Thursday Interview: Satu Koivu

Within a tumultuous peace and security environment in the South Caucasus, the European Union has over time established itself in multiple capacities. A network of financial, diplomatic, and security ties comprise the Union’s larger interests in working together with Armenia and Azerbaijan for the benefit of peace, security and stability in the region. 

The European Union Mission in Armenia (EUMA) fulfils an active part in the EU’s contribution to the normalisation process in the South Caucasus. The monitors patrol the entire length of Armenia’s border with Azerbaijan from six Forward Operating Bases on the Armenian side. The Mission conducts both day and night patrols. Total staff of EUMA is over 200 international and national members who are working in different roles such as monitors and in supporting functions. One important task of the Mission is to build confidence among local border communities. Azerbaijan has repeatedly criticised EUMA, describing it as a “propaganda tool” used against Azerbaijan, and viewing the Mission’s presence on the Armenian side of the border with suspicion.

In this final issue of Thursday Interview ahead of a summer recess, we speak to Ms. Satu Koivu, who has since March of this year served as Head of Mission for the European Union Mission in Armenia. HoM Koivu started her career in the Finnish police force, over time building a distinguished career in policing, crisis management, international peacekeeping, and security sector reform. 

Before taking up her post in Armenia, she served as Senior Police Adviser and Head of Police Component in the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus. She has also held advisory and training roles in EU and UN policing missions and courses, including in Palestine, Rwanda, Kenya, and Finland. At the national level, she has held senior positions in the Finnish police, including as Assistant Police Commissioner and Chief of Human Resources Development at the National Police Board of Finland, where her work focused on capacity building, organisational development, police leadership, and professional standards.

We speak to HoM Koivu about her professional life before taking up her post in Armenia, how EUMA fits into the region’s wider goal of peace and stability, the negative perception of the Mission in Azerbaijan, and what it means to build trust and confidence in a still fragile post-conflict environment.

“We are proud to say that since EUMA’s establishment in 2023, the mission’s presence has contributed to a significant reduction in the number of shooting incidents in border areas. This demonstrates how the presence of an international organisation can help conflict parties refrain from violence. Last spring, in 2025, when shooting incidents increased in certain sections of the border, we introduced night patrols. These patrols enhanced the sense of security among residents of border communities and helped reduce tensions and violent activity. Since May 2025, incidents along the border have largely ceased, and the situation has become considerably calmer.”

Read the full interview below:

Ms. Koivu, your career has taken you from national police work in Finland to international assignments in places such as Cyprus, the Palestinian Territories, Rwanda, and Namibia. What lessons from those very different environments do you find relevant in the South Caucasus today?

As a young girl, when I was thinking about my future field of work, I had many options. However, I decided to join the Finnish Police, although it was not the popular choice, as we did not have many women police officers in service at that time. My decision was based on the fact that I wanted to do work which has meaning, and this has been a guiding principle throughout my career, both domestically and internationally.

Based on my experiences in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping and EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) missions, I have learned a lot. The main lesson has been that serving peace and stability is important, and it makes a difference in people’s everyday lives.

It is true that this type of work is nowadays often challenged in terms of purpose, effectiveness, results, etc. I agree that there is, of course, always room for improvement, but I personally feel that this work is needed now even more than ever. In the current world, with Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI), physical threats, and human rights and the rule of law being challenged, it requires commitment and belief in values to be able to deliver. Also, working in conflict areas always means working in a politically very sensitive environment.

Regardless of these challenges, I feel that in EUMA, our team is committed to our mandate implementation, and the best feedback is when we have managed to stabilise the area of our operation and bring hope for a better future for those people we engage with. It is small steps forward, and it is work with meaning.

How would you describe the European Union Mission in Armenia’s overall purpose? How has the work of the mission evolved? How does it fit into the region’s wider goal of peace and stability?

The European Union Mission in Armenia was established on 20 February 2023 following an official request from the Armenian authorities to deploy a civilian mission along the Armenia–Azerbaijan border. It was preceded by a short-term mission, the EU Monitoring Capacity (EUMCAP), which was deployed on the Armenian side of the border from October to December 2022 in the aftermath of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

EUMA’s primary task is to monitor and report on the situation along the Armenian side of the Armenia–Azerbaijan border to EU Member States. The mission also contributes to human security in conflict-affected areas and, where possible, supports confidence-building efforts between Armenia and Azerbaijan. It is important to emphasise that EUMA is a civilian and unarmed mission. We perform exclusively civilian tasks, and both our vehicles and monitors are clearly identifiable.

Our area of operations covers approximately 1,000 kilometres of the Armenia–Azerbaijan border and is supported by six Forward Operating Bases (FOBs) located in Ijevan, Martuni, Jermuk, Yeghegnadzor, Goris, and Kapan.

We are proud to say that since EUMA’s establishment in 2023, the mission’s presence has contributed to a significant reduction in the number of shooting incidents in border areas. This demonstrates how the presence of an international organisation can help conflict parties refrain from violence. Last spring, in 2025, when shooting incidents increased in certain sections of the border, we introduced night patrols. These patrols enhanced the sense of security among residents of border communities and helped reduce tensions and violent activity. Since May 2025, incidents along the border have largely ceased, and the situation has become considerably calmer.

In addition to monitoring the security situation, we conduct human security patrols, during which we visit villages and towns, meet local residents, listen to their concerns, and report our findings. We are frequently invited to schools and universities to speak about our mission and the European Union. We also maintain a number of cooperation projects with civil society organisations, as well as youth and women’s groups. Building trust between the people of Armenia and the European Union is an important part of our work. Over the past year, the number of cooperation initiatives has increased significantly, and we are encouraged by the growing interest in both the EU and our mission.

It should be mentioned that EUMA is one element of the broader efforts undertaken by the European Union and the international community to support peace, stability, and confidence-building in the South Caucasus.

By the time your current mandate ends in February 2027, what would success concretely look like for you?

An improved security environment in the border regions and a substantial reduction in shooting incidents are among our most important achievements. During our time in Armenia, we have seen that the visible presence of an international organisation can help deter violence and encourage restraint among the parties.

Another key measure of success is the trust we have built with local communities. We have witnessed a strong willingness among residents to cooperate with us, share their concerns, and discuss their hopes and plans for the future. The trust of local people is one of our most valuable achievements and an essential foundation for our work.

Naturally, we welcome the initialling of the peace treaty between Armenia and Azerbaijan and call for its swift signing and ratification. It is extremely positive to witness concrete actions being taken on the ground between the Armenian and Azerbaijani authorities. The delimitation process is being discussed; demining activities are visible; and the Peace Bridge Initiative visits are ongoing. The signing of the Peace Agreement would be a major development for peace and stability in the region.

Given the negative attitude of official Baku towards the mission, are there areas where indirect or technical engagement with Azerbaijani counterparts could reduce misperceptions of EUMA’s activities, in your view?

We remain open to engagement with Azerbaijani stakeholders. For example, we have participated in some media initiatives, including with the Topchubashov Center. We have also cooperated with PressClub TV through joint initiatives involving the Yerevan and Baku Press Clubs.

We continue to look for opportunities to support programmes that bring together Armenians, Azerbaijanis, and others from across the region. Such initiatives can help foster dialogue, mutual understanding, and confidence.

I would also like to emphasise the impartial nature of our work. We report to EU Member States on all relevant developments along the Armenia–Azerbaijan border, regardless of which side is involved. We strive to carry out our mandate in the most transparent, objective, and professional manner possible.

Prime Minister Pashinyan’s election victory is likely to provide policy continuity in Yerevan, including on the peace agenda with Azerbaijan and Armenia’s closer engagement with the EU. He has also not secured the kind of overwhelming mandate that would make difficult domestic compromises easy. In the immediate aftermath of the 7 June vote, does anything change for EUMA? Does Pashinyan's victory make the mission’s work clearer, more complicated, or essentially unchanged?

We welcome the democratic choice of the Armenian people and hope that the outcome of the elections will contribute to continued peace, stability, and prosperity in Armenia. As for EUMA’s work, the Mission was deployed at the invitation of the Armenian Government, and its mandate was agreed upon by Armenia and the European Union. The current mandate runs until February 2027. EUMA continues to carry out its work impartially and in full accordance with its mandate, maintaining a regular and visible presence in border communities. Any decisions regarding potential changes to the Mission’s mandate or activities would be a matter for agreement between Armenia and the European Union.

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)