In Tunisia, President Kaïs Saïed announces the dissolution of the Supreme Judicial Council

On Sunday 6 February, Tunisian President Kaïs Saied took a further step in the dismantling of the institutional structure resulting from the 2014 Constitution, by announcing the dissolution of the Supreme Judicial Council. He stated that one of the institutions guaranteeing the country's judicial independence "has become a thing of the past."

Saied, who had dismissed the government and suspended parliament last July, attributed his new decision to the “corruption and bias” existing in the judicial council. This unconstitutional measure would be justified by the delay and obstacles in the handling of certain cases, according to Kaïs Saied, who is particularly concerned about the assassination of former Tunisian leftists Belaïd and Brahmi, who were killed in 2013 while campaigning against the government in charge at the time. Coincidentally or not, this decision comes on the eve of the anniversary of the death of Belaïd, on 6 February 2013. This judicial body has indeed been the subject of much criticism, notably in mid-2021, when the President of the Court of Cassation Rached and the former public prosecutor Akremi accused each other of corruption, terrorism and money laundering.

However, after years which saw the judiciary controlled by the dictatorial regime of Zine El-Abidine ben Ali (1987-2011), the creation of the Supreme Judicial Council was considered essential in the 2014 Constitution. This council, an independent authority established in 2016 to appoint judges, is composed of 45 judges, two-thirds of whom are elected by Parliament, and the remaining third is constituted by the newly elected judges. 

The Supreme Judicial Council's response was swift, and on Sunday (6 February) it rejected the dissolution "in the absence of a legal and constitutional framework" allowing Kaïs Saïed to do so. In the same statement, it was announced that the members of the council would continue to serve. 

President Kaïs Saïed's supporters praise his efforts to get rid of a corrupt and inefficient system, while his critics and political opponents accuse him of heading towards a form of authoritarianism that is detrimental to Tunisian democracy.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Le Monde, DW News and other media outlets
Picture: President Kaïs Saïed dissolves top justice watchdog; Twitter: @almayadeen_es


 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)