Interview with the Ambassador of Kazakhstan to the EU: "We have very high hopes that the results of the referendum will have deep positive consequences for the future of our country"

On Sunday, 5 June, the people of Kazakhstan voted overwhelmingly in favour of big changes to the country's constitution which envisage a redistribution of presidential powers to various other state organs, a system of checks and balances and a decentalisation of power. The changes complement other ongoing political and economic reforms that have been initiated by president Kassym-Jomart Tokayev over the last three years. Commonspace.eu interviewed Ambassador Margulan Baimukhan, Head of the Mission of Kazakhstan to the European Union about the importance of the Constitutional changes, the role of Kazakhstan in Central Asia and generally about the changes taking place in his country.   "We have very high hopes that the results of the referendum will have deep positive consequences for the future of our country.  It brings us one step closer to become a democratic state. Most importantly for me is that the referendum result paves the way for increasing the participation of the population in the governance of the country. It will nurture the culture of people in standing and defending their rights", the Ambassador said. Ambassador Baimukhan also spoke about the relations of his country with the European Union.  "The European Union was, is and will be at the forefront of our foreign policy agenda".

This is the full interview:

CS: On 5 June, a constitutional referendum took place in Kazakhstan. What changes are envisaged and why are they necessary?

Since his election as President of Kazakhstan in 2019, our Head of State Mr. Kassym-Jomart Tokayev embarked on an irreversible path of political modernisation of the country. He proposed the Concept of a “Listening State” and established a “National Council of Public Trust” which advised on various key issues  related to the political, economic and social aspects of the statehood. President Tokayev has proposed and started implementation of four large scale packages of political and economic reforms.  The holding of a national referendum on June 5, 2022 on introducing amendments and addition of new articles to the Constitution was the next stage in the implementation of the presidential program of political reforms aimed at bettering the lives of the citizen and turning Kazakhstan into a true democratic society.

Overall, it introduces amendments to 31 articles and adds two new ones; in fact it changes a third of the Constitution. So you can see the scale of the changes that are to take place in Kazakhstan. In his televised address in May President Tokayev said “our Constitution will get an entirely new dimension. That is why I proposed to put the issue to a national referendum because such large-scale changes must be decided by the people’s will,”

The political essence of the constitutional reforms is a transition from a super-presidential to a presidential form of government based on constitutionalism. This means voluntarily redistributing the power of the President to other institutions.

President Tokayev’s vision is that the referendum on constitutional reform will create the legal basis for an effective and more balanced model of relations between the state and society.

Without going into details I would like to bring your attention to some of the major amendments that include limiting presidential powers – the President shall not be a member of a political party during his term of office, close relatives of the President shall not have the right to hold positions of political civil servants, and heads of quasi-public companies, the powers of the President to revoke or suspend in whole or in part the acts of the governors and mayors of the regions, cities of national significance and the capital are excluded.

More power will be given to the Parliament–the Senate will no longer be able to make new laws, and instead will approve or reject laws passed by Mazhlis (lower chamber of the Parliament). The number of deputies of the Mazhlis will be reduced from 107 to 98, following the abolition of 9 seats appointed by the Assembly of the Peoples of Kazakhstan, and the Assembly will get to appoint only 5 deputies. Instead of  15 members, the president will now nominate 10 members to the Senate. Six members of the constitutional court will be nominated by the parliament, three each by the national assembly and the senate, and four will be appointed by the president. Mazhilis deputies will be elected according to a mixed system:70% of Mazhilis deputies will be chosen by proportional elections, and 30% will be directly elected.

Other major changes relate to a significant decentralization of power with more competences given to regional and local authorities, thus increasing the participation of the population in the governance of the country, as well as consolidation of human rights protection mechanisms, including the Ombudsperson’s office, and the establishment of the Constitutional Court.

CS: President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev since being elected in 2019 has been introducing a number of reforms in both political and economic spheres. But some say that these reforms are moving slowly. How do you assess the process of reform, and what are the likely future milestones?

Indeed, as I mentioned earlier, President Tokayev introduced 4 large scale political and economic reforms since assuming the post in 2019. I should say that any reforms take a considerable amount of time to be implemented, especially when we are talking about a comprehensive transformation of the entire state model in the case of Kazakhstan. I do not agree that some of the reforms are too slow, instead I should emphasize that we are going relatively fast.  The political modernisation of the country and the further enhancing of the democratization of society is work in progress, and require a constant attention. We know that the US or any other democratic state in EU has not become such overnight. It took centuries for some countries to become a democratic, and as for us we are only 30 years old as modern independent states, and my understanding that we are doing relatively good in this sense.

We have very high hopes that the results of the referendum will have deep positive consequences for the future of our country.  It brings us one step closer to become a democratic state. Most importantly for me is that the referendum result paves the way for increasing the participation of the population in the governance of the country. It will nurture the culture of people in standing and defending their rights.

CS: A process of change is ongoing in Central Asia. How does Kazakhstan see its relations with the region and what can Kazakhstan do in the future to improve regional peace and security, especially in the face of new challenges, such as developments in Afghanistan and the current tensions between the west and Russia over Ukraine.

Relations with the Central Asian countries have always been one of the main foreign policy priorities of Kazakhstan and they remain so. Kazakhstan enjoys excellent relations with all our brotherly nations and committed to further strengthening and deepening the cooperation with all of them. Kazakhstan thinks that the deep integration is of high importance to the region in order to provide long term sustainable development.

As you have rightly mentioned all Central Asian countries are experiencing changes in their domestic and foreign policies. We are witnessing positive changes and attitudes toward more close cooperation between all countries. A true testament to this statement is the “Consultative meetings" of the leaders of the Central Asian Republics, an imitative that was first launched by Kazakhstan in 2019. The last such meeting took place in Turkmenistan in August 2021, and a joint statement of the leaders was adopted as a result of that meeting. It says that the further enhancement of ties in trade and economic, investment, industrial finance, energy, agriculture, transport, ecology and others are of high importance in order to provide a sustainable development for the region. In this regard, the parties agreed to increase mutual trade and further develop common mutually beneficial approaches to the effective solution of the problem of trade facilitation in the region. They also noted the need to intensify work to expand cooperation between business circles and regions of the Central Asian states in order to increase mutual trade, implement joint economic projects, including the development of trade and production sites in the border areas, as well as a network of wholesale distribution centers.

As for improving the issues of regional peace and stability they confirmed that one of the most important factors in maintaining and strengthening security and stability in Central Asia is the speedy settlement of the situation in neighboring Afghanistan. In this regard, the leaders of the central Asia republics expressed their readiness to provide all possible assistance for the speedy achievement of civil peace and harmony in Afghan society. We work together with our European partners in this direction. Therefore we welcome the outcome of the Almaty meeting of Central Asian and EU Special Envoys and Special Representatives that took place in May 30-31 and the great collaboration between CA-EU Envoys, the UNODC and the UNAMA leadership.

One of the main outcomes of the last Consultative Meeting was the  agreement to establish a dialogue on security and cooperation in Central Asia as a permanent consultative platform to consider topical issues of the development of the region on a systematic and regular basis.

In the light of new configuration of supply chains, Central Asia leaders emphasized the importance of further deepening multilateral cooperation in the transport and transit sector in order to ensure free and unhindered transit of goods and cargo, including the creation of new and modernization of existing international routes for air, road, rail, river and sea transport, multimodal transport corridors, international multifunctional logistics, trade and tourism centers, and the implementation of other joint infrastructure projects that ensure the efficient use of the region's transit potential.

 

CS: How will Kazakhstan benefit from the “Middle Corridor”?

Against the background of the complex geopolitical situation, Kazakhstan is currently looking into alternative routes to prevent the disruption of transit and freight traffic through our territory. We are redirecting freight traffic through the Middle Corridor.

Among a number of projects, the Middle Corridor stands out as a symbol of genuine connectivity as it envisages an extensive network of multimodal connections that offers benefits to all stakeholders.

The Middle Corridor, functioning under the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route International Association (TITR) is a multilateral institutional development linking the containerized rail freight transport networks of China and the European Union through the territory of Kazakhstan, the Caucasus, Turkey, and Eastern Europe. The multilateral, multimodal transport institution links Caspian and Black Sea ferry terminals with rail systems in China, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey, and / or the Black Sea.

Since March 2022, export cargoes were redirected to Latvian ports (Liepaja, Riga, Ventspils) and to the Middle Corridor. We reached an agreement with Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey on establishment of a joint venture on the route.

For Kazakhstan, the main challenge with the Middle Corridor is the adoption of a competitive unified tariff for Kazakh businesses, and the issue of cargo containerization.

Such a “container hub” is now being created on the basis of the Aktau Port. Large transnational companies like Singapore’s PSA International, Maersk, MSC and Cosco Shipping are already among potential partners of the project.

We expect that soon the volume of traffic through the sea ports of Aktau and Kuryk, the Kazakh ports along the Middle Corridor, will reach 10 million tons (including 4 million tons of re-directed export cargo).

The development of the Middle Corridor corresponds with the goals of the EU’s Global Gateway Strategy since it is a diverse and sustainable project that involves dozens of companies and countries, connecting Asia and Europe on the basis of mutual interests and trade.

To discuss these issues, together with the European Parliament, Kazakhstan Railways National Company and the «Trans-Caspian International Transport Route» Association, our Embassy is organizing a Roundtable on “Transit and Transport Cooperation Between Kazakhstan and the European Union” on 15 June 2022 in Brussels. This will be a good opportunity to showcase the “Middle Corridor” to an informed European audience.

 

CS: How do you characterize the current state of the EU-Kazakhstan relations? What should the two sides be focusing more to move forward?

To be brief, I should say that the relations between Kazakhstan and the EU are at their highest level. Next year, we will celebrate a milestone event in our relations – the 30th Anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties (February 2, 1993). Over the last three decades, we have managed to build a solid bilateral and multilateral cooperation based on trust, mutual respect and shared values. The European Union was, is and will be at the forefront of our foreign policy agenda. Kazakhstan is committed to further strengthening and deepening cooperation with the EU in the framework of the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement.

A very strong impetus to further strengthening and widening the avenues of the cooperation was given by the visit of the President of Kazakhstan, H.E. Kassym-Jomart Tokayev to Brussels last year in November, where he met President Charles Michel and President Ursula von der Leyen.

As a result of the visit we have agreed to work together on transition to green economy under the “European Green Deal”, to intensify our trade and investments, to build better “connectivity” in energy and raw materials, transport corridors and logistics. We share similar goals in protection of environment and post pandemic recovery. And, taking into account developments in Afghanistan, regional security is identified as a priority area of cooperation for the foreseeable future.

Trade turnover in 2021 amounted to 28.9 billion US dollars, which is 21.4% higher compared to 2020 (23.8 billion US dollars). At the same time, exports amounted to 23.6 billion US dollars, imports - 5.65 billion US dollars.

The EU is the largest investor in the economy of Kazakhstan. FDI inflows from the EU in 2021 amounted to USD 10.1 billion, which is 24.3% higher than in 2020 (USD 8.2 billion). Over the 30 years of cooperation FDI to Kazakhstan from the EU amounts to 170 billion USD. The main share of FDI from EU countries is in the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Cyprus, Luxembourg and Germany.

 

CS: What are the most interesting developments in art, music, cinema etc in Kazakhstan?

I think that Kazakhstan is experiencing a so called cultural renaissance nowadays. There are many talented singers and artists that  represent Kazakhstan with honour in the international arena. I would like to name a few of them. For example Imanbek Zeikenov, who is a self taught DJ, become very popular in the last two years and won the Grammy Awards. Now many prominent pop artist from the US and Europe are collaborating with him, including Rita Ora, Acon, David Guetta and many more. Another prominent Kazakh is Dimash Qudaibergen, who has fan clubs literally all over the world. His concerts in the US, Great Britain, Germany and Czech republic were all sold out. He is admired for creating a new genre in the music industry – so called “popera”, which is a fusion of  pop and opera music. As music experts claim, Dimash has 7 octave ranges and he performs in more than 10 languages.

The cinema industry is also booming as the number of locally produced content is rising and is being franchised by foreigners. Some of the producers are collaborating with the Hollywood artists and shooting some clips for American celebrities. For example, Aisultan Seitov produced clips for American rappers that were nominated for MTV Music Video Awards.

source: commonspace.eu interviewed Ambassador Margulan Baimukhan, the Head of the Kazakhstan Mission to the European Union
photo: HE Ambassador Margulan Baimukhan
 
 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)