Russian triumphalism will not last. The Russian elite seeks the respect of the west but ends up with the contempt of the rest of the world.

Russia has formally annexed Crimea as part of the Russian Federation after a defiant speech by President Putin to the two houses of the Russian Parliament yesterday. This is a commentary by the political editor of commonspace.eu

The world has woken up this morning to a defiant and belligerent Russia that is still celebrating the formal annexation yesterday of the Crimean Peninsula to the Russian Federation.  There is now amongst the Russian elite a triumphalist mood, of the sort that Europe has not seen amongst its politicians for many years.

The annexation of Crimea came after a speedy process of not more than three weeks that saw Russian troops entering the peninsula on the most flimsy of excuses, and flagrantly violating the territory of Ukraine - a friendly neighbouring country.

Some, even in the west are saying that perhaps Crimea was always Russian and is returning to where it belonged. They miss an important point. Russia had until last month not claimed Crimea back. It had recognized Ukraine within the borders of the Ukraine SSR when the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. It was in fact one of three great powers guaranteeing the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Russian action cannot therefore be justified by history.

But this is not about Crimea at all. This is about Russia’s greatness. And it is not about Mr Putin either. He reflects accurately the mood of the Russian political elite.

Western leaders in the last quarter century misunderstood Russia. They offered Russia friendship but dealt with it condescendingly. Russia was never interested in friendship. It was interested in being treated as an equal – an equal that is of the United States and its allies. Russia’s membership of the G8 – seen by the west as a concession to Russia, was not what Russia sought and seeks. Russia does not see itself as an equal to Italy or Canada. What Russia is interested in is the G2 where Russia is the equal and the counterbalance to the US and its allies. Ironically, at least for the moment, the Crimea crisis is giving it this status.

This new situation has however  thrown the world into great uncertainty, and it will take years for a new order to return to the international system.

Russia’s triumphalist mood will likely be short-lived. Russia today has neither the ideological cover that Communism provided, nor the isolated economic system that insulated it from global process. It depends on global processes, as much as any other country. Russia’s bet therefore is that the international furore over Crimea will abet, as soon as western leaders take their eye of the case. Russia can then consolidate and prepare for its next move. This is not going to happen, simply because the stakes are now too high. The process of rebuilding a new European and global order will have to start and will take a long time. In the meantime Russia has lost the friendship of western countries. Its elite may decide they do not care about this as long as they have the respect of the west. At the moment however the mood towards Moscow is less of respect and more of contempt. Is this really what the Russian elite wants?

source: commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)