Provocative news item denied by both Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The Ministries of Defence of Armenia and Azerbaijan are often known for issuing diametrically contradictory statements on events that happen on the line of contact separating their two forces in the Karabakh conflict zone. Over the last two days however both sides moved swiftly to deny reports that had been disseminated by some media sources in Azerbaijan that there had been an Armenian attack on Nakhcivan. The reports suggested that the Armenian Air Force was involved, and even suggested that one village, Leketagh had been evacuated after Armenian forces had occupied the heights around the village.

Information from Nakhcivan, which is an autonomous republic of Azerbaijan but which is separated from the rest of the Azerbaijani territory by Armenia, is difficult to get under normal circumstances. The rumours could therefore not be immediately verified by the mainstream media, or other independent sources, and as a result they spread over the last days. There had been incidents involving Armenian and Azerbaijani forces for some days, and both sides suffered casualties. But the advent of a deep incursion with air support, if it had really happened, would have constituted a grave escalation of the current low intensity conflict and cease fire violations.

Both the Ministry of Defence of Armenia, as well as of Azerbaijan, have now denied that any serious incident has taken place, and descibe the original reports as provocation. Mainstream Azerbaijani media have published pictures of a peaceful village of Leketagh and say that residents have denied that they had been under attack at all. The Azerbaijani news agency APA reports that a journalist from a local Nakhcvan newspaper, Elnur Kalbizadeh visited the region and found it to be peaceful. It also published pictures of the village.

Commonspace.eu political editor commented on developments:

"This incident was either a very bad piece of journalism or an outright provocation aimed at instigating more serious consequences. In both cases it raises the danger of the current volatile situation on the line of contact separating Armenian and Azerbaijani forces. The daily violations of the cease fire are a source of concern to the international community that has been calling on both sides to accept a more rigorous supervision of the cease fire and to adopt confidence building measures that can reduce and if possible eliminate the daily incidents and regular loss of life on the front line. There has been an ambivalent response to these calls. The danger of small incidents escalating, either through misperception, or even because they  are on purpose distoprted by either of the sides, or even a third party, constitutes the most likely risk that can re-ignite the Karabakh conflict into an outright war. The rumours of the last days are a good example of how rumour or false stories can spread like wild-fire. On this occasion at least it was heartening to see that the Ministries of Defence of both countries moved swiftly to deny the rumours."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The village of Leketagh on 11 June 2014 (picture taken by Elnur Kalbizadeh reporduced by APA)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)