"We Have a Right to Know the TRUTH about the death of our children!"

Parents of Armenian army recruits who died in recent years are concerned that they are not being told the truth about the circumstances of the deaths. The NGO "Peace Dialogue" is leading a campaign for more information. Edgar Khachtryan writes from Vanadzor for commonspace.eu

The Armenian NGO "Peace Dialogue" has launched a video campaign called "We Have a Right to Know the TRUTH!" The campaign consists of a series 30-second video-interviews with members of the families of soldiers who died in the Armenian Army in non-combat conditions. The focus of the videos is to allow the relatives to express their right to know what happened to their sons, husbands and brothers. We have found in our work documenting these deaths in the Safe Soldiers for a Safe Armenia project that many families do not believe the version of the "fatal accidents" that resulted in the death of their family members that is often the official explanation of the deaths given to families.

According to several civil society groups, more than 200 soldiers have died in the Armenian Military during the last five years (For more information see www.safesoldiers.am). Many died as a result of violations of the cease-fire regime signed between Armenian and Azerbaijanis in 1994 after the Nagorno-Karabakh war. However, during these same years many others died as a result of other internal issues: suicides, murders, fatal incidents or because of lack of access to medical service in their military units.

At the end of 2014, "Peace Dialogue" filed a lawsuit in order to obtain information on the fatalities of persons serving in the military from the Ministry of Defense in Armenia (MoD). The Administrative Court of the Republic of Armenia (RA) has now decided to allow the lawsuit to proceed and will soon hold hearings on two cases related to this most important issue. 

The first case would oblige the Ministry of Defense to provide information including; the full names of the deceased soldiers, the location of the incident, the date, unit number, unit commander's full name and title, the cause of death and all other publicly available information. The second part of the lawsuit calls for administrative penalties against Defence Minister Seyran Ohanyan for ignoring the requests to provide this information, as his Ministry is required to do under Armenian law.

Recently two state institutions: the MoD and the General Prosecutor's office refused to provide related information to other civil society groups on this issue. They justified their refusal, by explaining that the required information is classified, was not to be published and could only be viewed with restricted access.

"Peace Dialogue" argues that the required information should not be classified, as it does not fall under the restrictions prescribed in the RA legislation. Furthermore, the MoD had previously provided the same information to "Peace Dialogue"  for the time period of 2010 to 2011. Apart from that, some of the information requested by "Peace Dialogue" is already being released   by the MoD in its own press releases and public statements. The Armenian legislation prescribes that even in cases when the inquiry contains classified information, the officials are still obliged to provide the rest of the information, which was not what happened in this situation.

A number of cases have been recorded by "Peace Dialogue" and other watchdog groups in Armenia, which clearly show that sometimes the official version does not reflect what really happened. "Peace Dialogue" argues that investigative bodies have violated legal procedures during the preliminary investigation or/and judicial processes. In some cases civil society oversight of the military, made it possible to reach a reasonable resolution of the issues.

The "We Have a Right to Know the TRUTH!" campaign aims at increasing public accessibility to information regarding the fatal casualties in the army. "Peace Dialogue" believes that this accessibility will help form public demand for more transparency in order to prevent additional illegalities and falsifications of the investigations in the Armenian Army.

Source: Edgar Khachtryan contributed this article to commonspace.eu

Photo: The Armenian Army on parade. Parents of army recruits who died in recent years are however concerned that they are not being told the truth about the circumstances of the deaths (archive picture).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)