Spain makes a u-turn in its policy on Western Sahara and Algiers is not amused

The Spanish government, led by socialist prime minister Pedro Sánchez, in a surprise move, on Friday (18 March) declared its support for the Moroccan position on the Western Sahara issuer, breaking a long-standing policy of neutrality. The decision was badly received in Algiers, a long time backer of independence for Western Sahara,  leading to the recall of the Algerian ambassador to Spain the following day.

In a letter sent to the Moroccan leader, King Mohammed VI, Sanchez supported the Moroccan strategy to make Western Sahara - a vast phosphate-rich desert region - an autonomous territory within Morocco, describing the Moroccan autonomy strategy as "the most serious, realistic and credible basis for settling the dispute".

The Moroccan Ministry of Foreign Affairs was quick to welcome the decision. 

Western Sahara is a former Spanish colony classified as "non-autonomous " by the United Nations, with most of its territory under Moroccan control since the 1976 war against the Sahrawi independence fighters of the Polisario Front, a movement supported by Algiers.

Madrid had until now refused to adopt a position on the delicate issue, preferring to support a solution within the framework of the UN, which with its mission Minurso has been trying in vain since the 1991 ceasefire to seal an agreement between the Moroccan kingdom and the Polisario Front.

This diplomatic shift can be explained primarily by a need on the Spanish side to stabilise its conflictual relations with its Moroccan neighbour. From a loosening of anti-terrorist collaboration with Morocco, to the questioning of the enclaves of Ceuta and Mililla, as well as the migratory pressure exerted on Madrid by Rabat, the disputes between the two neighbouring countries are manifold.

In May 2021, Moroccan border police let 10,000 migrants from sub-Saharan Africa pass through, creating chaos in the Spanish enclave city of Ceuta, on the north African coast. This lack of cooperation in the management of migration flows was a consequence of the Spanish government’s decision to allow Brahim Ghali, leader of the Polisario Front and public enemy of the Moroccan kingdom, to be hospitalised in Spain after testing positive to Covid.

The pressure to ensure stability in the south had two main consequences for Spanish domestic and foreign policy. On the domestic front, members of the governing party Podemos, whose electorate almost unanimously supports the separatist struggle of the Polisario Front and which was not informed of the decision taken by the head of government in advance, find this diplomatic reversal difficult to bear. Yolanda Diaz, new leader of Podemos and second vice-president of the government, reaffirmed her commitment to the defence of the Saharawi people following Sanchez’s decision, thus highlighting the Spanish government's divisions on the Western Sahara issue.

The Algerian authorities, historical supporter of the Polisario Front,  denounced what they described as the second betrayal by Spain of the Saharawi people, the first being the unilateral Spanish withdrawal from this territory in 1975. At the time this allowed King Hassan II of Morocco to launch a march of 350,000 Moroccan civilians into the territory, effectively annexing it.

The implications of a crisis with Algiers could be serious for Spain. Last year, Algeria supplied almost half of the gas consumed in Spain. Even if this share has fallen to 25% of imported liquefied gas since the closure of two pipelines linked to Spain, the Algerian energy contribution remains essential for Madrid, especially since the EU is currently actively looking for alternatives to Russian gas following the invasion of Ukraine. 

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Le Monde (Paris), Libération (Paris), Reuters (London) and other media outlets
Picture: Fighters with the Polisario Front, which supports independence for Western Sahara, during a training exercise in the territory in October; Twitter: @danwibg retweeting a New York Times article

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)