Sanchez in Rabat for talks with Moroccan King on future of Western Sahara

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez met on Thursday (7 April), with Moroccan King Mohammed VI, as the two countries seek to resolve a diplomatic dispute that broke out last year.

Last month, Madrid undertook a historic diplomatic shift by supporting the autonomy plan for Western Sahara proposed by Rabat. The autonomy plan was considered by Spain as the most "serious, realistic and credible" basis for a peaceful solution to the disputed territory between Morocco and Algeria, which supports independence for the territory. The decision to support the Moroccan position was badly received by Algiers, leading to the recall of the Algerian ambassador to Spain.

Western Sahara is a former Spanish colony classified as "non-autonomous " by the United Nations, with most of its territory under Moroccan control. Since the 1976 war, Sahrawi independence fighters of the Polisario Front, a movement supported by Algiers have tried to resist Moroccan occupation.

The Cherifian Kingdom, after having welcomed the words of its main commercial partner, officially invited the Spanish Prime Minister this week to build on this momentum to ease their year-long diplomatic tensions.

The crisis between Morocco and Spain was triggered last April when Brahim Ghali, leader of the Polisairo Front and public enemy of the Moroccan kingdom, was allowed to be hospitalised in Spain after testing positive to Covid.

In reaction, Moroccan border police let approximately 10,000 migrants from sub-Saharan Africa pass through on their way the Spanish enclave city of Ceuta, on the North African coast, leading to scenes of chaos

Observers expect Pedro Sanchez's visit to resume maritime connections between the two countries, suspended during the crisis.

In Madrid, it is also hoped that Rabat will give up, or at least not pursue too vocally its claim to the two enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla.

The United States, France, Germany, Israel and other countries in Africa and the Arab world have recently expressed similar positions to the one now being pursued by Spain, which essentially endorses the Moroccan plan for the Sahara.

While the Polisario Front, a movement of fighters seeking independence for the territory and supported by Algiers, wants a referendum on the independence question, Rabat says its 2007 autonomy initiative is the most it can do as a political solution to the conflict.

The United Nations has pressed both parties to negotiate within a spirit of compromise towards a “mutually acceptable solution” and has stopped mentioning the referendum option.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Reuters (London), RFI (Paris) and other media outlets
Picture: Spanish Prime Minister on Thursday renewed his country’s endorsement of Morocco’s autonomy plan during a meeting with the King of Morocco; Twitter: @MoroccoWNews

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)