Nicholas Maltby talked to Azerbaijani born artist Ulvi Pepinova about her work, her life and her vision on relations between Armenians and Azerbaijanis.

Azerbaijani born artist Ulvi Pepinova creates glass paintings inspired by natural minerals and images of earth taken from space. She is also a board member at Vatan (International Society of the Meskhetian Turks), External Communications Officer of Conservative Friends of Turkey and has just launched the Chelsea Young Writers Club for children. On the eve of the opening of an exhibition of her work in London Nicholas Maltby talked to her about her work, her life and her vision on relations between Armenians and Azerbaijanis. Pepinova speaks about the importance of tolerance and pragmatism. Ulvi Pepinova ends with a quote by Nelson Mandela, which she says is an appropriate message for Armenians and Azerbaijanis alike.

Glass is a strange choice of material to work with; why did you choose it?

I like the texture of painted glass; its transparency, its brightness and its glossiness. I just love it: glass has its own sensual qualities of smoothness, silk and gloss, which create a stunning effect.

What is the technique you use to paint on glass? Please talk us through it in detail - presumably, for example, you blow the glass before you begin the painting?

I am not a glass blower, I only paint on glass. I originally only adopted traditional glass painting techniques, solely using glass paints. However, my passion was for natural minerals, rock patterns and minute intricate structures that echo my admiration for images of the earth taken from the air and space. This stimulated my imagination with regard to the materials at my disposal.

In addition to glass paints, I enjoy experimenting with various recently-developed decorative base materials, such as pitches, resins, textured paints, liquid stone, marble, granite and glass granules. I also use flexible stone comprising a unique extraction of natural stone patterns suspended in a smooth paste, with a viscosity akin to paint. I sometimes feel that I am in a chemistry laboratory where I am testing new reactions and awaiting the outcome. In my last series of Buta, alongside glass paints I used small stone crystals and glass textured beads. Glass is resistant to certain chemical compositions; however, it can also be flexible and malleable, giving successful results, in most cases. In my opinion, glass is a considerably more accommodating material than is generally acknowledged.

What inspired the technique? What kind of precedents are there?

My own imagination! My love for colours, my love for minerals and the beauty of their patterns; and my love for images of earth from space.

What experience do you have of other artistic techniques and why do you find glasswork is your niche?

Glass is the first medium I have worked with that is truly unusual. Generally it serves as the canvas on which the first sketches are made by artists; but in my case the process works the other way round. In my upcoming show, I will be exhibiting two paintings on canvas, where the aim was to reach the same glossy effect as you find on glass.

You illustrated the book the May Winds Whisper? What was the genesis and purpose of that project?

The author is a keen admirer of my artwork and she felt my paintings would be a good companion to her writing.

There is a long tradition of art inspiring poetry and vice versa - who are your icons?

I was nurtured with a Muscovite spirit during my formative years: I have inherited love for the Russian poetry. But I don't have icons. Whilst the list can be long when referring to ‘Silver Age' poets - beloved by so many of us - my occasional reading of Pushkin to my daughter has re-affirmed my belief that he was a true master - a father of Russian rhyme. I also follow contemporary poets such as Dimitry Bykov and Vera Polozkova; both are incredibly rich in thought and word. When I'm feeling nostalgic for eastern wisdom, I tend to glance through Fuzuli and Rumi's ghazals.

I do believe that art inspires poetry and vice versa. For example, I owe the title of one of my paintings, ‘Rainbow of Fire', to the Irish poet, Alan Patrick Traynor, who dedicated a beautifully written poem to the painting.

You use images of the earth from space to inform your glasswork - is that a comment on the fragility of earthly experience?

I didn't have any underlying message in reflecting the images of the earth from space at the outset in my experiments with glass painting - I was just captivated by the mesmerizing images, and somehow I wished to share my passion for them. Yet, the more you look at them, the more you plunge into grand thoughts about the pettiness we witness in our daily lives and which entices us into fighting mode, rather than into a peaceful co-existence.

How long have you been painting for? Did you study art as part of a degree?

I started painting in 2008. I have no degree in any arts subject. My previous degrees are in Business Management and European Public Policy. I never had an ambition or desire to be an artist, I was happy to be an admirer of art. It just so happened that at certain point of your life you suddenly find yourself doing what you never thought you would be involved in. Even now, I am not very accustomed to being called an artist - but there is no other appropriate label, I suppose! I may be wrong in my presumption, but I have a fear that if I sign up for a fine art course I would feel restrained in my explorations. I am very interested in getting more practical experience on working with fused glass though.

You've been educated in Moscow and Turkey - do you find that displacement important to self-development?

Displacement, in my view, is not paramount to self-development per se, but changing scenes certainly has its own effect on your perceptions and it gives you more food for thought. I loved everything about Turkey - from its incredibly rich cuisine to the wisdom and spirit of the Turkish people - something I witnessed in particular during the earthquake of 1999 - it's the way the Turkish build up relationships and cherish family values, friendship - how they are so supportive of one another. My sense was that the Turkish culture is extrovert and introvert at the same time; this makes it more puzzling for outsiders, and thus misperceptions prevail.   It was challenging for me to feel fully integrated - but that is understandable. I have the same sense in the UK!

Why do you live in London now? Do you still feel connected with Azeri art?

I've been living in London over a decade and this is officially my home! London is a distinct love story for me. It was not love at the first sight, I did not have butterflies in my stomach when I first came, but I do have them now every time I go back to London and realise how much I miss my lover. Having a strong bond with Azerbaijan, Turkey and Russia, it was in Britain where I discovered the full meaning of free-thinking, creativity and fearlessness in persevering whatever is meaningful or sacred to you. To me, London is a homeland of innovative ideas, creative ideas and of lots of rain!

You've written a piece on Nagorno-Karabakh that is quite critical of the EU's intervention within the region; what kind of future role does the EU have in the region? Do politics and art mix?

Politics and art mix only if an artist has a deliberate intention to deliver a particular message in a political context, or, when politicians want to see a political message in the art. This is not the case with my art, I don't think.

In general terms, within the region the EU is not regarded as a serious broker with a fat belly, but I would argue that the EU is a heavyweight darling - cautiously, scrupulously and gently making steps following its long-term vision. The EU is a credible peacemaker and its peacemaking role was re-affirmed by the Nobel Peace Prize last year. As a pan-European, and as a well-wisher for Azerbaijan and Armenia, I would like to see more daring steps in the EU's involvement with Nagorno-Karabakh however.

The desperate attempts by weak (or almost non-existent) civil societies to look for the right recipe in establishing face-to-face contact is always complicated by the geopolitical game, and hardline agendas. However, such attempts should not be buried. My belief is that there are two missing ingredients in attempts to construct a dialogue between the two sides and what the EU can explore more bravely - namely pragmatism and tolerance. We need to be taught and coached at a societal level what these two concepts actually mean. To me, being pragmatic and tolerant does not mean I need to drastically change my core position.

We should see more of the EU's resources allocated to tolerance and educational programmes, workshops, and seminars. This needs to be carried out in a more consistent way, rather than merely as one-off projects. There are two suffering segments in Azerbaijani and Armenian societies: a generation who went or lived through the war years (which has an internal pain), who need psychological work done by professionals to help them overcome this pain, and a younger generation which does not have that internal pain, but carries an artificially imposed hatred. I would like to see more educational programmes on tolerance online, for example.

We should look for ways to work with each other and peacefully co-exist with each other. We should resist an imposed doctrine of ethnic hatred and make efforts in being as pragmatic and tolerant as possible and having a genuine dialogue, which eventually may disentangle the Gordian knot.

Hating each other is self-destructive. Cultivating hatred does not bring joy to our lives - although it may bring a desirable effect and outcome in the geopolitical game. I take a leaf out of Nelson Mandela's book in my advice to all Armenians and Azerbaijanis: ‘If you want to make peace with your enemy, you have to work with your enemy. Then he becomes your partner.'

An exhbition of the work of Ulvi Pepinova opens at the Hollywood Arms in London on Thursday, 23 May. This interview was first published on www.links-dar.org

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)