The statement of the Minsk Group co-Chairmen triggers reaction in Baku and Yerevan

On Saturday, 9 March, the three co-Chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Process, mandated by the international community to facilitate the process for a peaceful solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, issued what for them is an unusually long statement in which they urged the parties to the conflict to remain focused on the upcoming summit between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan under their auspices and underlined "the importance of maintaining an environment conducive to productive discussions".

read more: International community tries to keep Armenia and Azerbaijan focused on conflict settlement

The statement immediately triggered a response from both Baku and Yerevan. The foreign ministries of Armenia and Azerbaijan issued statements through their spokespersons on the same day, both giving their own spin to the statement, and as often happened in the past, highlighting the bits they found most convenient. Over the last forty eight hours, numerous commentators, experts and political parties have joined the chorus in pretty much the same vein. Not exactly what the co-Chairmen had in mind when they issued the statement, but it quite accurately reflects the highly polorised situation within public opinion on both sides of the conflict divide.

This is the background for other events happening these days. In Azerbaijan, the Ministry of Defence launched large military manoevres on Monday morning (11 March). Azerbaijani military sources told the media that "the exercises involve up to 10,000 military personnel, up to 500 tanks and other armoured vehicles, up to 300 missiles and artillery systems of different calibre, multiple launch rocket systems, and mortars, up to 20 army and front-line  aircraft."

The sources said that "in the course of the exercise, troops will implement tasks of preparing an offensive operation, striking an imaginary enemy in several directions, breaking through its defence, and defeating military groups, as well as launching missile and artillery strikes against military and strategic targets located in the enemy's defensive depth. At the same time, combat firing will be carried out in training centres and combined-arms ranges using new weapons systems, including the practical launch of missiles."

Armenia has condemned the exercises and said that Azerbaijan failed to give advance notice, as it was due to under several international obligations.

In Armenia meanwhile, opposition forces of various shades have used the statement of the co-Chairmen of the OSCE Minsk process to attack the government of Nikol Pashinyan. On Monday morning Pashinyan travelled to Stepanakert on a military helicopter and was met at Stepanakert airport by the leadership of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. Pashinyan was accompanied by his wife Anna Hakobyan.

A government source in Yerevan said that Pashinyan has convened on Tuesday a meeting of the Armenian National Security Council in Stepanakert. This is a highly unusual, perhaps even unprecedented step, and it is not clear what will be discussed in this meeting.

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Nikol Pashinyan arrives in Stepanakert on Monday (11 March) and is greeted by Bako Sahakyan, president of the self-declared Nagorno Karabakh Republic (picture courtesy of ARMENPRESS, Yerevan)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular