We salute the women peace-builders of the Caucasus

On International International Women's Day we salute the brave women of the Caucasus who over the last decades have defied critics to promote peace and reconciliation. Joseph Alexander Smith has been talking to some of them.

International Women's Day on 8th March was typically observed with great pomp in the Soviet Union as a celebration of women's liberation from domestic slavery through healthcare, education and labour. Over the last quarter century, however, women's lives in the South Caucasus have been transformed by bitter conflict and massive social upheaval. So, what does this holiday mean for women in the region today?

A Soviet poster from 1932 celebrating International Women's Day depicts an emancipated Socialist woman brandishing a red banner in one hand, and with the other dragging another woman from under a pile of dirty cooking pots and dusty carpets. The message is clear: "March 8th is the day of rebellion of the working woman against kitchen slavery." In the background, workers march triumphantly past glowing factories.

As the last century progressed, however, and working women became the rule rather than the exception, International Women's Day morphed into a more generalized celebration - something between Mothers' Day and Valentine's Day - with flowers, gifts and other tokens of appreciation given by men to the women they love.

"March 8th reminds me of my childhood" says Manana Gogokhia, a journalist living and working in the Gali region of Abkhazia "when everyone was happy and joyful ... women would dress themselves up and there was a smell of flowers everywhere which sticks in my mind to this day.Nowadays, I usually meet with my best friends for dinner; we give each other presents, forget our problems and enjoy ourselves."

However, International Women's Day is also an opportunity to commemorate the achievements made by women as peace-builders in a region riven by conflict. The women's "White Scarf Movement" was active in protesting the conflict between Georgians and Abkhaz in the early 1990s, and to this day organisations such as the Swedish group Kvinna till Kvinna actively promote the activities of women as peace-builders. Manana herself worked on producing the Gali-based magazine Woman and Peace and continues to touch on this theme in her journalism.

"Women make good diplomats" she says, "and they ought to be involved in any peace-process. They're very humanitarian and they can create solid conditions for peace and find ways to avoid conflict in the first place."

"Women's participation [in peace-building] can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the causes of these conflicts and alternative solutions" says Tbilisi-based feminist activist EleneTamazovna, "especially if we consider that many Georgian, Abkhazian and Ossetian women share the same cultural background, customs and [to some extent] the same language ... They share the loss and turbulence of being at war or being in constant danger of war. Hence, direct interaction of these women may lead to a better conflict prevention and help ensure that peace agreements are not narrow, elite pacts, and are supported and sustained by nations as a whole."

It seems certain that - however they may chose to celebrate it this year for the 107th time- International Women's Day still means a great deal to women in the South Caucasus. What's less clear is whether the monumental efforts that women continue to make as peace-builders across conflict divides can bring about a fundamental transformation in the conflicts of the South Caucasus at the political level. Given the astounding transformations in women's lives over the last 107 years, however, there still seems to be room for optimism. 

source Joseph Alexander Smith filed this report from Tbilisi for commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Finland hosts European Arctic Summit

Finland hosts European Arctic Summit

The Arctic summit of European leaders will be held in Rovaniemi, a municipality in Northern Finland on 13–14 September. Prime Minister Petteri Orpo has invited a group of EU leaders to the summit. The aim of the summit is to strengthen the EU’s common strategic approach to the Arctic region as its geopolitical significance continues to grow rapidly. “The Arctic region is an increasingly important part of Europe's security environment. The European Union has direct interests in its stability, security and sustainable development. It is very valuable to be able to discuss these issues together with a comprehensive group of EU leaders,” said Orpo. The summit will be attended by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk, Prime Minister of Denmark Mette Frederiksen, Prime Minister of Estonia Kristen Michal, Prime Minister of Latvia Andris Kulbergs, President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda and President of Romania Nicușor Dan. President of the European Council António Costa and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas will also take part in the summit. The summit is taking place against an extremely dynamic backdrop. In the face of accelerating climate change and geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, the economic importance of the northeast passage is growing. For 2026, more than forty million tonnes of freight are expected to pass through the Northern Sea Route for the first time, primarily due to expanded trade between Russia and China. Furthermore, in August, China launched its first regular container service through the Arctic. Finally, the EU’s Arctic policy itself is set for a reorientation: the Commission intends to present an updated Arctic strategy this autumn, in which security is to play a central role for the first time. Kaja Kallas had already advocated for this at the Arctic Frontiers conference in Tromsø earlier this year, stating that the Arctic needed more attention, more resources, and more hard power. The summit in Rovaniemi can therefore also be seen as a dress rehearsal for the new strategy. Finland brings a unique perspective to this debate: over 95 per cent of Finland’s foreign trade in goods is conducted by sea, and its ports freeze over almost every winter. This structural peculiarity has given rise to a strong export sector in the field of icebreakers: Finnish companies have designed around 80 per cent of all icebreakers worldwide and built around 60 per cent; even the US Coast Guard is having the first vessels of its new Arctic Security Cutter class built in Finland because the domestic alternative could not meet the schedule. The fact that this leverage can also be utilised geopolitically has already been successfully demonstrated. At the end of September 2022, the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs refused to grant an export licence for an LNG icebreaker ordered by the Russian mining group Norilsk Nickel, thereby bringing to an end a project that would have created around 2,100 person-years of employment. (click the image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)