Searching for their roots?

The diplomats from France, Russia and the United States who co-chair the so-called "OSCE Minsk Process" are in the Belarussian capital today, ostensibly for consultations with the country's government. The news came in a tweet this morning by the US representative, Ambassador James Warlick.

The OSCE Minsk Process emerged in the early 1990s from a decision taken in March 1992 by the Council of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE) to convene a conference in Minsk in an effort to resolve the conflict that was raging between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. Belarus as the host of the proposed conference was one of a number of countries entrusted to prepare for the conference. Eventually the group appointed the three co-Chair that are still there today. Twenty three years later the Minsk Conference has yet to be convened, and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict - very much unfrozen, rages on with daily incidents and large number of fatalities.

Commonspace.eu political editor commented on the significance of the visit of the co-Chair to Minsk:

"The visit of the co-Chair of the Minsk Process to the city whose name they bear, exactly twenty three years to the month since the decision to convene the Minsk Conference was taken, is full of symbolism. As far as one can remember this is the first time that the co-Chair have visited Minsk for a long time, if ever. Ofcourse it can simply be a routine visit, as was suggested. On the other hand the visit inevitably raises questions regarding the roots of the Minsk Process, and the fact that the original mission of the group was to convene a conference in Minsk. That decision, taken 23 years ago, is now long overdue. Are the co-Chair simply searching for their roots, or is this the first sign that the Minsk Conference is back on the agenda? Given that everything else seems to have failed, and that the question of Karabakh remains the most serious current crisis in the South Caucasus, that option must now surely be given serious consideration. In some respects the timing is right. Minsk is currently basking in its new role as a centre of diplomatic activity. Its close but ambiguous relationship with Russia allows Belarus to play a specific role in the current turbulent European security relations. So a visit to Minsk by the co-Chair is timely, as would be the convening of the Minsk Conference."

source: commonspace.eu

Photo: Ambassdors Pierre Andrieu of France, Igor Popov of Russia and James Warlick of the United States (picture courtesy of Armenian Public Radio).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular