Presence of Azeri snipers is an alternative to military action for Ilham Aliyev

Several non-governmental organizations of Nagorno-Karabakh have come out with an open letter. The authors of 
the letter urge the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs to call spade a spade
and adequately assess the presence of Azeri snipers on the contact
line of the NKR and Azerbaijani Armed Forces. The letter says that
despite the constant threats of Azeri President Ilham Aliyev to start
a war, he is incapable and has no desire to do that.

"The main reason of that is the lack of confidence in his army and
the understanding that the war will first of all deliver a blow on
his own positions", the letter say. "What to do? How to confirm his
military rhetoric by actions and to keep his people in the state of
permanent war without starting a real war and without endangering his
own power?", the authors say. They point out that the active use of
snipers has become the best solution, as the sniper war with minimum
fire causes a lot more human losses than the intensive fire from
basic weapons.

The mediators qualify the Azeri snipers' actions as single
"violations of ceasefire" by their quantity, whereas these are quite
active military actions by their intention and consequences. It
should be noted that it is for the mediators to decide how to qualify
the snipers' actions - "ceasefire violation" or "military actions",
the letter says.

The authors of the letter also say that Azerbaijan does not only
refuses pointblank the bilateral withdrawal of snipers, but also
openly increases their number on the line of contact. "Taking his
lead from Azerbaijan, the OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Lithuanian Foreign
Minister Audronius Azubalis offers Karabakh to withdraw the snipers
in the unilateral way instead of condemning Azerbaijan's refusal from
bilateral withdrawal", the document says and adds that hereby
Azubalis is trying to add military impunity to the political impunity
of Azerbaijan.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)