Monday Commentary: Trump opens Pandora’s box and Ayatollah Khamanei has the last laugh

On Saturday (28 February) the United States and Israel launched a new war, attacking Iran, even though talks between the US and Iran were on-going in Geneva, and Omani mediators thought that an agreement between the two was within reach. In the first engagement of the new war the US and Israel, targeted and killed Ayatollah Khamanei, Iran’s Supreme Leader, and many other Iranian senior officials.

The war has raged on for the last few days, and has spread quickly to other countries in the region. It is clear we are at the beginning of something big. This is not a local conflict. It is a conflict with global ramifications, and we are only at the start.

A war with unclear objectives

The war has unclear objectives from the two countries that initiated it. Stopping Iran from becoming a nuclear power is one, yet everything suggests that this objective could be reached with negotiations; a second objective is to take out Iran’s military capability, including missiles and drones. The current military campaign will dent Iranian capability, but will not eliminate it. The third objective which was the highlight on Saturday, but has become less pronounced since is “regime change”.

On its part, the Islamic Republic of Iran has one objective – the survival of the system that was put in place after the 1979 revolution. The Supreme Leader will be replaced, as will officials that have been killed. But the system wants to show that it is more durable than mere mortals.

Trump had been told by many, including friends and associates, not to start the war. But the American leader has been emboldened by “successes”, such as his adventure in Venezuela, and was persuaded by Israel’s Netanyahu, who has his own agenda, and ignored all advice and opened “Pandora’s box”. What will come out we can only guess. One thing is sure: the Middle East will never be the same again. The impact on the Gulf states will be huge; for them this is the nightmare scenario. It is turning out worse than they had ever imagined.

Iran

Iran is a country with a long history, and a complex societal fabric. It has a population of over ninety million. According to the US Library of Congress, 65% are Persians (also including Gilaks and Mazenderanis, 16% Azerbaijanis, 7% Kurds, 6% Lurs, 2% Arabs, 2% Balochis, 1% Turkic tribal groups (such as Qashqai), and non-Persian, non-Turkic groups (less than 1%). Whilst Persians provide the core of the population, they are constantly concerned that outsiders will use this diversity to undermine the country’s unity and territorial integrity. This deeply held concern is considered in the present situation too.

Shia Islam

Shia Islam is followed by about 10% of all Muslims, numbering at an estimated 200–260 million followers worldwide as of 2025. Shia Muslims form a majority of the population in Iran, Iraq and Azerbaijan, as well as about half of the citizen population of Bahrain. There are also large Shia communities in Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Turkey, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan and India.

In Iran, Shia Islam is the basis of the state, and the country is ruled by the Shia clergy, who control all aspects of society.

Ayatollah Khamanei has the last laugh

The war opened with the assassination of the Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamanei. Khamanei had been Supreme Leader since 1987, and was both the spiritual leader of all Shias and temporal leader of Iran. But at 86, he was old and frail.

On 28 February he was sitting in his office in Tehran, despite the threat of an imminent US attack. Many had speculated that he had been spirited away to a secret bunker. Apparently Khamanei refused to go. He insisted on following his routine. Khamanei wanted to die as a martyr, and Trump obliged. This fatalism is at the heart of Shia Islam. It explains Iranian stubbornness and resilience. It is something that Americans, and especially Trump, fail to factor in.

No doubt the fact that there will be a new Supreme Leader – only the third since 1979 – will bring some changes to Iran. But the Islamic Republic is a system regardless of who is at the top.

The future

It is very difficult to predict the future in such a volatile situation as has emerged since Saturday. There are no simple explanations or solutions.

But it is likely that the Islamic Republic will endure. The system may, in order to survive, update itself. This is necessary and overdue. But it will not happen under American and Israeli aerial fire.

The Gulf will never be the same again. The relations between Iran and the Gulf countries will be poisoned for a long time. Most GCC countries have the financial cushion to help them pull out of the present crises. But money on this occasion, may not be enough.

The war will also impact the Trump administration. This may prove a gamble too far for the American president.

But for all three, we are only at the beginning. And this story is only just starting, so in truth, anything can happen.

source: Monday commentary is written for commonspace.eu by Dr. Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe, and Managing Editor of commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)