firm but nuanced US approach to Central Asia

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Central Asia last week, first going to Astana where he met President Tokayev and where he participated in the regular meeting of the C5+1 – a forum bringing together the five Central Asian nations with the United States. He then went on to Tashkent to meet President Mirziyoyev.

In the region Blinken took the opportunity to restate the US position towards the Central Asian republics namely, “enduring support for their sovereignty, for their independence, for their territorial integrity”, and US “determination that each be able to determine their own futures consistent with those principles.”

But Blinken was quick to also add the economic dimension of the US relationship with the region. He stated:

“a big part of the work that we’re doing here is to help the region diversify trade relationships, to build new partnerships and relationships with other countries, including with the United States, so they’re not dependent on any one country or any one source for trade and investment, and at the same time to increase trade and investment within Central Asia itself.  There’s a very strong potential market here, and the more connectivity we have among the countries of Central Asia, the more collaboration we have, the stronger that market’s going to be, the more investment it’s going to attract from outside of Central Asia.”

Blinken however made it clear that the US will move cautiously:

“Central Asia is in a complicated part of the world with longstanding relationships with different countries based on history, based on geography, and that’s something that we well understand. But I think we also see each of these countries looking to multiply and deepen their relationships and partnerships with other countries around the world.  And in that, the United States wants to be a steadfast partner and a partner that works with them to create new opportunities for people in this region and new opportunities for us to work together.”

The visit of the US Secretary of State to Central Asia was as timely as it was important. As the region works to break out of its Russian straightjacket, an intelligent and well calibrated US approach is hugely important.

Image
a
Non-Aligned Movement meeting on COVID-19 recovery on 2 March 2023 in Baku. APA.

 Guests of honour in Baku

On 2 March, Azerbaijan hosted a meeting of the contact group of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) focusing on the recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic. Azerbaijan currently holds the Chairmanship of the Movement, which has around 120 member states, mostly in the global south. Whilst most delegations were led by the vice-presidents, prime ministers or foreign ministers, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan were represented by their presidents, and they were clearly the guests of honour at the event.

Baku has been seeking for some time to nurture relations with the Central Asian republics and it appears to be making progress. Azerbaijan is keen to consolidate connectivity links with Central Asia, and to provide the alternative corridor for the export of energy and other goods from the region to European markets. But there is also a political angle. Azerbaijan has generally been supported by Central Asian countries in its dispute with Armenia. It also sees the Central Asian republics as allies in its efforts to manage relations with Moscow. 

So the presence in Baku of the presidents of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan was very well received by the Azerbaijani leadership, and reflects a broader sense of increased co-operation between Azerbaijan and the Central Asian region.

source: commonspace.eu editorial team
photo: Akorda press service
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)