Baku 2015 - a tale of two cities.

This is an op-ed by Dennis Sammut, contributed to commonspace.eu

The 1st European Games open in Baku on 12 June 2015. It is an occasion for celebration for the six thousand athletes participating and for those who enjoy sports in its different forms. This event has however divided Azerbaijani society, as well as international public opinion. Some have questioned the wisdom of spending billions of dollars on sports in a country that still lacks many necessities in the fields of health and education. Others point to the arrests of dozens of human rights activists and journalists in the run up to the games. The Azerbaijani government on its part says that this criticism is orchestrated by enemies of Azerbaijan, and is based on double standards. It dismisses any claims of repression saying that all those arrested have broken the law in one form or the other.

These different views represent the very stark contradictions of contemporary Azerbaijan - on the one hand a country that has modernised and made tremendous progress in a very short time, on the other hand a country whose institutions often appear untouched by change, and continue to be managed in Brezhnev era style, some by people who were appointed during the Brezhnev era. The contradictions are everywhere - from the quality of life of the people, some enjoying prosperous living, others hardly having access to decent education and health care - down to the way that Azerbaijan communicates with the outside world, with sleek public relations firms and Soviet style propagandists dishing out daily contradictory messages to their heart's content.

Baku in 2015 is therefore a tale of two cities, and no one should dismiss either lightly or categorically because there is truth in both.

Fariz Ismailizade, a respected academic at Azerbaijan's Diplomatic Academy wrote on his facebook page on the eve of the Games,

"Today is the last day of preparations for the 1st European Games. Tomorrow will be the grand opening. Seeing so much colour, passion, energy, youthfulness in this city, I am absolutely convinced that it will be the best day in the thousands years long history of Baku and this nation. And some can say whatever they want about the purpose of these games. But the matter of the fact is that this nation, torn with war, poverty, desperation and occupation only 2 decades ago, has managed to transform itself to the levels which developed nations didn't achieve in such a short period of time and pulled together such a world class event with its own resources and this once again proves that this nation and this country does deserve an independent statehood and is capable to governing its own future. Congratulations, Azerbaijan !!!! Feeling very proud".

Emin Milli, an Azerbaijani dissident and former political prisoner who now manages an independent media outlet, Meidan TV, from exile in Berlin, wrote,

"As ‪Azerbaijan prepares to roll out the red carpet to European athletes, a number of journalists and activists are languishing in jails."

Elmira Khadijova, the mother of  one of those prisoners, journalist Khadija Ismailova, told Meidan TV,

"Personally, I will not watch these games. I am over 70 years old. Instead, I want to see Azerbaijan's open-minded, free thinking individuals released from the prison."

The success of critics to capture the attention of world public opinion has alarmed the Government of Azerbaijan. Many close to the Azerbaijani leadership have now convinced themselves that there is a conspiracy against their country, and an attempt by western countries to force regime change in Azerbaijan. This is dismissed as sheer fantasy by politicians and diplomats dealing with the country in western capitals.  Indeed many countries genuinely want Azerbaijan to succeed both politically and economically, and have constantly advised the government and its opponents to compromise and dialogue, rather than confront each other. There is however increased frustration in the international community at the actions of the Azerbaijani government. The decision to close down the Baku office of the OSCE, a few days before the start of the Baku Games, was greeted with astonishment and cited as yet another example of how Azerbaijan shoots itself in the foot.

There is some reason to believe that Baku's paranoia is being fed by a third country, whose interest it is to see Azerbaijan isolated. The government of Azerbaijan must not fall into this trap.

As long as Azerbaijan remains a part of the international community and the family of European nations, including through its membership of the Council of Europe and the OSCE and its partnership with the European Union, all of which demand from their members high standards in respect to human rights and good governance, it must expect rigorous scrutiny of its record in these fields. This is not interference in sovereignty but a process of solidarity between countries who share common values.

However those criticising Azerbaijan also need to be more targeted and focused in their criticism. Sheer outright condemnations are not useful for anybody.

For the reasons that Fariz Ismailizade mentioned, the Baku Games, with all their controversy, are an important moment for Azerbaijan, and one can only wish that they are successful -  an occasion  to celebrate unity in sports, as well as the European character and achievements of the modern Azerbaijani Republic.

Beyond the fun and games there are however more important issues. Once these games end the Azerbaijan leadership must take stock of the situation and take some hard decisions. In many ways the Baku 2015 Games have become a defining moment for Azerbaijan, not for what actually will happen during the time of the games, but for what will happen immediately after.

source: Dennis Sammut contributed this op-ed for commonspace.eu. Dennis Sammut is the Director of LINKS (Dialogue, Analysis and Research). 

photo: Soviet era style Government Building in the centre of Baku, illuminated ahead of the Baku 2015 games (picture courtesy of baku 2015).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)