THEY MUST GET THIS RIGHT. After something of a false start, the relations between the government of Bidhzina Ivanishvili in Georgia and Armenia get a boost with the first official visit by the Prime Minister to Yerevan.

Georgia's Prime Minister Bidhzina Ivanishvili is in Yerevan, on his first official visit to Armenia since taking office in October. He was received by Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and the two premiers already had one round of discussions. Ivanishvili will also meet with the President of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan and with the Catholicos of the Armenian Apostolic Church Karekin I.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment:

"Relations between Armenians and Georgians go back centuries, and the two nations share many common heritages, including a Christian faith, many common customs and a shared Soviet past. Yet the relationship has always been complex. Competition between Armenians and Georgians sometimes goes beyond being healthy.

Three factors have determined the relations between the newly independent states of Armenia and Georgia in the last twenty years: (1) The presence in Georgia of a large Armenian community, some in Tbilisi itself, and others compactly settled in the region of Samskhe Javakheti; (2) the very different relationship that the two countries have had with Russia, with Armenia being a close ally of Moscow, whilst Tbilisi fought a war with Russia in 2008; and (3) Armenia's continued dependance on Georgia for land communication with the rest of the world, given the blockade imposed on it by Turkey, and the continued state of war with Azerbaijan.

Different administrations in both countries have over the years taken a pragmatic approach to their bilateral relations, based on need and expedience. Both sides have closed one eye to the other's actions on more than one occasion in order to keep relations on track. At times relations plummeted but not for long. Until last year relations between Georgia's president Saakashvili and Armenia's President Serzh Sargsyan were hailed by the two sides as excellent.

This may have clouded perception as Georgia went through a difficult election campaign in 2012, leading up to a change of government in October. Saakashvili remains President, but power has moved to his opponents. The Armenians, like the Georgians, are not used to political co-habitation, and for a moment they blinked.

On the Georgian side there was also a moment of hesitation until the relationship could be once more calibrated.

It is hoped that the visit of Ivanishvili to Yerevan will consolidate the process. Georgia needs to maintain good relations with Armenia whilst not upsetting its other neighbour Azerbaijan. Both are important for Georgia, but in very different ways.

Armenia on its part needs Georgia more than ever if it is to avoid isolation.

There are many issues that the two sides need to discuss, and many problems to solve. The visit provides a good opportunity to do so. They must get this right, as a lot depends on keeping this relationship healthy -  for both countries and for the region."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The delegation led by the Georgian Prime Minister Bidhzina Ivanishvili in meetings with Armenian Ministers in Yerevan on 17 January 2013. (picture courtesy of the Bidhzina Ivanishvili facebook page.)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)