Searching for their roots?

The diplomats from France, Russia and the United States who co-chair the so-called "OSCE Minsk Process" are in the Belarussian capital today, ostensibly for consultations with the country's government. The news came in a tweet this morning by the US representative, Ambassador James Warlick.

The OSCE Minsk Process emerged in the early 1990s from a decision taken in March 1992 by the Council of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE) to convene a conference in Minsk in an effort to resolve the conflict that was raging between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. Belarus as the host of the proposed conference was one of a number of countries entrusted to prepare for the conference. Eventually the group appointed the three co-Chair that are still there today. Twenty three years later the Minsk Conference has yet to be convened, and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict - very much unfrozen, rages on with daily incidents and large number of fatalities.

Commonspace.eu political editor commented on the significance of the visit of the co-Chair to Minsk:

"The visit of the co-Chair of the Minsk Process to the city whose name they bear, exactly twenty three years to the month since the decision to convene the Minsk Conference was taken, is full of symbolism. As far as one can remember this is the first time that the co-Chair have visited Minsk for a long time, if ever. Ofcourse it can simply be a routine visit, as was suggested. On the other hand the visit inevitably raises questions regarding the roots of the Minsk Process, and the fact that the original mission of the group was to convene a conference in Minsk. That decision, taken 23 years ago, is now long overdue. Are the co-Chair simply searching for their roots, or is this the first sign that the Minsk Conference is back on the agenda? Given that everything else seems to have failed, and that the question of Karabakh remains the most serious current crisis in the South Caucasus, that option must now surely be given serious consideration. In some respects the timing is right. Minsk is currently basking in its new role as a centre of diplomatic activity. Its close but ambiguous relationship with Russia allows Belarus to play a specific role in the current turbulent European security relations. So a visit to Minsk by the co-Chair is timely, as would be the convening of the Minsk Conference."

source: commonspace.eu

Photo: Ambassdors Pierre Andrieu of France, Igor Popov of Russia and James Warlick of the United States (picture courtesy of Armenian Public Radio).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)