Caspian Ministers in tough negotiations ahead of regional summit in Astrakhan in September.

The Foreign Ministers of the five Caspian littoral countries met in Moscow yesterday to discuss issues related to the region and to prepare for the next summit of Caspian leaders which will be held in Astrakhan in the summer. The Presidents of Azerbaijan, Kazhakstan, Iran, Russia and Turkmenistan last met in Baku in 2010.

Comments made by the representatives of the five states after the Moscow meeting indicate that some tough negotiations are ongoing as each state tries to protect its interests. Russia and Iran are particularly keen to keep other countries apart from the littoral five out of the sea, both militarily and economically.

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif stressed that the common goal of the Caspian states is to prevent a military buildup in the region and "to turn the Caspian Sea into a sea of peace, friendliness and stability, to refrain from an arms race, to give up the use of military force and to prevent the non-coastal states from deploying their troops These are the major conditions to secure peace and stability in the region," said Zarif.

The Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Moscow sees a need for enhanced cooperation between the countries bordering the Caspian Sea to boost discussion on mutual issues. "It is obvious now that the shared trans-Caspian agenda necessitates the strengthening of further cooperation mechanisms and, possibly, the creation of new forums to ensure the effectiveness of efforts," the Russian News Agency RIA-Novosti quoted Lavrov as saying.

Both Russia and Iran have been keen to exclude and US or EU presence in the Caspian Sea and hope that they could enshrine provisions on this in a new Caspian Convention. However no agreement on such a convention has been reached yet, and it seems that at their meeting in Moscow the foreign ministers left all the hard decisions to be taken by their Presidents when they meet in September.

Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan have emerged as pivitol countries in defining the future of the Caspian. The two countries have some differences over the delineations of their respective zones in the Caspian Basin but Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, speaking on his return to Baku, dismissed rumours of problems and was quite upbeat on the results of the meeting.The minister said that Azerbaijan plans to turn the Caspian Sea into a sea of cooperation and security, adding that in Moscow "the parties have made a big step in determining the status of the sea." Mammadyarov added that all five countries are interested in making progress on this issue and another meeting will be held in Tehran at the level of deputy ministers in June." The Minister said that if necessary the Foreign Ministers will meet again before the September Summit in Astrakhan.

Speaking in Baku at an international conference, Azerbaijani Energy Minister Natig Aliyev said that "an energy corridor is being created between the Caspian region and Europe, which begins in Azerbaijan and will extend up to Italy." The Minister said that more than $ 50 billion will be required to ensure the gas supply as part of the second phase of development of Azerbaijani offshore gas condensate Shah Deniz field to the European market. The Minister said that the proven oil reserves of the region were now estimated at between 3.5% - 4%, while the proven gas reserves were estimated at between 7%-11% of the proven world reserves. The Minister added that hydrocarbon reserves of the Caspian region will double by 2035 as a result of new findings.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The Foreign Ministers of the five Caspian Sea states at their meeting in Moscow on 22 April 2014 (picture courtesy of RIA NovostI).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)