Analysis: New Crisis Group report says Armenia and Azerbaijan need to dig themselves out of Karabakh conflict

The International Crisis Group has just published a new report on the situation around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in which they say that "in the absence of talks, the gulf separating the two sides and societies on each issue is likely to widen. Getting back to the table will be difficult but is the only way Armenia and Azerbaijan can start digging out of their deadlock."

The report adds:

"Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders should capitalise on steps taken since the flare-up of violence on the frontlines in April 2016 to initiate direct talks on the issues underpinning their standoff. A narrow window to do so risks closing.

Disagreement over the fate of these territories adjacent to Nagorno-Karabakh, security provisions for populations living in the conflict zone, and Nagorno-Karabakh's status have always been discussed as a single package. This has blocked progress.

➤ On adjacent territories, both sides should discuss settlements built since the 1992-1994 war. A temporary freeze on settlement expansion in exchange for Azerbaijan's pledge not to pursue legal action or impose new sanctions could create space for talks.

➤ On security arrangements, the parties could empower the OSCE to reinvigorate the High-Level Planning Group to reassess peacekeeping options. Russia's offers to deploy troops have consistently been rebuffed by Armenia, Azerbaijan or both.

➤ On Nagorno-Karabakh's status, the parties remain far apart but semi-formal or informal talks could still be worthwhile and avoid the risk of greater acrimony that may result from the publicity of formal talks.

 The report concludes:

"Direct talks between the parties inevitably entail risks. They could highlight the distance between the two sides' positions, thereby fuelling mutual anger and potentially reversing the past months' gains. But years of continued stalemate have put a potential solution further out of reach and isolated Armenians and Azerbaijanis from one another. The more time goes by, the more facts on the ground will be entrenched, the harder they will be to reverse and the graver the risk of war. If talks might make matters worse, their continued absence almost certainly will. Getting back to the table will be difficult but is the only way Armenia and Azerbaijan can start digging out of their deadlock."

You can read the report in full on the International Crisis Group website here

source: commonspace.eu with International Crisis Group

photo 1: Crisis Group's expert Zaur Shiriyev (seated) meets with Azerbaijani IDPs living close to the Line of Contact. Photo courtesy of International Crisis Group)

photo 2: An Armenian villager shows Crisis Group's expert Olesya Vartanyan the positions of the Armenian and Azerbaijani militaries. (photo courtesy of the International Crisis Group).

The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of commonspace.eu or its partners.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Dozens participate in new Armenia-Azerbaijan dialogue process as societies prepare for the signing of historic peace agreement

Dozens participate in new Armenia-Azerbaijan dialogue process as societies prepare for the signing of historic peace agreement

The governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan have recently agreed the text of a historic peace agreement that ends years of animosity and warfare. The agreement is expected to be signed soon. LINKS Europe, which has a long history of engagement with the process of peace in the region, recently launched a new Armenia-Azerbaijan dialogue format in the framework of the European Union's EU4Peace initiative. In the last two weeks dozens of Armenians and Azerbaijanis, including academics, students, civil society activists, journalists and other professionals, many of them young, were involved. The work is organised in five thematic groups focusing on peace and security, connectivity, environment, governance and gender and equality and in phase 2 of the project, which has just ended, around fifty participants took part in in-person and online meetings, and more than twenty others were involved indirectly. The Chairpersons of the five thematic groups met in Vilnius, 3-6 July to launch the third phase of the program. The five thematic groups are now working on separate reports, which are expected to be finished in November and presented to the two governments and other stakeholders. The reports will outline a vision, up to 2040.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Dozens participate in new Armenia-Azerbaijan dialogue process as societies prepare for the signing of historic peace agreement

Dozens participate in new Armenia-Azerbaijan dialogue process as societies prepare for the signing of historic peace agreement

The governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan have recently agreed the text of a historic peace agreement that ends years of animosity and warfare. The agreement is expected to be signed soon. LINKS Europe, which has a long history of engagement with the process of peace in the region, recently launched a new Armenia-Azerbaijan dialogue format in the framework of the European Union's EU4Peace initiative. In the last two weeks dozens of Armenians and Azerbaijanis, including academics, students, civil society activists, journalists and other professionals, many of them young, were involved. The work is organised in five thematic groups focusing on peace and security, connectivity, environment, governance and gender and equality and in phase 2 of the project, which has just ended, around fifty participants took part in in-person and online meetings, and more than twenty others were involved indirectly. The Chairpersons of the five thematic groups met in Vilnius, 3-6 July to launch the third phase of the program. The five thematic groups are now working on separate reports, which are expected to be finished in November and presented to the two governments and other stakeholders. The reports will outline a vision, up to 2040.