Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
Thank you. But No thank you! Armenian Foreign Minister Nalbandian tells European institutions they have no mandate to discuss the Karabakh conflict.

Thank you. But No thank you! Armenian Foreign Minister Nalbandian tells European institutions they have no mandate to discuss the Karabakh conflict.

1 June 2013

Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian has snubbed attempts by European structures to get involved in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement process and has reminded them that they have no mandate to do so.

The Armenian news portal news.am reported that speaking at the meeting of the Standing Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe being held in Yerevan, Nalbandian thanked the European institutions for their interest and assistance to the settlement of the Karabakh conflict but reminded his guests that the conflict has not been formally discussed in the Council or Europe, or in the Committee of Ministers."These structures have no mandate, but we are grateful for their interest and the interest of other international organizations to the OSCE Minsk Group activities aimed at finding a peaceful settlement on the basis of the proposals made by co-chairs and other member states of the organization. This format is very important and effective," he said.

Edward Nalbandian recalled that a number of declarations on the level of the co-chairs of the Minsk Group and OSCE Ministerial Council were adopted on Karabakh: "There is no other conflict in the world which would be raised to such a high political level." Minister Nalbandian reiterated that Armenia welcomes and supports the mentioned statements and is ready to participate in the settlement of the conflict based on these statements. Foreign Minister said that the Armenian side has never demanded that the international community must support their positions exclusively.

"We expect the support of the international community which is expressed in statements. Such a support can help in finding a peaceful settlement. A similar approach Armenia expects from Azerbaijan," he said.

Asked about the extent of compromise, Minister Nalbandian said that Yerevan's position is fully consonant with the position of the international community. The Minister stressed Armenia's readiness for confidence-building measures."Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh are committed to maintaining the ceasefire, creation of mechanisms to investigate incidents, and withdrawal of snipers. Azerbaijan rejects all such approaches," news.am quotes the Minister as saying.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment:

"For a long time Armenia has indicated that it is comfortable with the format of the OSCE Minsk Process as the mechanism for resolving the Karabakh conflict. Over the last few months however Armenian politicians and diplomats seems to be taking the issue one step further, insisting that discussions of the Karabakh conflict can only take place in the format of the OSCE Minsk Process. It has for example refused to participate in the meetings of an ad-hoc committee of PACE that was established to look at the issue. This new Armenian approach is not sustainable, and may even be counter productive. It increases perceptiuon that the Minsk process is biased towards Armenia, and perhaps even worse, given that the process has not yielded any results in the twenty years that it has been established, it increases the perceptiion that Armenia is happy with a process that is stalled.

Some observers of the negotiations attribute some blame to the diplomats of the three OSCE Minsk Group co-chair countries, since they have allowed a situation whereby both sides now give diametrically opposed versions of why the negotiations are stalled. The Minsk Group silence and secrecy is therefore now adding to an already complex and difficult situation."

 

source: commonspace.eu with news.am

photo: Foreign Minister Nalbandian addressing the PACE Standing Committee in Yerevan on 31 May 2013 (picture courtesy of the Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland
Trending

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

6 January 2026
 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."
Trending

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

5 January 2026
Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland
Trending

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

6 January 2026
 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.