News.az: Nagorno-Karabakh might escalate into war, needs to be solved

'Nagorno-Karabakh is the most heated conflict in the region.'

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict remaining unresolved between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Turkey's neighbors to the east, is a potential threat to stability in the region that could explode at any time, analysts agree, urging the international community to become more committed to settling the conflict as soon as possible.

“Nagorno-Karabakh is the most heated conflict in the region, which could cause the biggest damage and spark tension between the nations, as hostilities are still alive and military troops are on alert along the border,” Mitat Chelikpala, a regional analyst from Kadir Has University, said at the panel discussion “Frozen conflicts in the South Caucasus and Nagorno-Karabakh,” sponsored by the Caspian Strategic Institute (HASEN) in cooperation with the Eurasia Institute in Istanbul on Friday.

In an address harshly criticizing the international community for not developing a united stance to settle the conflict, which has been deadlocked for more than two decades, Chelikpala urged the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group to be more active, as the analyst says that the Minsk Group, established back in 1992 to settle the Nagorno-Karabakh, is not fulfilling its mission.

Commenting on the legal aspects of the conflict and peace talks between the sides, Efgan Niftiyev of HASEN said it is not only Armenia and Azerbaijan that are affected but that the whole region is going through a very critical period, mentioning the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict as the main cause. War can flare up any time as the process for settlement of the conflict drags on, a fact which actually forces both sides to increase their military strength in the region.

“Peace talks have almost been suspended, as the sides already cannot stomach sitting down at a negotiating table which does not produce tangible results. The conflict can be solved only if both sides [Armenia and Azerbaijan] make compromises to come up with a peaceful solution,” Niftiyev noted, urging the Minsk Group be more committed to its mission and to help both sides find a peaceful end as soon as possible.  

In the meantime, underlining the importance of the Track Two process, which involves the two communities in reconciliation projects, as state-level peace talks preserve the status quo and produce no results, the analysts are hopeful that the Track Two level meetings will be significant in forcing both sides to take difficult decisions towards a solution.

Today's Zaman

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)