Reactions following the Aliyev-Pashinyan talks in Dushambe

There have been a number of comments following the informal unscheduled discussion between the president of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and the prime minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan on the margins of the CIS summit in Dushambe on Friday (28 September).

Over the weekend both sides reported the meeting, using broadly the same language.

read more: Aliyev and Pashinyan hold unscheduled informal talks in Dushambe

There have subsequently been further comments

Azerbaijan is always ready for constructive negotiations and contacts serving the settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, the Deputy Head of the Foreign Policy Department of the Azerbaijani Presidential Administration Hikmat Hajiyev told Trend news agency on Monday morning (1 October). The conversation in Dushambe "started at the initiative of the Armenian Prime Minister", Hajiyev said.

"This once again shows that the format of the negotiations remains unchanged, and negotiations are conducted only between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which are parties of the conflict. Within the framework of the same format, in September, meetings between the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan were held during the UN General Assembly in New York, and in July in Brussels. We assess this positively, and Azerbaijan is always ready for constructive negotiations and contacts serving the settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. This once again demonstrates Azerbaijan's commitment to the existing format," Hajiyev said.

He also commented on the strengthening the ceasefire regime on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border and the line of contact of troops.

"The Azerbaijani side has repeatedly stated that the main reason for the ceasefire violation is the illegal presence of Armenian troops in the occupied Azerbaijani territories and the continuation of military occupation. The Armenian side has always been responsible for the ceasefire violation and the aggravation of the situation. I would like to mention the large-scale military exercises conducted by the Armenian armed forces in the occupied Azerbaijani territories after the meeting of the heads of state in November 2014 in Paris, the incitement of a well-known helicopter incident, as well as Armenian armed troops' fire by heavy guns at civilians living along the contact line in April of 2016, and intentionally aggravation of the situation," Hajiyev said.

"So, the withdrawal of Armenian troops from the occupied Azerbaijani territories in accordance with the requirements of the UN Security Council's resolutions will eliminate not only military risk, but there will also be no need for a ceasefire, and there will be comprehensive opportunities for political solution of the conflict. This will ensure peace, stability and security in the region," he added.

Earlier there was a further comment by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan on the meeting: Azerbajiani President Ilham Aliyev left the impression of an educated person, he told Armenian media. "He left a positive impression. We had a normal, civilized conversation," Armenian media quoted Pashinyan as saying.

The prime minister said that an agreement was reached on regular contacts with Aliyev, but Pashinyan is not sure that the leadership of Azerbaijan will follow this agreement. "I'm not sure that the agreements will be implemented," he said.

He added that they plan to inform the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group about the agreements reached between the leadership of Armenia and Azerbaijan on supporting permanent contacts between the countries.

The question of Karabakh's return to negotiation table was discussed. "We also discussed this issue. Of course, our views are different. I called the President of Artsakh Bako Sahakyan and informed him about the reached agreements. The President of Artsakh noted that the agreement is acceptable for them as well."

In the meantime there has also been a comment from the de facto authorities in the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic: "The Republic of Artsakh welcomes the agreement between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on de-escalating the situation in the line of contact, but treats the issue with certain reservations, Davit Babayan, a spokesperson for the de facto authorities told ARMENPRESS.

"It is an interesting and commendable development if we were to give a political assessment. The three points which they agreed upon is very important. But there is a reservation here that completely trusting Aliyev or generally the Azerbaijani leadership isn't right, because they might breach any agreement in the most convenient time in the lowest way, which practice has shown. Nevertheless, let's hope that this time this agreement will give some kind of a positive effect," he said.

The spokesperson warned against expecting developments in the short term. "We should wait. We should view this agreement not within two hours or one-two days, but in the long-term," he said arguing that "Aliyev's consent on the agreement might depend on pressures from different levels against the Azerbaijani leadership".

"It is interesting that before this the Co-Chairs made a very strict statement. Certainly it was first of all addressed to Azerbaijan, because it is this very side that violates the ceasefire regime, and it is an interesting coincidence that it was the Russian President [Putin] who introduced the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders to each other from a formal perspective. Taking into consideration that Russia is one of the OSCE Misnk Group Co-Chairing countries, it's not ruled out that Aliyev is in a very unique situation when great pressure exists against him, and has found a suitable occasion to both get to know the Armenian new leader and show himself to be a constructive side," Babayan said.

Nevertheless, Babayan noted that the situation at the line of contact is stable.

source: commonspace.eu with TREND news agency Baku, Armenpress (Yerevan) and news,am (Yerevan)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)