What happened to the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) natural gas pipeline?

The idea of the TAPI pipeline, designed to transport gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan and India, has been around for approximately 30 years. However, in practice, little progress has been made. Clashes between Pakistan and India in May this year and renewed fighting on the Pakistan–Afghanistan border have further slowed implementation (check out Monday Commentary: South Asian nations must avoid a catastrophe, on commonspace.eu for further information).

Despite this, Turkmenistan and Afghanistan recently held a ceremony on Monday (20 October) to inaugurate a small section of the pipeline between the Turkmen–Afghan border (Serhetabat) and the Afghan city of Herat. According to Afghan officials, about 14km of pipe have been laid, with 70km more planned. For now, the focus of the project appears to be on constructing the pipeline as far as Herat in Afghanistan.

There are a few challenges that the TAPI pipeline continues to face. Firstly, security inside Afghanistan remains a major issue, though security conditions have changed under the Taliban. The Taliban, through its imposition of brutal control, has reduced security concerns; however, the problem is far from over. Secondly, the tensions between India and Pakistan raise doubts about whether gas flows can pass through both countries reliably. While the project is designed to increase regional trust and stability, Central Asia analyst Bruce Pannier argues that the pipeline could just as easily become a manipulation tool. If, for example, there is renewed fighting between Pakistan and India or Pakistan and Afghanistan, there is a high chance that Pakistan may stop the gas flow into India or that Afghanistan may stop the gas flow into Pakistan. Thirdly, financing and infrastructure gaps remain large. The pipeline is planned for 33 billion cubic metres of gas per year, but Afghanistan’s infrastructure can handle only a fraction of this.

While the TAPI project is still officially active, its goals are now much smaller and slower than first planned. Turkmenistan and Afghanistan are moving forward with a limited version, but the dream of reaching Pakistan and India is still far away.

Source: commonspace.eu with the Times of Central Asia and other agencies

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)