Opinion: The visit of US Vice President Pence to Georgia is a game-changer

Opinion: In this op-ed, Dennis Sammut says that the visit of US Vice President Mike Pence to Georgia was a game changer. "It can help to make the Russians more aware of US and NATO commitment to Georgia. It gives the Georgians some comfort with regards to their security concerns. It should also give them more confidence to engage more with Abkhazia and South Ossetia as part of a process to find a lasting and peaceful solution to the region's conflicts."

United States Vice President Mike Pence this week conducted a whirlwind trip to three parts of Europe that have in recent years and months been the subject of overt bullying by an assertive Russian military. The Vice President visited Estonia, in the Baltic region, Georgia, in the Caucasus and Montenegro, in the Balkans. In all three countries, he heard local leader's concerns about Russian pressures, and expressed unequivocal US support. It was a show of commitment, it was necessary, and it was overdue.

Friends of the United States that are closest geographically to Russia have been feeling the heat of Russian pressure for years. But things seem to have got worse in the last year as Russia tried to use the opportunity offered because of a troubled political process in Washington to score advantages. Smaller countries, such as Estonia, Georgia and Montenegro seem to have been particularly targeted.

Often in his speeches during the trip, Vice president Pence emphasised that he was visiting on behalf of President Trump. His speeches however sounded more as if he was visiting on behalf of the Pentagon. The American military and security establishment is deeply worried about the shenanigans going on in the White House and the havoc it is causing among the country's closest allies. In some respect therefore, Pence's visit was a damage limitation exercise, an attempt to calm nerves and send a message to the Russians that the US still cared about these regions, and will act if their future is threathened. But this was only part of the story. In Estonia and in Montenegro - both NATO members, all Pence had to do was to remind everyone that as NATO members these countries benefited from the collective defence blanket that is the core of the North Atlantic Treaty. It is unlikely that the Russian's had forgotten, but the reminder was timely anyway.

It is in Georgia however that Pence's visit can be seen as a potential game-changer. Georgia is not a NATO member despite its enthusiasm to join the alliance. It has experienced first-hand Russian aggression, formalised with the establishment of Russian protectorates in the secessionist territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Russia has failed to honour its commitments in the framework of the Sarkozy-Medvedev agreement in the aftermath of the August 2008 Georgia-Russia war, which resulted in further encroachment on Georgian territory. And even in recent weeks the process of encroachment continues as Russia tries to align the territory of the self-declared republic of South Ossetia to that of the South Ossetian Autonomous Oblast under Soviet times - a visible expression that President Putin has more regard for Soviet law than he has for international law.

Pence's visit to Georgia came nearly nine years to the day of the August 2008 Georgia-Russia War, and coincided (or more likely was timed to coincide) with the largest military exercises NATO has ever held in Georgia.

Heavy American military equipment of the US 2nd Cavalry Regiment, including tanks, artillery and armoured vehicles, landed on Georgia's Black Sea coast days before Pence's arrival, and were transported by rail, or driven, to the Vaziani Military base at the centre of the country where the military drills are ongoing, lasting until 12 August.  On their way, they passed within a few hundred meters of Russian troops.

This, some may claim, was just theatrics. In part this is true, but it is the sort of theatrics that the present Russian leadership understands. Remember the visit of president Putin to Baku in 2013, with the entire Russian Caspian flotilla anchored in Baku harbour, or Putin's visit to the military base in Gyumri in Armenia, and his speech on why Russian leaders should not give up what they inherited from their grandfathers. The NATO show of strength would therefore not have gone unnoticed in Moscow.

In Georgia, Vice President Pence made the clearest US commitment yet to Georgia, its independence and territorial integrity, and its NATO membership aspirations regardless of Russian opposition to it. "We are with you", he told Georgian leaders - twice, in case they missed it the first time. Standing in front of an American tank a few kilometres away from where Russia deploys illegally thousands of its troops in South Ossetia, Pence declared:

"Today, we recommit ourselves to the cause of security, prosperity and liberty for the people of Georgia," Pence said. "We renew our pledge to stand together in unity, as partners and as friends. To one day, stand together as Allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization."

And to make sure there was no ambiguity, he later tweeted,

"To be clear: The United States of America strongly condemns Russia's occupation of Georgia's soil."

All this was, given the present reality, necessary. A clear message has been sent. The Russians will fail to understand it at their own peril.

One needs however to add some words of caution.

The charge of the US Cavalry, from their bases in Germany to the heart of the Caucasus was painfully slow and logistically cumbersome. US support for Georgia's defence remains more symbolic than tangible, simply because defending the country, given its geographical location, is not easy. It is likely that membership or not, NATO has some contingency planning of how it can support Georgia in case of Russian aggression. In the present configuration however, even if the political will is there, it would be something difficult to implement. The military folk understand these constraints well, and their political masters should do so too.

This week many senior Georgian officials were feeling quite smug with what they were able to achieve - getting Vice President Pence to visit Georgia was already a success; his clear and unambiguous speeches were more than they expected, and they were clearly delighted. It will however be a big, even fatal, mistake if the Georgian authorities read more in the US expression of support than they should.

For domestic political purposes, it is important to remember that ever since the time of Eduard Shevardnadze Georgia's best friends in the US were in the Pentagon. It is more than likely that Pence was in Georgia primarily at the Pentagon's behest. Georgian leaders need to interpret the visit for domestic political purposes in a responsible way.

More significantly, Georgian leaders should not interpret Pence's visit or his statements, as a carte blanche for adventurism, as may have happened in the past. Present Georgian leaders have shown more caution, and have overall acted responsibly. But one senses the presence of itchy fingers in some quarters. They need to be reminded that Pence in his speeches also spoke on the importance of dialogue. Tbilisi has not yet exhausted all possibilities of dialogue with Sukhumi and Tskhinvali, and remains overly concerned with the formalities, and less with the substance. Georgian leaders need to see their strengthened hand as a chance to show magnanimity.

The visit of Vice President Pence to Georgia is potentially a game changer. It can help to make the Russians more aware of US and NATO commitment to Georgia. It gives the Georgians some comfort with regards to their security concerns and brings their NATO membership asspirations firmly back onm the agenda. It should also give them more confidence to engage more with Abkhazia and South Ossetia as part of a process to find a lasting and peaceful solution to the region's conflicts.

Dennis Sammut is the director of LINKS (Dialogue, Analysis and Research). He contributed this op-ed for commonspace.eu. He may be contacted at dennis@links-dar.org

photo: Vice President Mike Pence and American and Georgian troops at Exercise Noble Partner, August 1, 2017; Official White House Photo by Myles D. Cullen. (picture courtesy of the White House)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Bonn Dialogue Meeting calls for the theme "Climate Change, Peace and Security" to be included in the agenda of COP29

Bonn Dialogue Meeting calls for the theme "Climate Change, Peace and Security" to be included in the agenda of COP29

A dialogue meeting on the topic: “Climate Change Peace and Security – COP 29 and Beyond” was held at the Bonn University Club in Bonn, Germany, on Friday, 3 May 2024. Representatives of various state-parties to the Climate Convention and of the UN Climate Secretariat, joined participants from around 30 academic institutions, think tanks and civil society organisations to review the work done on this topic at COP28 in Dubai in December and chart a way forward for ensuring the continuation of the process at the COP29 meeting in Baku in November. At the opening session, the meeting was addressed by HE Hana al Hashemi, the United Arab Emirates COP28 Chief negotiator, HE Nigar Arpadarai, the UN High-Level Champion for COP29 in Azerbaijan, and Mr Markus Hicken, Director for Energy Foreign Policy, Climate and Security at the German Federal Foreign Office. Also speaking at the opening session was Ms Maria Paloma Noriega Jalil, representing the UN Climate Secretariat. There followed an intensive one-day of discussions on the current state of the COP process, and the on-going debate on the nexus of Climate Change, Peace and Security within the COP process. The meeting was addressed by world-class experts from leading think tanks and academic institutions, including Chatham House, the German Council on Foreign Relations, ADELPHI, the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, Heidelberg University, The Hertie School in Berlin, amongst others. The meeting positively assessed the steps taken in COP28 in Dubai in December, including the inclusion of climate change, peace and security as a theme of the meeting, the holding for the first time of a day on peace in the deliberations, and the “COP28 Declaration on Climate, Relief, Recovery and Peace”. It was felt that it was important that this momentum will not be lost, and similar actions are also included as part of the COP29 meeting in Baku in November. Whilst it was recognised that the nexus between Climate Change Peace and Security was now widely recognised internationally, inserting this in the COP process remained an issue under discussion. During the meeting three aspects of the Climate Change, Peace and Security agenda were highlighted, namely water scarcity; food insecurity; and landmine contamination and environmental degradation resulting from conflict. Participants called on the State Parties to the Climate Convention meeting in the context of COP29 to ensure proper discussion and action on these themes that affect millions of people and thousands of communities across the world. In his concluding remarks at the end of the dialogue meeting, HE Ambassador Elshad Iskanderov, advisor to the COP 29 presidency, said that Azerbaijan was positive to the idea of having Climate Change Peace and Security as a theme at COP29. Ambassador Iskanderov reminded that the decision to hold COP29 in Baku was taken unanimously, and was an unprecedented confidence-building measure in the context of the South Caucasus.  Azerbaijan wanted to build on what had already been achieved in Dubai. He said that these decisions did not depend on Azerbaijan alone since COP was a multilateral process where the 198 state parties had the final say. Ambassador Iskanderov underlined the readiness of the Azerbaijani COP29 presidency to continue the dialogue on this issue with academia, think tanks and civil society as the preparations for COP 29 progress. He highlighted the fact that the discussion needs to focus not only on the potential that climate change will fuel more conflict and insecurity, but also on the impact of conflicts on climate change and environmental degradation Concluding the Bonn Dialogue Meeting, Dr Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe Foundation, who together with Candid Foundation and ReStart Initiative hosted the Bonn event, said that a lot of work needs to be done between now and November, and particularly the dialogue with the COP Troika countries, the UN Climate Secretariat and interested state parties needs to be continued and intensified. As a concrete step, LINKS Europe will set up an ad hoc working group with other interested non-state actors, to ensure that the conversation continues, and tangible results are achieved.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Bonn Dialogue Meeting calls for the theme "Climate Change, Peace and Security" to be included in the agenda of COP29

Bonn Dialogue Meeting calls for the theme "Climate Change, Peace and Security" to be included in the agenda of COP29

A dialogue meeting on the topic: “Climate Change Peace and Security – COP 29 and Beyond” was held at the Bonn University Club in Bonn, Germany, on Friday, 3 May 2024. Representatives of various state-parties to the Climate Convention and of the UN Climate Secretariat, joined participants from around 30 academic institutions, think tanks and civil society organisations to review the work done on this topic at COP28 in Dubai in December and chart a way forward for ensuring the continuation of the process at the COP29 meeting in Baku in November. At the opening session, the meeting was addressed by HE Hana al Hashemi, the United Arab Emirates COP28 Chief negotiator, HE Nigar Arpadarai, the UN High-Level Champion for COP29 in Azerbaijan, and Mr Markus Hicken, Director for Energy Foreign Policy, Climate and Security at the German Federal Foreign Office. Also speaking at the opening session was Ms Maria Paloma Noriega Jalil, representing the UN Climate Secretariat. There followed an intensive one-day of discussions on the current state of the COP process, and the on-going debate on the nexus of Climate Change, Peace and Security within the COP process. The meeting was addressed by world-class experts from leading think tanks and academic institutions, including Chatham House, the German Council on Foreign Relations, ADELPHI, the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, Heidelberg University, The Hertie School in Berlin, amongst others. The meeting positively assessed the steps taken in COP28 in Dubai in December, including the inclusion of climate change, peace and security as a theme of the meeting, the holding for the first time of a day on peace in the deliberations, and the “COP28 Declaration on Climate, Relief, Recovery and Peace”. It was felt that it was important that this momentum will not be lost, and similar actions are also included as part of the COP29 meeting in Baku in November. Whilst it was recognised that the nexus between Climate Change Peace and Security was now widely recognised internationally, inserting this in the COP process remained an issue under discussion. During the meeting three aspects of the Climate Change, Peace and Security agenda were highlighted, namely water scarcity; food insecurity; and landmine contamination and environmental degradation resulting from conflict. Participants called on the State Parties to the Climate Convention meeting in the context of COP29 to ensure proper discussion and action on these themes that affect millions of people and thousands of communities across the world. In his concluding remarks at the end of the dialogue meeting, HE Ambassador Elshad Iskanderov, advisor to the COP 29 presidency, said that Azerbaijan was positive to the idea of having Climate Change Peace and Security as a theme at COP29. Ambassador Iskanderov reminded that the decision to hold COP29 in Baku was taken unanimously, and was an unprecedented confidence-building measure in the context of the South Caucasus.  Azerbaijan wanted to build on what had already been achieved in Dubai. He said that these decisions did not depend on Azerbaijan alone since COP was a multilateral process where the 198 state parties had the final say. Ambassador Iskanderov underlined the readiness of the Azerbaijani COP29 presidency to continue the dialogue on this issue with academia, think tanks and civil society as the preparations for COP 29 progress. He highlighted the fact that the discussion needs to focus not only on the potential that climate change will fuel more conflict and insecurity, but also on the impact of conflicts on climate change and environmental degradation Concluding the Bonn Dialogue Meeting, Dr Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe Foundation, who together with Candid Foundation and ReStart Initiative hosted the Bonn event, said that a lot of work needs to be done between now and November, and particularly the dialogue with the COP Troika countries, the UN Climate Secretariat and interested state parties needs to be continued and intensified. As a concrete step, LINKS Europe will set up an ad hoc working group with other interested non-state actors, to ensure that the conversation continues, and tangible results are achieved.