Russia continues to pile pressure on Armenia, and after Bishkek, it is now also using its Iranian proxy

 

Russia continues to pile pressure on Armenia. It realises it is loosing the grip that it has had on the country ever since its independence in 1991. Now, Russia is also using its influence on Iran, a country that borders Armenia, to add pressure on the government of Nikol Pashinyan.

According to some Armenian media outlets Iran has demanded that security for the TRIPP project in Armenia be ensured exclusively by the Armenian Armed Forces or the armed forces of a third country already present on Armenian territory. The only such third country at the moment is Russia.

Iranian authorities fear that American forces can be deployed to protect the TRIPP route and this could result in the encirclement of Iran. Yet the deployment of US troops has never been under consideration.

The Armenian authorities have assured that the implementation of the TRIPP project will not create any challenges or threats for Iran.

This latest development follows a tense meeting between Russian president Vladimir Putin and Armenia prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan in Bishkek. The Russian president was transmiting "hot and cold" in Bishkek. With Pashinyan, the atmosphere was certainly cold.

Turkish journalist, Ilker Sezer, Managing Editor of Turkiye Today, wrote on Saturday (5 September)

Russian President Vladimir Putin was not always highly diplomatic, or Siberian-cold, in Bishkek this week. Sitting across from Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, the Russian president delivered a tense ultimatum masked as administrative advice. They had an unusual back-and-forth conversation, and it wasn't a PR video showing Putin as a strongman involving other countries’ internal affairs. 

He stated that Yerevan needs to make up its mind about its European Union membership aspirations "sooner" rather than later, adding that Moscow desperately needs "clarity" on how to proceed with the relationship. It was a reminder of the zero-sum game the Kremlin insists on playing in its immediate neighborhood.  

Yet, the same day, Putin stood next to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and the geopolitical temperature inexplicably dropped to a tepid room setting. There is no need to highlight that Türkiye is a NATO member—a defense alliance Western media claim Russia could attack by the late 2020s (and damn, we entered the late 2020s on Sept. 1, 2026)—or that its EU candidacy status endures, albeit purely on paper. 

The resulting press statement from the two leaders was a staggering display of diplomatic theater. The world is practically burning, and yet, listening to the official readouts, one might assume these two men had gathered in the Central Asian steppes solely to review the booming volume of Russian tourists visiting Antalya and to track milestones at the Akkuyu nuclear power plant. Press readouts are always dry, anyway. 

They presented a heavily curated vision of Antalya's sunny beaches and energy cooperation. But this Pollyannaish attempt to steer the narrative strictly toward shared mutual interests convinces no one. Behind closed doors, the actual agenda may have been undeniably heavy with structural, existential issues that neither leader felt comfortable airing in front of the cameras.

Back in Moscow, Russian politicians close to Putin, continue with daily tirades against Armenia, and its attempts to escape Moscow's grip.

The European Commission's evasive stance on the timing of establishing a visa-free regime with Armenia is not unexpected: Brussels traditionally demands maximum concessions from candidates, but limits itself to assurances of "brilliant prospects," Konstantin Kosachev, Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council of the Russian Federation, told the TASS news agency.

"There is certainly nothing unexpected in this position. The European Union's practice is well known: to demand maximum loyalty and concessions from its candidates for membership, in return for which it rewards them with non-binding assurances of "brilliant prospects." So, in this situation, the only unexpected thing is the unfounded confidence of the current Armenian leadership in such assurances.

And if that is not confidence, then it is an unprincipled calculation that it will be possible to play on the contradictions of other power centers competing for Armenia, besides the European Union. It will not work,” Kosachev added.

This politicial pressure comes on top of a series of economic measures that Moscow has ordered that try to stifle the Armenian economy. But Pashinyan and his government remain defiant. The governent plan for 2026-31 speaks about a balanced foreign policy. Russia's primary role in Armenia is over.

source: This analysis was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
European Commission Disburses €1.24 Billion to Boost Ukraine’s Defence Industry

European Commission Disburses €1.24 Billion to Boost Ukraine’s Defence Industry

The European Commission disbursed €1.24 billion to Ukraine on Wednesday (October 7) under the defence component of the €90 billion Ukraine Support Loan, earmarked for drones, drone interceptors, ammunition, and missiles produced by Ukrainian entities. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the payment would strengthen Ukraine’s defence industry and its ability to protect people and infrastructure. She described Russia’s ongoing attacks as a deliberate strategy intended to make daily life increasingly difficult for Ukrainians. The Ukraine Support Loan provides an indicative €60 billion for defence and €30 billion for budgetary assistance during 2026–2027. The European Commission plans to disburse €28.3 billion for Ukraine’s defence industrial capacity in 2026, with further payments under the defence component expected in the coming weeks. Funding decisions are based on Ukraine’s evolving requirements and remain subject to agreed conditions and monitoring. According to Ukrainian Prime Minister Serhiy Koretskyi, the latest payment brings Ukraine’s defence financing received through the programme to nearly €13 billion. He said the government would continue working with European partners to ensure the remaining planned funding is delivered on schedule and in full For the remainder of 2026, €32.5 billion in EU financial support remains available to Ukraine. This includes €28.1 billion under the Ukraine Support Loan – €15.4 billion for defence industrial capacity and €12.7 billion in budget support. A further €4.4 billion remains available through the Ukraine Facility, bringing the total budget support available for 2026 to more than €17 billion, subject to Ukraine meeting the relevant conditions. Since 2022, the EU and its member states have provided €228.7 billion in overall support to Ukraine, including €3.8 billion generated from immobilised Russian assets.
Editor's choice
News
In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

Government forces in Ethiopia, have taken control of the town of Mekelle, capital of the Tigray region. Earlier, Ethiopia's federal military said it had recaptured the main airport in the capital of the northern Tigray region, dealing a major setback to an ​opposition alliance in its stronghold. Clashes pitting a rebel alliance led by Tigray's ruling party ‌against the government and its allied forces broke out in northern Ethiopia last week, in the most serious escalation of violence since a 2020-2022 civil war. The fighting has stoked fears that it could escalate into a wider regional conflict, potentially drawing in neighbouring ​countries in the Horn of Africa and the Gulf. In recent days Ethiopia and Eritrea broke off diplomatic relations amid mutual accusations. In Washington, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott ​said the United States strongly urged Ethiopia and Eritrea to "exercise maximum restraint and return ⁠to dialogue and cooperation as agreed in their 2018 peace framework." "The Horn of Africa cannot sustain another ​military conflict and humanitarian crisis," Pigott said. "A conflict jeopardizes ongoing U.S. collaboration on shared interests with both countries." The ​federal government in Addis Ababa accused Eritrea of supporting the rebel alliance alongside Sudan and Egypt. The three countries deny this. Troops from the Ethiopian National Defence Forces had regained control of Alula Aba ​Nega Airport in Tigray's capital Mekelle,   A Mekelle resident who asked not to be named for security reasons, confirmed the ‌taking of ⁠the airport by government forces and added they could hear gunfire outside the city centre. This source said they had seen some Tigrayan Defence Force fighters abandoning their posts and heading home, and that there was looting of government facilities taking place in the city. Mekelle's airport, which ​is around 10 km (6 miles) from the centre of the city, was ​one of three ⁠airports in the region that were seized by the opposition forces at the start of the fighting on September 23. The taking of Mekelle by government forces would be a major setback for the opposition alliance, although analysts say ⁠it ​would be unlikely to end the conflict. In 2020, federal forces captured ​Mekelle within the first month of the two year war before the TPLF reclaimed it seven months later.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)