South Ossetia attempts to join a convention of the Shanghai Treaty Organisation

South Ossetia announced on Thursday that it will seek to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Convention to Combat Extremism. The de facto president of South Ossetia, Anatoly Bibilov, signed the relevant documents.

Earlier on March 20, the Parliament of the self-declared republic ratified a law "On the Accession of the Republic of South Ossetia to the Convention of the Shanghai Organization for Combating Extremism".

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization Convention to Combat Extremism was signed in Astana on June 9, 2017. In accordance with Article 30 of the SCO Convention on Countering Extremism, states that are not members of the SCO can join it.

The Convention enshrines fundamental provisions on the danger of extremism as a breeding ground for terrorism, on the leading role of states and their competent authorities in countering extremism and terrorism, the need to comply with international law and the UN Charter, above all, respect for the principles of sovereignty and equality of states, non-interference in their internal affairs , condemnation of the ideology and practice of extremism in all its forms and manifestations and the inadmissibility of public appeals and incitement to extremist actions.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "whilst joining the Convention may be seen as a harmless, even benevolent step, the move will be seen by the international community as a brazen attempt by Tskhinvali to expand its diplomatic footprint. The prospect will also be very unwelcome in Tbilisi where the Georgian government has been trying to stop any engagement of the authorities of the self-delclared republic in any international diplomatic activity, since Tbilisi sees South Ossetia as an artificial creation of Russia.

The Shanghai Co-operation Organisation has eight member states namely, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan who were the founding members, as well as India and Pakistan. Of these only Russia has recognised the independence of South Ossetia and maintains diplomatic relations with it. Furthermore many of the other countries have their own problems with separatist entities and are unlikely to be ready to open pandora's box on this issue. This notwithstanding Tskhinvali would not have moved on this had it not got some kind of green light from Moscow. So the question arisis what is Moscow's game in this, and why now? The move also comes on top of what many consider unacceptable behaviour by the de facto authorities during the current coronavirus pandemic, including the ongoing process of borderisation, as well as dissemination of fake news and disinformation by Tskhinvali based media outlets.

Most of the world community sees South Ossetia as part of Georgia, and the Government of Georgia has designated South Ossetia as Russian occupied territory, Russia, Syria, Nicarague, Venezuela and a handful of other countries recognised the independence of South Ossetia after the 2008 Georgia-Russia War."

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: A South Ossetian flag flies over Tskinvali (archive picture)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)