TODAY'S ZAMAN:

Turkey can go ahead and ratify the protocols that have been signed between the Armenian and Turkish governments. The Turkish government could issue an apology for the unfortunate acts of the past that it was not responsible for, writes Dogu Ergil in his item in Today's Zaman.

Armenia and Turkey signed the "Protocol on the establishment of diplomatic relations" and the "Protocol on the development of bilateral relations" in Zurich on October 10.  Following Turkey's unwillingness to ratify the protocols and attempts to link ratification with the Karabakh conflict made President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan sign a decree on suspension of the procedure of ratification of the Armenian -Turkish protocols. After the protocols were removed from agenda of the Turkish parliament in August 2011 as the term of the parliament of the previous convocation expired, in some two months they were returned to the agenda of the Turkish national assembly. However, the term of their ratification has not been determined yet.

Ergil thinks that Turks have 3 reasons not to recognize the Armenian Genocide: "1 -- As a matter of identity. They do not want to be recognized as the grandchildren of people who have been labeled criminals. 2 -- As a matter of the founding myth of the state. The fact that the Turkish state is built on extermination and assimilation of other peoples is a frustrating notion. 3 -- As a matter of enforcement that may entail criminal charges and retribution (in kind or liquid assets for property and businesses lost, as well as children left behind)." He writes that "Turkey has not developed any legal definition of the past (1915) events and there is no plausible explanation why Anatolia as a whole was depopulated of Armenians and that their losses were not compensated."

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Leaders urge 'de-escalation' as G7 Summit in Canada is overshadowed by Middle East conflict

Leaders urge 'de-escalation' as G7 Summit in Canada is overshadowed by Middle East conflict

The G7 summit, a gathering of major world leaders meeting at Kananaskis, in the Canadian Rockies, has concluded with a joint leaders statement urging a "de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza". It stopped short of calling for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The leaders' statement, published as US President Trump left Canada, said Israel had a right to defend itself, and that Iran was a source of terror that should not have a nuclear weapon. According to the BBC, its call for a resolution of the crisis that led to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East amounted to a diplomatic compromise that preserved G7 unity but watered down the statement's impact.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Leaders urge 'de-escalation' as G7 Summit in Canada is overshadowed by Middle East conflict

Leaders urge 'de-escalation' as G7 Summit in Canada is overshadowed by Middle East conflict

The G7 summit, a gathering of major world leaders meeting at Kananaskis, in the Canadian Rockies, has concluded with a joint leaders statement urging a "de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza". It stopped short of calling for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The leaders' statement, published as US President Trump left Canada, said Israel had a right to defend itself, and that Iran was a source of terror that should not have a nuclear weapon. According to the BBC, its call for a resolution of the crisis that led to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East amounted to a diplomatic compromise that preserved G7 unity but watered down the statement's impact.