Opinion: There is still a chance Russia will be a spoiler in the Armenia-Turkey normalisation process

As long as Turkey maintains a fairly neutral stance on the Ukraine issue, Russia will not interfere in the current efforts to normalise Armenian-Turkish relations, says Benyamin Poghosyan in this op-ed. "However, if Turkey changes its policy towards Russia, and joins the anti-Russian sanctions the situation may change. In such case, this may break the Russian – Turkish understanding for the post-2020 South Caucasus. Russia may assume the role of spoiler in the Armenia – Turkey normalization process, significantly slowing down the movement towards establishing diplomatic relations and opening up borders."      

Since February 24, 2022, the world's attention has been focused on the war in Ukraine and the rupture of the Russia – West relations. Politicians, experts, and ordinary citizens seek to understand the implications of this crisis and assess the endgame of Russia, Ukraine, and the West. Meanwhile, despite the war in Ukraine, the regional geopolitics of the South Caucasus continues to evolve. The 2020 Karabakh war has significantly impacted the balance of power in the region, making Russia and Turkey the ultimate decision-makers of the future of the South Caucasus. Ankara and Moscow are well aware that they are and will remain competitors in the region, but they decided to compete in a more stable environment. One of the ways to stabilize the post-2020 South Caucasus is through normalizing Armenia – Turkey relations.

Turkey recognized Armenian independence almost immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but did not establish diplomatic relations with Armenia due to the conflict in Karabakh and the Armenian decision to pursue the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide. In April 1993, Turkey closed its border with Armenia, hoping that economic hardships would force Armenia to make concessions. Armenia and Turkey attempted to normalize relations in 2008-2009, but the process failed mainly due to the strong opposition of Azerbaijan.

The 2020 Karabakh war removed one of the main obstacles in the way of Armenia – Turkey normalization. Azerbaijan took adjacent regions around Nagorno Karabakh and 30 percent of territories of NK itself, while the remaining 70 percent was transformed into a Russia-controlled area with the deployment of the Russian peacekeepers. Armenia continues to pay salaries and pensions to Armenians living in the Russia-controlled areas, but Yerevan essentially gave up its role as a security guarantor of Karabakh. Meanwhile, after the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, the issue of Genocide international recognition has lost its previous significance for Turkey. Thus, from a Turkish perspective, two stumbling blocks, Nagorno-Karabakh and international recognition of the Armenian Genocide, have lost their relevance in the context of its long-term relations with Armenia. As for the Armenian government, the ruling party participated in the June 2021 early parliamentary elections with the slogan of ushering an era of peace in the South Caucasus, and normalization of relations with Turkey is a significant part of that agenda. The other external players in the region, the US and EU, supported the Armenia – Turkey normalization since the early 1990s, hoping to stabilize the region and decrease Armenian overdependence on Russia. Thus, all players – Armenia, Turkey, Russia, the US, and the EU, support the normalization process.

Not surprisingly, the process has been accelerated after the June 2021 elections in Armenia. Armenia and Turkey appointed special representatives, who met in Moscow in January 2022 for the first time. The second meeting between Armenian and Turkish representatives occurred in Vienna on February 24, 2022, on the day Russia launched its Ukrainian "special military operation."  News of the second meeting was buried under the reports of the war in Ukraine. Still, the meeting was pretty useful as it cleared the way for the Armenian foreign minister's participation in the Antalya diplomatic forum in March 2022. The Armenian foreign minister met with his Turkish counterpart in Antalya, the first high-level Armenia – Turkey meeting in years. The two sides confirmed their readiness to continue the normalization process without preconditions leading up to establishing diplomatic relations and opening borders.

The Armenian foreign minister confirmed these agreements during his speech at the Armenian Parliament standing committee on foreign relations on March 21, 2022. He stated that the Armenian and Turkish sides emphasized the significance of the process of normalization and confirmed that the final result should be the establishment of diplomatic relations and the opening of borders.

However, despite this optimism, many wonder if the war in Ukraine may slow or even derail the Armenia – Turkey normalization process. The critical factor here is the relations between Russia and Turkey. As of now, Turkey pursues a policy of positive neutrality towards Russia rejecting demands to join anti-Russia sanctions and portraying itself as an honest broker between Russia and Ukraine. Turkey successfully organized a meeting between Russian and Ukrainian foreign ministers in Antalya on March 10, 2022, and now makes efforts to organize a potential Putin – Zelensky meeting. Russia is satisfied by this Turkish policy. As far as Turkey continues this path, most probably Russia - Turkey understanding on the post – 2020 future of the South Caucasus will remain in place, including, support to the Armenia – Turkey normalization process. The war in Ukraine has not changed the US and EU's position on this issue. The Euro-Atlantic community continues to push for a Yerevan – Ankara normalization of relations.

However, if Turkey changes its policy towards Russia, and joins the anti-Russian sanctions the situation may change. In such case, this may break the Russian – Turkish understanding for the post-2020 South Caucasus. Russia may assume the role of spoiler in the Armenia – Turkey normalization process, significantly slowing down the movement towards establishing diplomatic relations and opening up borders.       

source: Benyamin Poghosyan is the Founder and Chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan.
photo:   The meeting between the foreign ministers of Armenia and Turkey in Antalya this month was the highest diplomatic contact between the two countries for years.
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

  

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.