Caspian entanglement.

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

On Wednesday, Russia said it had fired 26 missiles at 11 targets in north and north-west Syria. The missiles were fired from ships of Russia's Caspian Flotilla about 1,500km (930 miles) away. On Thursday, Russia reiterated that all the rockets hit their targets, despite the fact that American sources insist that four of the missiles fell on Iranian territory.

Russia's decision to throw its full military weight behind the government of Syrian President Basher al Assad has irritated western countries, as well as many Arab states who have in the past five years put in considerable effort to try to topple the Baathist regime in Damascus. Ostensibly Russia has intervened in Syria in order to attack the forces of the so-called "Islamic State" (ISIL) which it sees as also being a long term threat to its own security. Fighters from the North Caucasus are reported to be among the most efficient of the ISIL warriors, and there is fear that they will soon return home to continue their jihad in the North Caucasus. However it became obvious from the very first day of the operation that the Russian objectives in Syria were far from limited to striking ISIL. Russia's neo-imperial ambitions have now reached the shores of the Mediterranean. The choice to use the Caspian Flotilla for the missile strikes is also not a coincidence. It connects the Caspian and the East Mediterranean theatres of operation in a most dramatic fashion. It sends a message to the countries in between that they should not stand in the way.

There are many reasons why the Caspian Region, the Black Sea Region, the East Mediterranean and the Gulf region can be seen as part of a larger super region. Indeed the economic potential of this super region, if it is able to develop peacefully,is enormous. The countries of the South Caucasus - Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, are at the heart of this super region and can contribute much to it, and in turn benefit immensely. Unfortunately this super-region is riddled with conflicts, some like in Syria, very much alive, others like the Karabakh conflict simmering and ready to erupt. Entangling the Caspian with the conflict in Syria is the last thing the region needed. By doing so the Russian government has once more shown that it will stop at nothing in the process of achieving its neo-imperial ambitions. The incidents between Russian forces on Turkey's borders with Syria further add to the tensions in the region. NATO has taken these incidents very seriously and has made clear its commitment to Turkey as a long time ally and member of the alliance. NATO, which in the immediate aftermath of the end of the cold-war, had become a rather sleepy organisation, has already had to step-up significantly in the last two years following events in Ukraine. The situation on the south-east borders of the alliance now introduces a new sense of urgency.

Military solutions offer no long term way out, for the problems in Syria, in Nagorno-Karabakh nor elsewhere. Countries, be they global or regional powers, or small states, must come together in dialogue to address both the immediate challenges as well as the core issues that underpin them. The rule of law must return to international relations as the basis from which the current crises can start being addressed. The time for a piecemeal approach is over. While each situation has its own dynamics and specificities there are clearly bigger issues at play, with an impact way beyond the immediate location of the ongoing conflicts. In the same way that NATO has stepped-up its military role, other international organisations whose mandate it is to solve problems peacefully need to do likewise. As must the European Union on whose immediate borders conflicts are raging with increased consequences. Governments have a duty to help bring this about, but civil society needs also to break out of its complacency. We are in a period of grave danger for global peace. Locally, regionally and globally, the voices of reason need to be heard before it is too late.

source: This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

photo: The trajectory of the missiles fired from Russia's Caspian Flotilla at targets in Syria on Wednesday, 7 October 2015. (Image courtesy of the BBC).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)