“Azadliq” newspaper under threat of closure. Marion Kipiani reports about developments at one of the most popular newspapers.in Azerbaijan.

On 5 November, the Yasamal District Court in Baku notified the editors of the “Azadliq” (“Freedom”) newspaper that the publication’s bank accounts would be frozen. This decision was related to a court verdict against “Azadliq” in a libel suit brought by businessman Anar Mammadov, the son of Azerbaijani transport minister Ziya Mammadov.

Mr Mammadov had filed a complaint against the opposition “Azadliq” and “Yeni Musavat” newspapers for an article printed in July 2010, which reported that Mr Mammadov had paid one million manat (approximately 1m Euros) during the Gabala Music Festival in order to have a bear slaughtered for a barbecue. In January 2012, the Yasamal District Court had ordered the newspaper to pay a fine of 4,200 manat, a decision that was later upheld by the Baku Court of Appeal.

According to the newspaper’s first deputy editor, Rahim Hajili, “Azadliq” had been notified a week earlier that it was due to pay the fine but had filed a judicial complaint against the decision. In such case, Mr Hajili noted in comments to the “Caucasian Knot” news website, the court order should be suspended. “The illegal seizure of the paper’s bank accounts paralyzes its activities, which actually entails criminal liability for obstructing the legitimate activities of journalists," Mr Hajili told the “Caucasian Knot”, adding that in his view the court decisions had a political background. “Seizure of the accounts is one more step toward the elimination of opposition papers.”

“Azadliq”, ideologically close to the opposition Popular Front Party of Azerbaijan and critical to the current government, has been published since December 1989. With a print-run of 9,000, and a readership estimated to be rather higher due to the sharing of copies, it is one the best-selling papers in the country. In recent years, however, “Azadliq” has repeatedly faced problems. In March and April 2011, two of its journalists, Seymour Khaziyev and Ramin Deco, were abducted one shortly after the other, threatened and subjected to physical and psychological pressure in order to abandon critical reporting, according to information released by press freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders. Due to changes in the newspaper distribution network in Azerbaijan, “Azadliq” and other publications also have increasing difficulties to reach their audience. The GASID distribution company, which serves mainly independent and opposition-leaning newspapers, has had many of its own newsstands shut down, while other kiosks either do not carry newspapers at all or do so only in insufficient numbers.

“Azadliq” currently faces also fines from other court cases brought against it in the past year. Apart from the complaint of Mr Mammadov, these include claims brought by the head of the Baku Metro system, member of parliament Novruzali Aslanov, and the head of the “Bina” Shopping Centre in Baku. The cumulated amount of fines imposed on the paper totals more than 65,000 manat. At the same time, the GASID distribution company owes “Azadliq” approximately 35,000 manats in unpaid revenues. This in turn leads to the paper’s arrears with the state publishing house, which regularly threatens to cease printing of “Azadliq”, Rahim Hajili told the “Caucasian Knot.”

In comments on the libel case brought by Mr Mammadov against “Azadliq”, Ali Hasanov, Head of Department on Social Political Issues of the Presidential Administration, said the Azerbaijani authorities could not “restrict the rights of citizens to protect their honour and dignity in the courts, as well as the rights of courts to consider and take decisions on these matters.” Mr Hasanov noted that it was up to the media to comply with professional ethics and uphold the rights of citizens, contact.az and “Caucasian Knot” report.

But Ali Kerimli, leader of the Popular Front Party of Azerbaijan, said in the framework of a public hearing organised by the Institute for Reporter Freedom and Safety (IRFS) in Baku on 13 November, that “everyone knows that the courts in Azerbaijan are dependent on the executive branch.” Therefore, Mr Kerimli stated, the courts took verdicts against “Azadliq” according to political orders. This should be seen as part of the preparations for “not free presidential elections in October 2013” in Azerbaijan. “If "Azadlig" will be shut down, an important channel to inform the public about violations of human rights will be eliminated. The day after, almost no one will write anymore about the arbitrariness of public officials,” Mr Kerimli cautioned the participants of the public hearing, as reported by the “Caucasian Knot”.

The Intelligentsia Forum of Azerbaijan, a public organisation uniting prominent scientists, writers and journalists, describes the court order against “Azadliq” not only an incident of pressure on the newspaper itself but on “democracy and democracy initiatives as well as fundamental freedom” more generally. In a public appeal, the Forum emphasises that over the past years, “Azadliq” “journalists have been arrested, beaten, insulted and forced into emigration. The newspaper has been removed from its office and placed into premises unfavourable for work. It continually faces unjust court decisions for bigger fines.” The appeal ends by calling on the Azerbaijani authorities to cease all steps directed toward the suppression of the paper and to remove all claims against it.

On the international level, a similar statement has been released by Reporters Without Borders. The watchdog organisation has labelled the court order on the seizure of the “Azadliq” bank accounts an “illegal decision” in a “decisive phase in moves over the past few months to suffocate” the paper.“ Exorbitant fines and a deliberate attempt to squeeze its circulation have put the newspaper in a precarious position, further exacerbated by its bank account being frozen. The paper’s survival is under greater threat than ever, which is precisely the intention of the courts.” Reporters Without Borders, in the statement published on its website, say the Azerbaijani authorities “must finally decriminalize defamation and guarantee independent journalists and media organizations a fair hearing.”

source: Report prepared by Marion Kipiani for commonspace.eu

photo: Representatives of Azadliq newspaper making an appeal for support to stop the newspaper from closing down (picture courtesy of www.azadliq.az.)

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)