Armenia may get EU’s financing for enhancing the security of its NPP

We have in the EU budget around 70 million euros per year, which we can spend for the safety of nuclear power plants outside the EU. In theory Armenia could get part of this money to reassess its NPP and also to improve it, Marlene Holzner, Spokesperson of the European Commissioner for Energy, said in an interview to ArmInfo.

“But of course, Armenia has to ask for the money first,” she said.

She exlained that June 27 2011 Armenia, Belarus, Russia, Ukraine, Croatia, Turkey and Switzerland signed a declaration to do similar stress-test for all the nuclear power plants existing in their territories.

“We have developed criteria to reassess NPPs after Fukushima. So, they will have to test if they are able to cope with earthquakes and other disasters that may happen in their region. Of course, it is not that we have tsunami everywhere, but we have different conditions. We know that all of the plants have had such tests before, otherwise, they could have never operated but we want to know more. We want to know their safety margin. We could say we had x and now we ask x plus 20%,” Holzner said.

She said that Armenia has promised that it will do this test, which also will include airplane crushes and terrorist attacks.

“If you think about the World Trade Center, al-Qaeda had a high jet airplane and went into a nuclear power plant,” Holzner explained.

She said that the test has three levels: the 1st – by NPP operator, who will just answer the questions, the 2nd - a national level (a ministry or an agency which normally controls NPP and gives a license). “Here, you will need in Armenia somebody, a ministry or an agency, which will check all the answers of the nuclear power plant, and will say, yes, it is credible or not. For example, if you have Russian model, or French, you can say if it can withstand or not,” Holzner said.

“The 3rd level will be international. Armenia has accepted it also. Experts from other countries will check what Armenia has. That means that, maybe, British, Italian or French nuclear experts will look at what is in the record. Since we have not set down the details yet, they will have to look at the nuclear power plant on the spot with their own eyes and then see what we think it is,” Holzner said.

She explained that they have not set down a detailed plan of action because the June declaration was the first step, and afterwards it was agreed that they would continue discussion on the details.

“The plan is that Armenia has to fulfill the 2nd and 3rd steps transparently: it needs to be public and it needs to be published,” Holzner said.


Prepared by Oksana Musaelyan

(c) commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.
Editor's choice
News
Medical Students stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus

Medical Students stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus

Medical Students in Tbilisi have participated in the campaign LANDMINE FREE SOUTH CAUCASUS 2026. The regional’ Landmine Free South Caucasus’ (LFSC) campaign was initiated by LINKS Europe Foundation in 2018 to address the critical issue of landmine and unexploded ordnance contamination in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. With significant landmine contamination in the region posing an ongoing threat to life and eliciting high economic costs, LFSC advocated for a regional, holistic approach to complete clearance.  Future Doctors Join the Conversation on Friday, 16 October in Tbilisi. "As part of the Landmine Free South Caucasus 2026 campaign, an informative and interactive meeting was held in Tbilisi with medical students. The session was conducted by George Simonishvili, South Caucasus Co-ordinator for LINKS Europe.  The meeting focused on the humanitarian consequences of landmines and other explosive remnants of war in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, with particular attention to the Red Bridge minefield near the borders of the three countries, and emphasised that these dangers remain a current humanitarian challenge. It also underlined that future medical professionals will encounter the long-term effects of explosion injuries and can play a role in awareness and prevention.  Students actively engaged throughout the discussion, showing strong interest in the humanitarian impact and the need for cooperation. Under the slogan "Future Doctors for a Landmine Free South Caucasus," the event encouraged students to support public awareness, solidarity with survivors, and a safer South Caucasus free from landmine threats.  The event was organised by LINKS Europe as part of LFSC26.  "Medical Students Stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus," "Future Doctors, Safer Futures: Together Against Landmines." "Future Doctors for a Landmine Free South Caucasus".

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)