Analysis: Tensions between Greece and Türkiye in the Aegean have deep historical roots

The European Union has some difficult decisions ahead as tensions between EU member state Greece, and EU Candidate country Türkiye, in the Aegean Sea, escalate. This dispute is not only about economic and maritime resources, but also has deep historical roots. Noman Ahmed and Maximiliaan van Lange analyse the background to the current stand-off.

Recently, the Turkish Government's research vessel "Oruç Reis" began exploratory surveying south of the Greek Island of Kastellorizo. The drilling led to a dangerous confrontation between the Turkish and Greek navies, as warships sailed through the narrow strait that separates the Island from the Turkish mainland. In a recent incident between a Turkish navy ship and a Greek frigate, the Turkish ship got damaged, and this almost led to a confrontation between the Turkish and Greek navies. 

Since then, the Turks have been on their guard because the Greek coastguard has recently intercepted a Turkish recreational boat. Subsequently, Turkish recreational boats have stayed away from Kastellorizo. Both countries remain on high alert. On the diplomatic front, Greece and Türkiye accused each other of escalation and NATO-sponsored talks to defuse the tensions appear stalled. The location of Kastellorizo can tell us much about the dispute, and why the strait is the site for the developing tensions. And it is not only about oil and gas. 

Kastellorizo's isolated location, two kilometres from the Turkish mainland and 580 kilometres from the Greek mainland, gives the island a vital role in the geopolitical balance of power. Kastellorizo is the latest fault line of the long-running geopolitical conflict between Türkiye and Greece, currently centred around the exploitation of gas fields in the eastern Mediterranean. For Türkiye, access to energy resources is an essential objective of its ambitious foreign policy. Egypt, Israel, the Republic of Cyprus and Greece are other regional players who plan to extract gas and compete for European markets via pipelines that run across the same geographical region.

Economic and maritime resources are not the only considerations in Turkish and Greek minds. Both countries have long aimed at limiting each other's geopolitical advancement. Historical claims, national pride, and a long list of perceived unresolved grievances have long weighed down on the relationship between the two neighbours. 

In the 18th century, several tensions emerged on the periphery of the Ottoman Empire, leading, among other things, to the Greek War of Independence in the early 19th century. Tensions were exacerbated due to the support of the newly independent Greek state for Russia, and for other parts of the Ottoman Empire that wanted to secede. Tensions continued until the last days of the Empire. When the Greek-Turkish War ended in 1922, the new-born state of Türkiye had to hastily accept the Treaty of Lausanne which drew the modern borders between Greece and Türkiye. Kastellorizo, despite being closer to Turkish shores, became part of Greece. Needless to say, the Turks were not entirely happy about the treaty but in light of the challenges facing their new state, they accepted the maritime borders, and other provisions stipulated by the Treaty in return for international recognition, but with lingering grudges and reservations.

The discovery of oil and gas reserves in the East Mediterranean in the past decade has raised the stakes and ignited a new wave of tensions. However at the heart of the current dispute are also core issues of national pride and security, maritime borders, and for Türkiye, the feeling of loss that the current Turkish government appears determined to rectify.

The Treaty of Lausanne is not the only legal regime that impacts the present crisis. International law clearly defines maritime borders and Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ). Since the Eastern Mediterranean is a compact area with almost ten littoral countries, maritime borders can be subject to multiple interpretations. The Greek interpretation boxes Türkiye in and hinders its ambitions to become a regional energy hub. To break the containment, Türkiye claims its own version of maritime borders, as in the agreement it reached with the Libyan Government in Tripoli in December 2019. Furthermore, it has been reinforcing those claims by sending research ships to conduct exploration, accompanied by naval vessels.

Signing cooperation deals is another method of laying claim to the EEZs. The EEZ claimed by the EastMed Gas Forum (Egypt, the Republic of Cyprus, Israel, and Greece) essentially contradicts the EEZ claimed in the Memorandum of Understanding between Libya and Türkiye, with the latter ignoring the presence of small Greek islands including Kastellorizo. Türkiye, in fact, does not recognize the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea which had created the concept of EEZs. Turkish action threatens the EastMed project and thus, gas is not expected to reach Europe anytime soon and the EU will have to keep using Russian gas until the dispute in the East Mediterranean is resolved. 

The situation in the eastern Mediterranean risks breaking into a regional conflict in which global powers such as Russia and NATO can be embroiled. France sent warships to the disputed waters around Kastellorizo last week in a show of support for Greece. Egypt and Israel are also supporting Greece in the conflict, but the United States does not want war in the area and will not encourage either side into conflict. The US has recently completed joint naval exercises with Türkiye, and views it as a key regional ally despite outstanding issues in US-Türkiye relations. Russia is also facing something of a quandary. Greece and Cyprus have traditionally shared a Christian Orthodox heritage tradition, and have a long history of good relations. But Russia has also in the last years been courting Türkiye which it sees as an important ally against US-EU pressure.

A political solution seems a long way off, considering that tensions remain very high. Greece and Türkiye are making maximalist demands, and are under significant pressure from their domestic audiences in their own countries not to budge. A solution is only possible if all the countries in the region are willing to gather around a table and prepare to offer a concession. Alas, talks are complicated by the fact that Türkiye has poor relations with many of those countries, and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is on a mission to assert Turkish power in the eastern Mediterranean, under the banner of national dignity and restoration of lost rights. 

Source: Noman Ahmed is a Research Associate on Europe's Neighbourhood South at LINKS Europe; Maximiliaan van Lange is a Research Associate on Safety, Security and Transparency in the EU and beyond at LINKS Europe.
Photo:
The Turkish research vessel "Oruc Reis", escorted by Turkish navy ships, conducts exploration in disputed Aegean waters (archive picture)
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Council of Europe launches new International Claims Commission for Ukraine

Council of Europe launches new International Claims Commission for Ukraine

Thirty-four countries and the European Union have signed a new convention establishing an International Claims Commission for Ukraine at a diplomatic conference co-hosted by the 46-nation Council of Europe and the Netherlands in the Hague. The diplomatic conference was attended by leaders and high-level representatives from over 50 states, including the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of the Republic of Moldova, Maia Sandu, and the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Dick Schoof.  “Today marks a major step forward in ensuring accountability for Ukraine. The International Claims Commission represents justice and hope for tens of thousands of victims—our determination that those who have suffered will not be forgotten. I call for quick ratifications so we can get the commission rapidly up and running for the people of Ukraine,” said Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said: “We expect that every mechanism for compensation from the Register of Damage and Claims Commission to the actual payments – will start working and receive strong and sufficient international support, so that people can truly feel that any kind of damage caused by the war can be compensated. This war, and Russia’s responsibility for it, MUST become a clear example – so that others learn not to choose aggression.” “Accountability is about creating the conditions for peace that endures. And therefore, accountability is a condition of security – today and for the future. But accountability is not only about Ukraine. And it is not only about one aggressor and one victim. Accountability is about Europe. About every country in Europe. It is about whether Europe, as a whole, is willing to defend its peace,” said Maia Sandu, President of the Republic of Moldova, which currently holds the Presidency of the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers. The Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Dick Schoof, said: “Every day Russia is deliberately bombarding homes, destroying businesses and damaging infrastructure in Ukraine. Russia must compensate Ukraine for the damage caused. That is why we have launched the International Claims Commission for Ukraine and we are honoured to host it.” The International Claims Commission will be the second part of a comprehensive compensation mechanism related to Russia’s war of aggression, building on the existing Register of Damage for Ukraine. The claims commission will be established within the framework of the Council of Europe and will also be open to other countries. The Register of Damage for Ukraine, created in 2023, collects and records compensation claims submitted by individuals, organisations and public bodies in Ukraine. Forty-four states and the European Union have so far joined the Register, which has already received 86,000 claims. The International Claims Commission will review, assess and decide upon claims submitted to the Register of Damage for Ukraine and determine the amount of compensation, if any, which is due in each case. The convention establishing the commission will enter into force once it has been ratified by 25 signatories, as long as sufficient funds have been secured to support its initial work.

Popular