China and Russia ignore western concerns and develop relations with Taliban

China last week hosted a conference on Afghanistan in the Eastern province of Anhui. Countries in attendance included Afghanistan, China, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Both Beijing and Moscow had words of support for the Taliban regime with the Russian Foreign Minister subsequently accepting the accreditation of a Taliban envoy.

Since the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan in August last year, China has attempted to play a bigger role in the region. Beijing has been mindful in its approach toward Afghanistan, advocating a “cautious alliance”. China is yet to formally recognize the Taliban government. However, it is strengthening its links with the Taliban. Last week, Wang Yi, the Chinese Foreign Minister, visited Kabul and invited Taliban government to the regional conference in Anhui. There, Wang said, “China has all along respected Afghanistan’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity, and is committed to supporting Afghanistan’s peaceful and stable development.”

Russia has also strengthened links with the Taliban regime. Sergey Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, said, "I would like to note that the first Afghan diplomat who arrived in Moscow last month and was sent by the new authorities has received accreditation at the Russian Foreign Ministry.” While Russia has labelled the Taliban as a “terrorist organisation”, the accreditation of the new government in Kabul signals a major shift in its policy toward Afghanistan.

An explanation for Beijing and Moscow’s push to reinforce relations with the Taliban is their concerns regarding instability and the possibile revival of hard line Islamic militantism in Afghanistan, and its possible impact on neighbouring countries. China has asked for assurances from the Taliban that they would not let members of China’s Turkic Muslim Uyghur minority, who want to overthrow Chinese rule in Xinjiang, operate in Afghanistan.

The ISKP, the Islamic State chapter active in Afghanistan and Central Asia, who are also opposed to the Taliban, are beginning to increase their presence in Central Asia. They have been  disseminating propaganda videos in several languages, including Uzbek, Tajik, and Kyrgyz. Moscow is worried that Islamic militants could undermine their southern buffer and eventually threaten Russia itself. Lavrov stated, "The plans of the Islamic State and its supporters to destabilize Central Asian states and export instability to Russia are of particular concern.” Beijing and Moscow hope that a strengthened Taliban will ensure stability in the region and prevent resurging Islamic militancy.

Both Russia and China are aware that the issue of relations with the Taliban is also very sensitive with western countries including the US and Europe. By taking steps unilaterally to establish relations they are clearly indicating that they will not be constrained by western concerns on the matter.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with The Diplomat (Washington D.C), Reuters (London), Eurasianet (New York), and other media agencies

Picture: Pakistani Foreign Minister (left), Chinese Foreign Minister (centre), and Taliban Foreign Minister (right), at a meeting in Anhui province. (Twitter/Chinese Ambassador to UN)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.