Updated: Kazakhstan approves important constitutional changes

Updated, Monday 16 March 2026

Kazakh voters in a referendum on Sunday approved a new constitution, exit polls showed. Two exit polls said around 87% of voters had backed the new constitution. Turnout stood at 73%, the electoral commission earlier said. The new constitution streamlines the country's parliament, and recreates the office of vice president, which was abolished in 1996.

-------

Voting is taking place on Sunday (15 March)  in Kazakhstan in a nationwide referendum on a new draft Constitution.

According to the Central Referendum Commission of Kazakhstan, 12,046,617 citizens are eligible to participate in the referendum.

359 international observers and 206 foreign journalists were accredited to monitor the referendum in order to ensure the transparency of the voting process.

International organizations monitoring the referendum include the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the CIS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Organization of Turkic States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.

The Central Referendum Commission must announce the final results of the vote within seven days after the referendum.

A total of 10,401 polling stations are operating inside and outside the country to organize voting. 71 of them were opened at diplomatic missions in 54 countries. If citizens support the proposed changes, the new Constitution will enter into force on July 1, 2026. After that, elections for a new parliament are planned in the country, and these elections are expected to be organized by the end of August.

The position of vice president will be implemented after the formation of the new parliament.

The referendum is the fifth in the history of independent Kazakhstan and may lead to the adoption of a new fundamental law that will determine the direction of the country's political and legal development in the coming years.

The Referendum is being held at the initiative of the President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and envisages the implementation of large-scale constitutional reforms in the country. According to the submitted draft, approximately 84 percent of the text of the Constitution has been updated and new articles and sections have been developed. The question on the ballot paper asks, "Do you accept the new Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan?" Voters express their position by answering "for" or "against" this question.

Currently, the Constitution adopted on August 30, 1995, is in force in Kazakhstan. Since its adoption, the document has been repeatedly amended and supplemented. The latest amendments entered into force in September 2022. However, the scale of the proposed reforms necessitated the preparation of a new Constitutional document. Thus, the amendments cover approximately 84 percent of the text of the existing basic law.

The draft of the new Constitution was presented to the public in early February 2026. After the document was published, the country's citizens were given more than a month to familiarize themselves with it and discuss the proposed changes.

The President of Kazakhstan said that the adoption of a new Constitution is the need of the hour. According to him, the country has reached a stage of maturity and responsibility when important decisions that determine the future of the state should be made.

According to Elvira Azimova, the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court of Kazakhstan, the new Constitution will be a confirmation of the country's statehood maturity and international obligations.

Tokayav’s initiative

The idea of ​​constitutional reform was first voiced during the annual address to the people of Kazakhstan by the President Tokayev on September 8, 2025. At that time, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev proposed changing the current parliamentary model from a bicameral system to a unicameral one.

On January 20, 2026, at a meeting of the National Congress, which performs advisory functions to the government, he presented additional proposals for reforming the political system. These proposals included the creation of the position of vice president, the reorganization of advisory institutions, and the updating of the preamble to the Constitution.

On January 21, 2026, the president signed a decree on the establishment of the Constitutional Commission. The commission included representatives of state bodies, experts, scientists and public figures. Initially, it was planned to make amendments to the existing Constitution. However, during the discussions, it became clear that the amendments covered more than 80 percent of the text of the document, and as a result, a decision was made to prepare a new basic law.

On February 11, 2026, the Chairperson of the Constitutional Court, Elvira Azimova, who heads the Constitutional Commission, presented the final version of the new draft Constitution to the President. On the same day, president Tokayev signed a decree on the republican referendum set  for March 15, 2026.

On February 12, the text of the draft Constitution was published in national media, allowing for the start of public debate.

New preamble and values

The new draft Constitution begins with a revised preamble. This section reflects the historical and cultural foundations of the state. The document refers to the history of the Great Steppe, emphasizes the idea of ​​a just Kazakhstan, and enshrines the principle of the rule of law.

The text also affirms the unitary nature of the state, the inviolability of state borders, and the territorial integrity of the country.

The document also pays special attention to issues such as strengthening interethnic and interfaith solidarity, developing science and education, protecting the environment, and maintaining ecological balance.

Economic and legal provisions

One of the innovations is the definition of the country's national currency at the Constitutional level. For the first time, the text of the Basic Law clearly states that the currency of the Republic of Kazakhstan is the tenge.

The document confirms that the presidential form of government will be preserved. At the same time, according to the draft, national legislation will be considered a priority, and the procedure for implementing international treaties will be determined by separate laws.

Political system and parties

The new version of the Constitution expands certain restrictions on political parties and trade unions. The ban on funding these organizations by foreign states and international structures remains in force.

In addition, financial support to political parties by foreign citizens, stateless persons, and companies with foreign capital is prohibited.

Language and religion policy

The draft constitution establishes the principle of separation of religion and state. The country's education system maintains its secular character, with the exception of religious educational institutions.

The state language of Kazakhstan remains Kazakh. However, Russian will be officially used alongside Kazakh in state and local government bodies.

The state also undertakes to create conditions for the development of the languages ​​of all peoples living in Kazakhstan and to ensure the inadmissibility of discrimination on the basis of language and other grounds.

Powers of the President

According to the draft constitution, the presidential term remains seven years. The same person can only hold the position of head of state once.

Also, the ban on appointing close relatives of the president to high state positions remains in force.

The document also includes a new norm, according to which the president can voluntarily resign by applying to the Constitutional Court.

In addition, it is also possible for the head of state to be dismissed from office if he is unable to continuously fulfill his duties due to his health condition.

Parliamentary reform

One of the main changes is the transition of the parliament to a unicameral system. It is proposed to create a single legislative body called the Kurultay, instead of the existing Senate and Mejlis.

The parliament will consist of 145 deputies, who will be elected on party lists for a five-year term.

The new model is expected to increase the efficiency of legislative activities and speed up decision-making.

Creation of the position of Vice President

The draft constitution envisages the creation of a new state position, the post of vice president.

The candidate for this position will be nominated by the president and appointed with the approval of parliament. The vice president will be the second person in the state power system and will perform the duties of the head of state in the event of the president's premature termination of his powers.

He/She will also interact with parliament and perform other functions as determined by the president.

Establishment of the People's Council

The document also envisages the creation of a supreme consultative body called the People's Council of Kazakhstan.

This body will combine the functions of the Assembly of the Peoples of Kazakhstan and the National Congress. The People's Council will develop recommendations on domestic policy, strengthening public consensus, and strengthening national unity.

In addition, this body will be able to initiate legislation and propose holding referendums.

Government and Prime Minister

According to the draft constitution, the president will nominate a candidate for the post of prime minister. Once appointed, the prime minister will head the executive branch.

The government will be accountable to parliament and will hand over its powers to the new parliament after the next parliamentary elections.

Procedure for amending the Constitution

One of the main innovations is the change in the procedure for making amendments to the Constitution.

According to the draft, any changes to the Constitution can only be adopted through a nationwide referendum.

The changes will be considered adopted if they are supported by the majority of citizens who participated in the vote and a positive result is achieved in at least two-thirds of the country's regions.

Citizenship and security

The draft constitution also includes provisions on citizenship. The document reaffirms the ban on dual citizenship.

Acquisition of citizenship of another country may be grounds for deprivation of Kazakh citizenship. These grounds also include terrorist activities or actions that seriously harm the national interests of the state.

How is voting conducted?

In the referendum, citizens are presented with only one question - whether they support the adoption of the new Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Voters must choose one of two options: support the project or oppose it.

If a voter marks both boxes at the same time, the ballot will be considered valid, but will not be taken into account when counting the votes. Ballots with no markings or where the voter's will cannot be determined are considered invalid.

A referendum is considered valid if more than half of the citizens included in the voter lists participate in the vote.

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

picture: Voting taking place in Kazakhstan in a referendum on 15 March 2026.

 

 

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)